Console Modder’s Appeal Tossed in UK Court

November 10, 2009 -

A UK man found guilty in 2008 of installing mod chips into Xbox, PlayStation, PlayStation 2 and GameCube consoles has seen an appeal of his conviction denied.

Christopher Paul Gilham sold the hacked consoles, which enabled users to play counterfeit games, from October 2003 through January 2006.

The appeal focused on the issue of “whether the playing of a counterfeit DVD involves substantial copying of a copyright work.” Following some discourse on the term “substantial,” the Court wrote:

The various drawings that result in the images shown on the television screen or monitor are themselves artistic works protected by copyright. The images shown on the screen are copies, and substantial copies, of those works. If the game is the well-known Tomb Raider, for example, the screen displays Lara Croft, a recognisable character who has been created by the labour and skill of the original artist.

The Court concluded that:

It is not necessary in future to show that a substantial copy of the game is made in Random Access Memory (RAM), all that needs to be shown is that some copyright work contained within the videogame is substantially copied e.g. the image of a game character.

The Entertainment and Leisure Publishers Association (ELSPA) applauded the decision, saying that it welcomed the copyright clarification.

ELSPA Director General Michael Rawlinson added:

Protecting intellectual property (IP) theft is an important issue for the country’s videogames industry. This judgment strengthens copyright law and will be a significant step in helping us protect the industry.

Text from the full judgment can be viewed here.


Comments

Re: Console Modder’s Appeal Tossed in UK Court

A shame the media mafia managed to buy off another verdict.... Hardware modification is not infringement of any kind its consumers staying smart.Go after those selling software/media illicitly and nothing more.


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Console Modder’s Appeal Tossed in UK Court

And they say that Australia is backwards for our ratings system  (which is admittedly somewhat backwards). At least our parallel import laws allow us to chip consoles for region lock circumvention. 

Re: Console Modder’s Appeal Tossed in UK Court

It seems the next step along this ludicrous line of reasoning would be for courts to decide that game publishers are free to sue computer monitor manufacturers for infringement, for every computer monitor used in gaming is displaying substantial copies of copyrighted characters and designs. If installing mod chips constitutes infringement due to the fact that a mod chip makes possible the unauthorized display of copyrighted material, then so must the making and selling of computer monitors be considered an infringing activity. Furthermore, if the fact that mod chips have legitimate uses (homebrew/imports) is irrelevant, then so must the fact that computer monitors can be used for non-infringing activities such as displaying your own content.

Re: Console Modder’s Appeal Tossed in UK Court

You're such a tool.  Equating a standard output device to modifying a console so that it can play pirated games and unzoned discs it completely asinine.

---

He was dead when I got here.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Console Modder’s Appeal Tossed in UK Court

I must admit, your rationale is very compelling. Your use of the word "completely" in "completely asinine" is truly what clinches the argument, I think.

Re: Console Modder’s Appeal Tossed in UK Court

Heh, current copyright law is the exact same thing as taking out a phone booth with a nuke. It gets the job done but a LOT of innocent people are harmed in the process.

Wars, weather on a battle field or in a courtroom, always harm the innocent. Perhaps we should outlaw cars. They're not intended for illegal purposes, but one getaway or one hit and run should be reason enough for a ban, amirite?

Re: Console Modder’s Appeal Tossed in UK Court

Sounds like this would be in the gray area.

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: Console Modder’s Appeal Tossed in UK Court

He profited off of copyright infringement, how is that gray?

Re: Console Modder’s Appeal Tossed in UK Court

Technically he enabled the possibility, but did not directly infringe upon any IP. While I wouldn't be suprised if 90% of his sales probably went towards modding consoles with the intent to play pirated games; all he did was sell a small electrical component.

Is it the fault of the store you bought the crowbar at if you killed a person with it?

So long as the item in question can perform legal functions, does not directly harm anyones health or well being through legal use, and does not break any existing laws (Dam you DMCA in the US) then I find it hard to believe you can inherently ban things like this. Of course it also depends on the power of the courts; what law did the court find him in violation of? I'm not familiar with the UK's judicial system but can judges there just make up rulings through vague associations?(US has this problem pretty often. Irks me to no end.)

If they want to get anyone it should be the suppliers of the copied games; there should be no real defense or potential rights infringements there.

