A bill up for consideration before the Senate looks for ways to deal with the growing piles of disposed—and potentially toxic—electronic devices.
S.1397, or “Electronic Device Recycling Research and Development Act” was introduced by Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY) and seeks new ways to attack the growing problem of “e-waste.”
Citing Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) stats that over 2.0 billion “computers, televisions, wireless devices, printers, gaming systems, and other devices” have been sold since 1980, the proposed bill notes that “collection of such electronic devices is expensive, and separation and proper recycling of some of the materials recovered, like lead from cathode-ray tube televisions, is costly.”
The bill seeks to enable research into such areas as ways to safely separate and remove hazardous materials from electronic devices, how to develop environmentally-friendly alternatives and to identify the “social, behavioral, and economic barriers to recycling.”
Another proposed aspect of the bill would see grants given to higher education facilities to enable the development of curriculum that “incorporates the principles of environmental design into the development of electronic devices.”
As ArsTechnica notes, the proposed bill is really just opening the topic up for discussion in hopes of setting the tone for future actions.
S.1397 was introduced on July 6, 2009 and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Comments
there has to be a way (in addition to the govt trying to promote e-recycle in said bill) to assist by allowing both ESA and ECA promoting e-cycle, I mean G4 did it(and is contiuning to do so today)
Watching JT on GP is just like watching an episode of Jerry springer only as funny as the fights
Would not plasma burn it all down to dust and not produce very bad smoke, that could not be filtered down to exsectable levels?
Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/
Why not recycle some of the materials in the devices?
Not cost effective
~Weatherlight~
Ya I mean even stripping gold and silver out of the items in question its not very plasuable also some of the left over matreials make there way to china after they are recycled in the states for the stuff essayist to get.....
So all in all we are better off finding a way to carbonize it turning it into dust that can be either separated or throwen out into land fills.
A super furnace should be able to vape 50-70% the exhaust is filtered a few times, the left over dust could be further prosed into bins of heavy metals and such.
Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/
Heavy metal smoke = very bad idea.
Plasma dose not really allow things to burn(burn=smoke) 0-o
Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/
So more accurately vapor than smoke. Heavy metals are incredibly toxic in gaseous form.
Guess where "Mad as a hatter" came from - mercury vapors from felt production.
What research is there to do? Just make it more convienent, maybe give some incentives to turn the stuff in, and educate people how to do it.
Or at the very least get rid of that charge to recycle old tv's and monitors. Seriously I'm doing the responsible thing and getting this broken monitor recycled and I have to pay for you to take it? **** you!
Exactly, pay some guys $40 to "recycle" an old tv(even though it's dumped in a third world country) or just dump it at the lot down the road for free.