Quantic Dream Exec Talks Violence and Games

Quantic Dream Exec Talks Violence and Games

November 17, 2009

The co-CEO of Quantic Dream has taken the media to task over its presentation of violence in video games, saying that many things are taken out of context, leading to controversy.

Guillaume de Fondaumiere, in a video interview with French game site Digital Games (translated by Benzaie), said that mass media has an important role in forming public opinion, but problems arise when some media "are taking small portions of video game footages out their contexts." 

He said that video games are a form of expression and that violence can be found in any form of expression. He disagrees with the notion that violent games make a person violent:

"Playing a violent game won't turn you into a psycho, a murderer or a serial killer. Most studies show that very clearly on the contrary violent games allow players to express themselves. It's like an outlet for them in a way. All these violent actions that are said to have been inspired by playing violent video games are nothing but the expressions of issues unrelated to video games."

De Fondaumiere, who is past president of the French National Video Game Association,  said that video games are this generation's form of media that is being targeted for its violence, alluding to the fact that books, movies and music have all had their time when that form of expression was criticized on a regular basis.

He did say that violence in games has its limits:

"Violence must not be glorified. When you are talking to designers of the games we talked about, they'll tell you it's not what they had in mind. Sometimes they'll tell you that they wanted to give players total freedom. That players can totally decide to be violent or not and that in fact, by using violence in the game, usually they will be penalized."

Quantic Dream is developing Heavy Rain for the PS3.

Posted in

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Re: Quantic Dream Exec Talks Violence and Games

Great video but those ads were annoying with the popping up every minute.

Re: Quantic Dream Exec Talks Violence and Games

I didn't see them as ads. I saw them as games supposedly representative of video game violence.

Re: Quantic Dream Exec Talks Violence and Games

Or ads for violent games. Targetted advertising and all that.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Quantic Dream Exec Talks Violence and Games

I had random videos scroll up and block the video :(

Re: Quantic Dream Exec Talks Violence and Games

Quantic Dream also developed Omikron, the greatest (aside from the fighting/first person shooting engines) adventure game you never played.

Re: Quantic Dream Exec Talks Violence and Games

HEY I played (and finished) Omikron

Re: Quantic Dream Exec Talks Violence and Games

With the Wii making more people become gamers, in a casual sense, they will start to understand the fun and enjoyable side of gaming that we have all known for a long time.

And there will always be people who will always hate videogames so much that they want to bash it using their mediums like TV and Radio.

But they will never understand because they don't even try to play videogames.

When people say that this game promotes violence, I'd say that this game is talking about violence.

When people say that people who play videogames allot are addicted to videogames, I'd say that people who play videogames allot have a passion for videogames.

 

thanks for the info. I am sure to use that sometime in my own arguments.

 

Re: Quantic Dream Exec Talks Violence and Games

On your first point, I think it's just fantasy to think the moms playing Wii will play anything besides every iteration of Wii Sports and Wii Fit. I don't think that mom is going to go "I enjoyed Wii Sports Resort, let me try Assassins Creed II!" It's unfortnate, but this isn't likely to happen.

Point 2, yes, you're right. But those people are all 70 yr old politicians. All the problems caused by them will be gone in 15 years when they're all retired or dead. It's going to be the greatest day in history when that last politician retires/dies.

You're last point is completely true and logical. Someone whose hobby is re-creating battle scenes from historical wars wouldn't get any hate for spending large portions of their time doing it. Every entertainment medium had it's time in the limelight for all the hate, it's just video games turn.

Re: Quantic Dream Exec Talks Violence and Games

I didn't notice what the media was doing until he pointed it out in this video & what he said about taking the violent parts out of a game & saying it's violent. That is wrong to do. I agree w/Frenchie, it is a passion. I have loved this passion all throughout my life ever since I could pick up & play SNES.

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 02/09/10 at 11:28am
Valdearg: @Gelly: I'm well aware of that. Which is why I said the "Religious Right"
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:28am
gellymatos: You act as though all of us religious people are in the same, large group.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:27am
Valdearg: The absolute LAST thing the Religious Right wants is to have the Government acknowledge that the gay lifestyle is just as equal and acceptable as the straight lifestyle. It goes against EVERYTHING they believe.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:27am
gellymatos: Then look at another picture then. Not all religious groups have the same beliefs on gay rights.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:25am
Valdearg: Therefore, they will try to find any and all ways to slow the inevitable march of equality. Even admirable laws that protect gays from employer discrimination and violent hate fueled attacks are seen as affronts to their beliefs.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:24am
Valdearg: Again, you have to look at the bigger picture. Every political victory that the Gay rights movement scores marches them one step closer to being considered "equal" to everyone else. The religious right doesn't want that. It threatens their beliefs.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:23am
gellymatos: ...paranoid, as lawyers, that the language of the law may do so. But like I said, paranoid.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:22am
Valdearg: They see this as the Government encouraging the "sinful sexual behavior." They don't want gays to score ANY political victory, even one that protects them from violent homophobic psychopaths.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:22am
gellymatos: Oh, hell yes. And nothing annoys me more than that fact. They stray and make real catholics look bad. And yes, they could be...
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:21am
Valdearg: Also, you really think that people who are smart enough to practice law REALLY believe that this law will prevent them from expressing their religious beliefs? The fact is that these guys hate gays, and don't want them to be protected in any way.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:20am
Valdearg: The catholic teachings, perhaps, but certainly, there are PLENTY of Catholics who condone violence and hate. Just like these guys.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:19am
gellymatos: violence or hate against anyone.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:18am
gellymatos: Like I said, paranoia that the law could make it illegal to voice an opinion on gay marriage. And catholics don't condon...
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:15am
Valdearg: Can you find a different reason behind the lawsuit, other than the fact that they want to protect their "right" to perpetrate violence against homosexuals, based on their religious beliefs?
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:14am
Valdearg: The fact is that this Law Center, which specializes in the defense of Catholic Beliefs, kind of like a Catholic ACLU, I suppose, is challenging a law that PROTECTS homosexuals from violent acts motivated by hatred of gay people.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:13am
gellymatos: Again, sorry I jumped the gun like I did.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:13am
Valdearg: @Gelly: It's a liberal blog. Its not designed to be balanced. Does that mean that everything there is completely false, and not worth investigating? Nope.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:12am
Valdearg: To be completely honest, I would argue that that assessment is more biased and farther from reality than the Daily Kos assessment.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:12am
gellymatos: I'm sure the story itself is true, it's just that the site seems to be biased. More so than Fox. And that takes effort.
Posted 02/09/10 at 11:11am
Valdearg: Would you rather I link straight to the horses mouth? Here's the story from the Law Center involved in the suit.
Login or register to post shouts