Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior Correlation

Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior Correlation

October 26, 2009

A new study undertaken by a group of Massachusetts General Hospital researchers attempts to further explore whether a link exists between playing violent videogames and aggressive behavior in adolescents.

“M-Rated Video Games and Aggressive or Problem Behavior Among Young Adolescents” surveyed 1,254 7th and 8th grade students in Pennsylvania and South Carolina in late 2004. Youths were asked which five games they had “played a lot” in the past six months and were asked to detail any “delinquent,” bullying or physically aggressive behaviors.

Among those who were current game players, 48.8% (67.9% boys and 29.2% girls) had at least one M-rated game on their most-played list. Cross tallying and crunching variables led the researchers to conclude:

M-rated games remained a strongly significant predictor of engaging in bullying and physical aggression However, we found no significant relationship between playing M-rated games and being a victim of bullies, or engaging in delinquent behaviors.

Boys were then split off from girls and their responses analyzed separately. With boys “M-rated game exposure ceased to be a significant predictor of bullying, and aggressive personality,” though “M-rated game play was still a significant, though weaker, predictor of fighting.”

With girls, “frequent M-rated game use became an even stronger predictor of bullying and fighting.”

The group concluded:

Overall, our hypothesis that heavy play of Mature-rated, violent games would predict a greater risk for common problem behaviors, even when controlling for potential confounders suggested by previous research, was partially supported.

The researchers pointed out a few limitations of their study, which included the fact that “Involvement in problem behaviors is common among adolescents.” Also, responses from the children indicating their top five games of the past six months were not independently verified.

Interestingly, in touching on legislation that seeks to ban children’s access to “violent” videogames, and asking “who would determine whether a game fits these critieria,” the study states, “Because of these complexities, it is unlikely that a narrow category of games could be clearly identified and supported by research as broadly harmful to young people.”

GP: We have an inquiry in with one of the researchers to make sure that's it's OK to post the whole study (PDF) on the website.

Update: Just a note that the research team included Dr. Cheryl Olson, co-author of Grand Theft Childhood.

Update 2: Here's a link to a PDF of the full study.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

"M-rated games remained a strongly significant predictor of engaging in bullying and physical aggression However, we found no significant relationship between playing M-rated games and... engaging in delinquent behaviors."

So, bullying and physical aggression are not considered delinquent behaviors or a strongly significant predictor of behavior does not qualify as a significant relationship?

Also, the results of this study are based entirely on the word of grade schoolers?  Not the best way to go about collecting data, folks.

Of course, this is just based on a summary.  I'll reserve judgment until I read the study itself.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

It sounds to me like the study is not making any claims of causation, only correlation.  I hope I'm reading that right.

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

That's what it seems like to me too.  Unfortunately it seems that the rule of Correlation =/= Causation is becoming increasingly overlooked in all "studies" these days.

"Go ahead and hate your neighbor, go ahead and cheat a friend. Do it in the name of Heaven, Jack Thompson'll justify it in the end." - nightwng2000

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

That's what I got out of this, too.  The way they phrased their findings, it seemed like they were looking at violent video games as a marker of aggressive behavior than any kind of causal link one way or the other.


Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Hmm... I wonder if bullies are more likely to want to play violent M-rated games. I guess not, since these fine scientists would obviously have pointed it out???

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Isn't that exactly what the study is saying?

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

It is a good thing bullying never happened until video games came out. Oh wait.....

The more I see stuff like these, the more it reminds me of the whole 'heavy metal music is corrupting our youth' spill from back in the day.

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Oh, for god's sake, did any of these 'researchers' ever think to just look at national data on violent crime over the past 50 years?  It's plummeted among 14-17 year-olds and gone down in every age group except people-over-50 (i.e. the ones claiming that video games are making kids more violent).

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

In fact, Cheryl Olsen mentions it several times in Grand Theft Childhood.  Besides, it doesn't automatically invalidate the data, or the study for that matter.

---
The Mammon Philosophy

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Repeat after me, folks: Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation.

 

....Am I getting through to them yet?

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Sometimes you need to get angry, lighting a fire under ones' ass can actually be a good thing.

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

This is the problem I have, this study sounds responsible it sounds like they're saying they see a correlation between violent video game playing and aggression/violence.

I think that's probably accurate. I'd have to read the whole study but it doesn't sound like they make the claim of causation, which is responsible science.

The problem is that some politician is going to grab this study and say "This study says people who are violent tend to play more violent video games ergo violent video games CAUSE violence."

What these scientists SHOULD do is require every legitimate copy of this study whether in print or electronic format to carry the following statement printed on the top of every page exactly as I have posted it:

THIS STUDY DOES NOT ARGUE THAT VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES CAUSE VIOLENT BEHAVIOR!

ANYONE ARGUING THAT THIS STUDY STANDS FOR THAT IS EITHER IGNORANT  OR LYING!

Preferably in red

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

From this study, I gather that those that are violent play more violent video games. Not that violent video games cause people to be violent.

-If an apple a day keeps the doctor away....what happens when a doctor eats an apple?-

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Games are exciting ,excitement=energy,energy=aggression. This study is saying games give you energy..... next...



Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/

Re: Another Study Eyes Games & Aggressive Behavior ...

Can't wait to read the whole study -- I find it interesting that heightened Mature gameplay is a predictor of increased violence for girls, but not boys.

---
The Mammon Philosophy

ECA IconA PUBLICATION OF THE ECA RSS IconSUBSCRIBE User LoginLOGIN / REGISTER

Crispy Gamer




       

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 03/20/10 at 10:32pm
Aliasalpha: Ding dong the witch is dead eh? Maybe we'll finally be treated as adults here and women can have small tits again!
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:28pm
JDKJ: Survey says no opinion either way. But approval is high among wombats.
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:25pm
BearDogg-X: JDKJ: What does the wallabies and crocodiles think of Skippy?
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:24pm
Andrew Eisen: Beardogg-X - Not staunchly, no. However, only one AG has gone on record as supporting an R18+ rating. The rest either stated no position or declined to comment.
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:23pm
JDKJ: Of 437 koala bears surveyed, 420 disagree with choice of Skippy for interim AG.
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:21pm
BearDogg-X: With Atkinson stepping down, the question now becomes was there any other AG besides him that was against R18+? His stepping down does make R18+ more likely to be approved.
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:18pm
Andrew Eisen: Well, Adelaide readers seem pleased with Atkinson's decision. 420 out of 437.
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:15pm
JDKJ: BREAKING: Vacant Aussie AG post to be filled by Skippy, the Bush Kangaroo.
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:12pm
Andrew Eisen: Flamespeak - Gamecube and Xbox came out in late 2001 with contollers pretty similar to the Dual Shock. You never know thoug. This Fall may be when the standard controller changes from the Dual Shock to a motion wand. *shudder*
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:09pm
Flamespeak: at a quicker rate these days.
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:09pm
Flamespeak: I believe that was launched in the first part of 1998. 2 years seems kind of fast too, but then again the world seems to move
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:05pm
Andrew Eisen: Flamespeak - Not when you consider Sony's been using the same controller since the PS1.
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:03pm
BearDogg-X: Andrew Eisen: I meant that it won't take as many people to change their votes next election. Besides that, it's become a moot point now that he's stepping down as AG as soon as the election's over.
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:02pm
Flamespeak: Seems kind of early considering the PS2 didn't launch until well into 2000.
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:01pm
Andrew Eisen: Fleamespeak - I'd say since around the turn of the century.
Posted 03/20/10 at 10:01pm
BearDogg-X: BREAKING NEWS: Atkinson will step down as South Australia Attorney-General; will remain in Parliament
Posted 03/20/10 at 09:59pm
Andrew Eisen: BearDogg-X - Not sure what your point about Atkinson having only 8500 votes is, seeing as that's around 65% (of the total votes counted at the time).
Posted 03/20/10 at 09:57pm
Flamespeak: I remember when the NES controller held that honor and the stand alone one button joystick before that.
Posted 03/20/10 at 09:56pm
Flamespeak: artistic rendering of things associated with gaming? Even GP has a rough version of one in their logo.
Posted 03/20/10 at 09:56pm
Flamespeak: Just out of curiosity, when did the PS2 controller become the 'standard' for video game controller representation in most
Login or register to post shouts