 

Re: Console Modder’s Appeal Tossed in UK Court

Well, the 'grey' would be that he was not doing any copyright infringment himself (unlike people who, say, pre-load a console with pirated titles after chipping it for sale).

Reading over the actual motion, it is a little scary.  The court notes that mod chips have other uses, but then dirrectly says they are irrelevent.  They also state that the defendents intentions are irrelevent.

The law is looking purely at what other people are able to do with the chips after they leave the defendent's supervion.  Which if it was anything other then IP would be laughed out of court.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Should 'Hatred' have been removed from Steam Greenlight?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
PHX Corp@Adam802 We'll break out the popcorn in June12/19/2014 - 9:23pm
ZippyDSMleeMaskedPixelante: I'm itching to start it too but I will wait till the patch goes live. >>12/19/2014 - 7:52pm
Adam802Leland Yee and Jackson get trial date: http://sfbay.ca/2014/12/18/leland-yee-keith-jackson-get-trial-date/12/19/2014 - 5:24pm
MaskedPixelanteNevermind. Turns out when they said "the patch is now live", they meant "it's still in beta".12/19/2014 - 5:07pm
MaskedPixelanteSo I bought Dark Souls PC, and it's forcing me to log into GFWL. Did I miss something?12/19/2014 - 5:00pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/12/republicans-may-have-plan-to-save-internet-providers-from-utility-rules/ this is intreasting. congress may put net nutrality in to law to avoid title 2 classification12/19/2014 - 2:45pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.polygon.com/2014/12/19/7421953/bullshit-cards-against-humanity-donated-250k-sunlight-foundation I have to admit I like the choice o organization. congrats to CAH.12/19/2014 - 1:51pm
E. Zachary KnightIf you are downloading a copy in order to bypass the DRM, then you are legally in the wrong. Ethically, if you bought the game, it doesn't matter where you download it in the future.12/19/2014 - 12:06pm
InfophileEZK: Certainly better that way, though not foolproof. Makes me think though: does it count as piracy if you download a game you already paid for, just not from the place you paid for it at? Ethically, I'd say no, but legally, probably yes.12/19/2014 - 11:20am
ZippyDSMleeAnd I still spent 200$ in the last month on steam/GOG stuff sales get me nearly every time ><12/19/2014 - 10:55am
ZippyDSMleeMaskedPixelante:And this is why I'm a one legged bandit.12/19/2014 - 10:51am
ZippyDSMleeE. Zachary Knight: I buy what I can as long as I can get cracks for it...then again it I could have gotton Lords of the Fallen for 30 with DLC I would have ><12/19/2014 - 10:50am
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/12/19/marvel-vs-capcom-origins-leaving-online-storefronts-soon/ Speaking of "last chance to buy", Marvel vs. Capcom Origins is getting delisted from all major storefronts. Behold the wonders of the all digital future.12/19/2014 - 9:59am
MaskedPixelanteSeriously, the so-called "Last Chance" sale was up to 80% off, while this one time only return sale goes for a flat 85% off with a 90% off upgrade if you buy the whole catalogue.12/19/2014 - 9:37am
E. Zachary KnightInfophile, Tha is why I buy only DRM-free games.12/19/2014 - 9:37am
MaskedPixelanteNordic is back on GOG for one weekend only. And at 85% off no less, which is kind of a slap in the face to people who paid more during the "NORDIC IS LEAVING FOREVER BUY NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE" sale, but whatever...12/19/2014 - 9:28am
InfophileRe PHX's link: This is one of the reasons the digital revolution isn't all it's cracked up to be. There's also the flip side where Sony can block access to games you've bought if they ban your account for unrelated reasons. All power is theirs.12/19/2014 - 8:52am
MaskedPixelantehttp://uplay.ubi.com/#!/en-US/events/uplay-15-days You can win FREE GAMES FOR A YEAR! Unfortunately, they're Ubisoft games.12/18/2014 - 6:29pm
Papa MidnightAh, so it was downtime. I've been seeing post appear in my RSS feed, but I was unable to access GamePolitics today across several ISPs.12/18/2014 - 6:06pm
james_fudgeSorry for the downtime today, folks.12/18/2014 - 5:54pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician