Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

November 12, 2009 -

As GamePolitics alerted you to late Tuesday, yesterday’s Fox & Friends morning show aired a segment covering Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2.

The short segment was introduced by host Steve Doocy, who began, “A popular new videogame actually allows you (points at camera) to be a terrorist and kill people.” He asked, “Is this fantasy game just a little too real and is it appropriate?” before kicking off a “fair and balanced” debate on the subject with Jim Steyer of Common Sense Media and John Christensen from SlashGamer.com.

Steyer was concerned about the age of the person playing the game, while a flummoxed Christensen attempted to explain the context of the scene in question.

Doocy followed up with the question, “Is it ever appropriate to simulate killing people?”

Steyer replied, “We live in a world of free speech so you can create these games. The issue for violent videogames is there’s no question that there is a correlation between videogame violence and screen violence and aggression in real life. The American Academy of Pediatrics just came out with a statement about that. The violence is the issue… you need to use common sense in terms of using games like this.”

GP: Of course, other researchers have refuted a suggested link between violent games and aggression. Overall, a less than engaging debate. What do you think?

Thanks KayleL


Comments

Re: Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

I agree w/you. Hell Ive never been on tv before & i would get fidgety too! But I'm glad he stood up for my rights as a gamer! Kudos to Jon.

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

"no one wants to give the podum to someone who makes no valid points"

Except Fox, who do on a regular basis.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

Eh, it's Fox & Friends - which Fox itself has admitted isn't part of their news hours, but is "opinion programming" instead. Now, when they provoke people into complaining about MW2, and the news part of Fox News covers it, I'll consider giving a rat's ass about what Fox News has to say.

(see the admission at www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-october-29-2009/for-fox-sake-)

Re: Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

 Has anyone else ever noticed that the name of an organization is usually the exact opposite of what they do/are ... Common Sense Media yet they have no Common Sense ... PETA yet they kill more animals than any other group that has a shelter.

 

Do we just live in a world where the rich think its funny to create a group that has a completely ironic name?

Re: Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

Yes, I think George Orwell's book '1984' started this trend...

Re: Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

 Touche ... you would think being a fan of Orwell I would remember the name of the organization Ministry of Truth ... yet it was changing history.  What is sad is his work was a work of fiction and yet has so much real world implications. 

Re: Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

"What is sad is his work was a work of fiction and yet has so much real world implications. "

That's not sad, IMO it can make a book great.

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

And Fox News is called "fair and balanced" yet they couldn't be any more biased.

It truly is a topsy turvy world we live in... -_-

Re: Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

I didn't expect anything good from this debate, but anyway, kudos to Jim Steyer from saying that "We live in a world of free speech so you can create these games".

Re: Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

 Of course he goes on to claim theirs a correlation between videogame violence and screen violence and aggression in real life.  Granted the word correlation means we have no clue and we are just claiming something ... like me proving theres a correlation between shark attacks and software piracy ... I can skew the information enough to make such a thing look true but only a complete idiot would try to claim shark attacks cause software piracy. 

 

Of course I am such an idiot and I believe in order to stop piracy in the digital world we must declare war on the marine world and take these monsters out =P.

Re: Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

Well, I said "kudos" because here in Europe, people who claim there is correlation use it as a pretext to call for a total prohibition of violent games and jail time for their producers/developers.

By the way, CSM's review of Modern Warfare 2 is available here : http://www.commonsensemedia.org/game-reviews/call-duty-modern-warfare-2

Re: Modern Warfare 2 on Fox & Friends

When you mention that bit about Europe, it makes me sad.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonthe issue is when is doesn't work it can screw over millions in new york city's case. more often than not it is better to let the free market run its course without market distortion.04/16/2014 - 9:36am
NeenekoTrue, and overdone stagnation is a problem. It is a tricky balance. It does not help that when it does work, no one notices. Most people here have benifited from rent controls and not even realized it.04/16/2014 - 9:23am
ZippyDSMleehttp://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2014/04/15/riaa_files_civil_suit_against_megaupload04/16/2014 - 8:48am
ZippyDSMleeEither way you get stagnation as people can not afford the prices they set.04/16/2014 - 8:47am
Neenekowell, specifically it helps people already living there and hurts people who want to live there instead. As for 'way more hurt', majorities generally need less legal protection. yes it hurt more people then it helped, it was written for a minority04/16/2014 - 8:30am
MaskedPixelantehttp://torrentfreak.com/square-enix-drm-boosts-profits-and-its-here-to-stay-140415/ Square proves how incredibly out of touch they are by saying that DRM is the way of the future, and is here to stay.04/16/2014 - 8:29am
james_fudgeUnwinnable Weekly Telethon playing Metal Gear http://www.twitch.tv/rainydayletsplay04/16/2014 - 8:06am
ConsterTo be fair, there's so little left of the middle class that those numbers are skewing.04/16/2014 - 7:42am
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
NeenekoSo "worked" vs "failed" really comes down to who you think is more important and deserving04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
NeenekoThough I am also not sure we can say NYC failed. Rent control helped the people it was intended for and is considered a failure by the people it was designed to protect them from.04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
NeenekoIf they change the rules, demand will plummet. Though yeah, rent control probably would not help much in the SF case. I doubt anything will.04/15/2014 - 1:35pm
TheSmokeyOnline gamer accused of murdering son to keep playing - http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2014/04/15/21604921.html04/15/2014 - 11:50am
Matthew Wilsonyup, but curent city rules do not allow for that.04/15/2014 - 11:00am
ZippyDSMleeIf SF dose not start building upwards then they will price people out of the aera.04/15/2014 - 10:59am
Matthew Wilsonthe issue rent control has it reduces supply, and in SF case they already has a supply problem. rent control ofen puts rent below cost, or below profit of selling it. rent control would not fix this issue.04/15/2014 - 10:56am
NeenekoRent control is useful in moderation, NYC took it way to far and tends to be held up as an example of them not working, but in most cases they are more subtle and positive.04/15/2014 - 10:24am
PHX CorpBeating Cancer with Video Games http://mashable.com/2014/04/14/steven-gonzalez-survivor-games/04/15/2014 - 9:21am
Matthew Wilsonwhat are you saying SF should do rent control, that has never worked every time it has been tried. the issue here is a self inflicted supply problem imposed by stupid laws.04/15/2014 - 8:52am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician