Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

October 8, 2009 -

As airports turn to new types of technology to use for screening air travelers, videogame technology may play a role.

An article on CNN details a new Homeland Security-backed project, dubbed Future Attribute Screening Technology (FAST), which measures physiological signs—heart rate, breathing, eye movement, body temperature and fidgeting—in an attempt to decipher whether or not the person being scanned intends to do harm.

The component currently used to monitor fidgeting? A Wii Fit Balance Board modified to show the weight shift of the subject in question. Unfortunately there doesn’t appear to be a concrete correlation between weight shifting and intent to terrorize, as a study is currently underway to determine what level of fidgeting would necessitate a secondary security screen.

Via Kotaku, thanks Mdo7! Image from CNN.


Comments

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

 Quick grab me I twitch constantly I must be a terrorist I have never been known to stand still even when in formation (to the dismay of my commanding officer).  

 

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

Wow we're going to place the security of our country in the hands of a plastic childrens toy from Japan. *spends next three hours slamming head on keyboard*

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

I would just like to say, God bless whoever made those little bottles of booze for the airline carts.  I couldn't fly without them.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

Great, I fidget all the time in line. I'm going to the habius corpus-free hellhole du jour. 

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

Completely ridiculous. This is even worse than a polygraph. I think the reasons have pretty much been covered though. 

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

So, it's a machine that will make many people nervous in a place where most people are pretty nervous already (security check) and it will check if people are nervous. Right.

So:

-people who are nervous about being in security check

-people who are nervous because they have the wrong skin color (of course they will be searched regardless of the result this machine gives, like usual)

-people who are nervous for any of a million other reasons

-people who have ADD

-people who have a rock stuck in their shoe

-people who are getting leg cramps from standing so long in line

-people who need to pee after standing so long in line

-people who are late for their flight (probably because of the line)

-or any combination of the above

will be getting the terrorist treatment...excellent.

 

Not to mention it would have to be constructed out of some pretty heavy duty material for the people who buy two seats on the plane.

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

"The Board has declared you guilty of thoughtcrime, citizen. The Board is never wrong. You are being diverted to our reeducation facility."

Do the neurotic Bauer-wannabes really need another toy to use in harassing and intimidating innocent travelers?

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

I have a question: can a wii fit stand up to the stress of some fatass weighing, say, 400 pounds, standing on it?  It just seems like it's only a very small device, and I just wouldn't think that it could repeatedly take heavy people standing on it...

This is, as I said before, stupid.  'Anxiety' isn't a sure sign of a terrorist in disguise.  What about people who are worried about, say, missing a flight, not getting home in time to see their kid's ball game, missing out on a wedding, their luggage being lost/destroyed, their car being towed, etc.  The list goes on and on.  There's a lot of reasons for anxiety in an airport, not least of all being the ridiculously inflated prices of everything in the airport.  So, with all that anxiety, I doubt that they'll be able to pick out terrorists; they'll just spend their time doing what they do now: harassing people without any real reason.  Now, instead of it being based on, say, the length of one's beard or the clothing one's wearing, they'll do it based on the wii fit's perceived ability to measure anxiety.

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

"I have a question: can a wii fit stand up to the stress of some fatass weighing, say, 400 pounds, standing on it?"

Possibly, but Nintendo recommends that you not use it if you weigh more than 330 lbs.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

This is just as bullshit as a polygraph test. There is no way this method can detect a person's intent. It can only detect nervouseness. It's only a tool for intimidation.

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

Security expert Bruce Schneier recently wrote about this on his blog.

 

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

why cant we just go back to using psychics like in the good old days.

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

That is very interesting.  And really, that is the extent of my opinion on this.

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

I am guessing that they are hoping to use this technology to decide who to search and who to let through rather then who to arrest on this evidence alone.

Even with that,.. this is a horrible idea.  Make nervous people's flight experince even worse?  I already know people with SAD who will not fly anymore, this would probably send even more people over the edge.

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

What about people with 'restless leg syndrome' or whatever that crap is supposed to be called?  I mean, wouldn't they seem to be a little too 'anxious', and thus be singled out based on a 'disease' or 'handicap'?  

This whole thing is stupid at all  levels.

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

So what abotu people that are nervous in crowds and hate flying?


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

The old heave ho to Guantanamo of course!

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

If a polygraph isn't admissible in court, then this is not gonna stand a f***ing chance.

Oh wait, it's combating terrorism, no evidence to support accusations is needed anyway!

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

If anything, it sounds just like it literally is a polygraph, just more techie.

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

Exactly!!


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

With ya on that! Since when does fidgeting constitute intent to terrorize? Especially when youre being frisked at the airport by action-hungry security!

Im ADHD; does that mean Im a terrorist too? Or people with RLS?

Re: Wii Fit Balance Board: Terrorist Catcher?

Or anxiety disorders like mine?

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenSarkeesian and Quinn continue to get harassed and attacked and so, the story stays in the headlines. If Wolfe gets swatted again, it will be in the news again.09/19/2014 - 6:56pm
Andrew EisenYou mean Wesley Wolfe? The swatting appeared to be over his DMCA takedown, not due to his color or gender.09/19/2014 - 6:53pm
ConsterSo Sleaker, what's the sand like?09/19/2014 - 6:53pm
quiknkold@CraigR. Spreading Misandry is not going to kill Misogyny. Its just going to fuel it. half the people supporting that arguement are mysoginists themselves. They just dont know it.09/19/2014 - 6:51pm
Sleaker@CraigR - there's nothing to get over. There's no issue here until someone does an actual study on harassment rates.09/19/2014 - 6:48pm
quiknkoldWe never said Gamers were the only victims. Yes, Anita and Zoe got a bad rap. Yes, Zoe's ex was way out of line. Do I disagree with them? Depends on the arguement. Did they deserve what happened to them? Hell Effing No.09/19/2014 - 6:48pm
Sleakerbut news outlets have a tendency to blow up and sensationalize it if the person can be desrcibed as a minority, maybe because it gets the hits. How long were the 2 recent swattings in the news for? 1 was a white male developer....09/19/2014 - 6:47pm
Craig R.Get over it.09/19/2014 - 6:46pm
Craig R.Gamers are just lucky that their behavior wasn't brought to attention of everybody else sooner, and gamers are pissy about that09/19/2014 - 6:46pm
SleakerIn fact, just because a few female developers every year get harassed doesn't make it systematic. As a whole developers are harassed by people.. Swatted, etc.09/19/2014 - 6:46pm
Craig R.And if you don't think misogyny and sexism is widespread, then you're living with your head buried in the sand09/19/2014 - 6:45pm
Craig R.Apparently it's the gamers who are the only victims from GamerGate09/19/2014 - 6:44pm
Sleaker@AE - 1 person getting harassed is a problem. But just because 1 person gets harassed for being a female developer doesn't mean it's a systematic problem or indicative of a whole demographic.09/19/2014 - 6:44pm
Andrew EisenI don't believe anyone said or even remotely implied that harassing anyone was okay.09/19/2014 - 6:41pm
quiknkoldGeneral are being harassed, doxxed, hacked, just because they are being perceived as white males. And what about the White Males who are victims. Its ok to harass them? Anita Sarkeesian gets a bomb threat yeah, but what about the others.09/19/2014 - 6:36pm
quiknkoldwhat about all the gamers who are being harrassed, Andrew. Why does it have to be just about the women in the industry. We have 2 women, and only a handful of accounts recorded. While you could throw a dart at the internet and find a site where Gamers in09/19/2014 - 6:35pm
Andrew EisenOkay, you're talking specifically about harassment of women in the industry. So... how many (or what percentage of) women have to be harassed before you'd consider it a problem?09/19/2014 - 6:27pm
SleakerSo I think at best, we can just say something akin to 'there might be a problem, but we need more reliable information'09/19/2014 - 6:11pm
SleakerBut that takes someone actually doing a legitimate study on females in game development workplaces etc. And so far a good number of studies that get shoved into the center of attention are sensationalized through shoddy metrics and practices.09/19/2014 - 6:10pm
Sleaker@AE - I think there are select instances of gender problems that are highlighted, but I don't believe they are the norm, or 'widespread.' What would be more helpful is to show hard statistics. 1 in 100 female developers is harassed or somthing like this.09/19/2014 - 6:10pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician