Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

November 4, 2009

As the 6th round of Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) negotiations get underway in Seoul, Korea, a dispatch has been sent to President Obama expressing concern over the “lack of transparency and openness” surrounding the initiative.

The letter notes that “Unlike nearly all other multilateral and plurilateral discussions about intellectual property norms, the ACTA negotiations have been held in deep secrecy.”

While a curious mix of entities have been allowed to see ACTA documents, after signing a non-disclosure agreement, the letter states that “there were no opportunities for academic experts or the general public to review the documents,” adding that “very few” public interest or consumer groups were included as well.

Among the signees of the letter were The Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA), Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Knowledge Ecology International (KEI), Students for Free Culture and the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights.

Countries negotiating the agreement include the U.S., Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, and Switzerland.

BoingBoing (thanks Torven) sums up a few leaked bullet points from ACTA, among them:

•    That ISPs have to proactively police copyright on user-contributed material. This means that it will be impossible to run a service like Flickr or YouTube or Blogger, since hiring enough lawyers to ensure that the mountain of material uploaded every second isn't infringing will exceed any hope of profitability.

•    That the whole world must adopt US-style "notice-and-takedown" rules that require ISPs to remove any material that is accused -- again, without evidence or trial -- of infringing copyright. This has proved a disaster in the US and other countries, where it provides an easy means of censoring material, just by accusing it of infringing copyright.

•    Mandatory prohibitions on breaking DRM, even if doing so for a lawful purpose (e.g., to make a work available to disabled people; for archival preservation; because you own the copyrighted work that is locked up with DRM)

The EFF tears into the leaked material in a post on its website, saying that, “The leaks confirm everything that we feared about the secret ACTA negotiations.”

They continued:

The Internet provisions have nothing to do with addressing counterfeit products, but are all about imposing a set of copyright industry demands on the global Internet, including obligations on ISPs to adopt Three Strikes Internet disconnection policies, and a global expansion of DMCA-style TPM laws.


Disclosure: GamePolitics is a publication of The ECA

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

Better get pirating while I can before ACTA shuts down the internet!

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

And were going to put a Moat around our servers and demand the black knight be kept at the gates ... Ah nothing like going back to the Medieval days and imposing Draconian Laws upon the public.  Maybe instead of just take down notices we can use the Pear of Anguish to force people to confess that they are trying to pirate music and movies; if they die they were innocent if they admit to it they were guilty.

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

Well, goodbye internet, as sadly, if companies want this ,it will more than likely get passed. Despite what many claim, they can care less about consumers.

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

And I still don't get why peole openly support the media mafia....


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

If you're hoping for transparency, you're wasting your time.

As for the leaked bullet points, this is fucked up.  It will destroy many, MANY sites, especially Youtube.

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

R.I.P. The Internet

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

Though we might start seeing the rise of darknets.

It would be funny if all those technologies that the NSA developed for helping people get freedom in China end up being used by people wanting freedom in the US...

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

There's no way this can work.

---

I once had a dream about God. In it, he was looking down upon the planet and the havoc we recked and he said unto us, "Damn Kids get off my lawn!"

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

What this seems to be, to me, when combined with the attack on Net Neutrality, is an attempt by larger businesses to turn the Internet into a purely business venture, where the 'great unwashed' are little more than a minority whose opinions are worthless, rather than the large social network it currently is.

Without wanting to sound like a conspiracy theorist, it occurs to me that the last thing any organisation wants, is for customers to communicate with each other and share their experiences. They'd much prefer a feedback page that they can edit to suit themselves, destroying social groups like youTube, famous for exposing several bad practices by companies, attacking people who publicise problems with companies by accusing them of filesharing and having their page removed without trial, and the DRM thing is just a continuation of the attack on personal property, where companies feel they should still own the stuff you've bought, and should control your ability to criticise them.

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

I wonder what effect this would have on Ripoffreport.com .  That site was a fantastic idea, and it'd be sad to see it go.

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

It is not just companies.. governments do not want popular access to information either.  Even democratic governments are generally against the idea since when it comes down to it, the same kinds of people end up runing things regardless of what structure the government or company takes.

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

ok, this is weird.

first we get the net neutrality bill, which keeps ISPs from abusing their power, and then we get this bill that will let other companies get even more abusive?

Well, on the bright side maybe I can write a song and then repeatedly tell ISPs that companies like EA and activision are pirating it, since I won't need to give them a single ounce of proof that they actually are.

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

Media consumers, quitly even after proven innocent.

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

The most funny part of anti-piracy laws is how they can screw the creator...

 

Example: Metal slug collection for PSP was been discovered to use roms pirated by players. The creator claimed that in fact they really did this, because they lost the source. So, thankfully the game preservation projects saved those games.

 

Now with this law, this mean that for using a illegal rom of your own game to re-release it you will get arrested/fined/punished.

 

criadordejogos.wordpress.com

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency
ACTA is absolutely terrifying and would mean the end of internet as we know it if it passes.
Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

I want that toaster.

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

 That's okay, we'll just block USA off from accessing the real internet so we can have real freedom while you guys do not, but preach about how you have it more than anyone else.

Same Shit, Different Medium.

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency

Countries negotiating the agreement include the U.S., Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, and Switzerland.

So, that would leave... how many countries with this supposed 'real freedom'?

Re: Letter to Obama Seeks ACTA Transparency
This whole development will put democracy ad ACTA.

ZAR.

ECA IconA PUBLICATION OF THE ECA RSS IconSUBSCRIBE User LoginLOGIN / REGISTER

Crispy Gamer




       

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 03/16/10 at 11:45am
JDKJ: Have you tried partnering with an organ grinder? If you do a good job, passerbys will fawn over you and throw change in your tin cup.
Posted 03/16/10 at 10:59am
ZippyDSMlee: JD is jsut pissy cuse he is not getting enough attnetion...hey neither am I damnit!!!!
Posted 03/16/10 at 10:18am
Valdearg: @Cminer: LMAO. I was about to say the same thing. The typical Youtube comment implies they've been at it for years.
Posted 03/16/10 at 10:17am
CMiner: JDKJ: That happened years ago. Look at your average forum poster/youtube commentor/etc for proof.
Posted 03/16/10 at 10:16am
JDKJ: BREAKING: Goodall Institute for Primate Research teaches chimpazee how to type and post to the Internet.
Posted 03/16/10 at 08:39am
ZippyDSMlee: Afirejar:Left you a warm pile in the Venezuela/censorship article. :P
Posted 03/15/10 at 04:05pm
Andrew Eisen: I'm still here and I'm doing a lot of behind the scenes work (as time permits me). But it's true, I've only written one piece under the new GP but if that Facebook/JT bit is the last thing I write for the site, I’d be okay with that.
Posted 03/15/10 at 04:01pm
ZippyDSMlee: I suppose its not inane enough for petes muses*giggles*
Posted 03/15/10 at 03:55pm
PHX Corp: It had the Video Games tag on it, I thought that it had been a video game law that was concerning it
Posted 03/15/10 at 03:54pm
JDKJ: And what happened to "Senior GP Correspondent, Andrew Eisen, reporting from San Diego [and who has a better finger on the pulse of GP's readership than some others]?" Huh? Did he fall victim to the Night of the Long Knives?
Posted 03/15/10 at 03:53pm
Andrew Eisen: No, but my one example was not meant to cover the entire spectrum. Besides, multiplayer is a big part of video games.
Posted 03/15/10 at 03:50pm
Andrew Eisen: PHX Corp - Are you referring to AB 847? I haven't read the bill but the summary doesn't appear to apply to video games.
Posted 03/15/10 at 03:49pm
DarkSaber: 2 mediocre games do not "a big part of video games" make.
Posted 03/15/10 at 03:49pm
JDKJ: I suspect that'll fall victim to the "pass." Wrong side of the fence. It's North Korea we aren't supposed to like.
Posted 03/15/10 at 03:48pm
DarkSaber: Although, following the "MW2 Made Lots of Money" excuse for a story, GP would be hard pressed to justify WHY they passed on it.
Posted 03/15/10 at 03:47pm
Andrew Eisen: DS - Not necessarily. See recent Ubisoft stories.
Posted 03/15/10 at 03:47pm
Andrew Eisen: Zip - Or it will and GP hasn't had a chance in the last couple hours to get to it yet. Or yeah, maybe he’ll pass on it.
Posted 03/15/10 at 03:46pm
DarkSaber: Only if you play multiplayer AE.
Posted 03/15/10 at 03:45pm
Andrew Eisen: Except, aside from following up on an earlier story, GP frequently reports on internet censorship and net neutrality issues (the internet being a big part of video games and all).
Posted 03/15/10 at 03:45pm
ZippyDSMlee: I emailed it in DS, if Venezuela gets covered so should south koera but I gues not :P
Login or register to post shouts