Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

December 1, 2009 -

While his opponents may have wish he had fled, as previously reported, Edge Games CEO Tim Langdell is back in the news and stirring up more trademark trouble.

Develop notes Langdell’s return and the subsequent removal of Mobigame’s Edge by Mobigame iPhone game from the iTunes Store for the second time. Langdell and Edge Games were not impressed with Mobigame appending their name to the name of the game, telling Develop, “Clearly, if Sony tried to use the mark ‘iPod by Sony’ they would hardly expect Apple not to take action to protect their mark ‘iPod’. In trademark law adding ‘by (name)’ to another company's registered trademark does not mean a company can use that trademark without being guilty of willful infringement.”

An Edge Games statement claimed that Mobigames has had an offer since May to change the name of the game in question, with no money exchanging hands, an offer that was "repeatedly refused."

In September of this year, Electronic Arts turned the tables and targeted Langdell and Edge Games with a Consolidated Petition for Cancellation over a series of trademarks registered to Edge Games, including “The Edge,” Gamer’s Edge,” “Edge” and “Cutting Edge.”

An Edge Games rep (or Langdell himself) told Develop that Edge has filed a petition to dismiss EA’s action, adding, “Despite rumors to the contrary, Edge Games has either won every dispute in the past 20 years over the mark Edge or has settled amicably with the other party ending the dispute with an agreement in Edge Games' favor.”

The Mobigames title in question reappeared in the iTunes store this morning (for the U.S. and U.K. territories), under the new moniker Edgy.


Comments

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

So did this Douche Bag sue the WWE over the Edge Character and his segment The Cutting Edge?

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

No.

The first rule about being a trademark troll is you don't go after people who will fight back.  You need to go after people who either a) don't have the money to fight back or b) are trying to release a product that they have marketed in a timely manner and can't get into a lengthy legal battle.

Vince McMahon and the WWE have both the time and the money (and Vince's ego) to squash Langdell like a bug.

This is why Langdell initially going after EA over "Mirror's Edge" was a bit of a puzzle.  EA has tons of money and numerous highly paid lawyers.  Since they were able to release Mirror's Edge, they now have plenty of time on their hands to smack Langdell around before Mirror's Edge 2 comes out.  Tim should have known not to poke a grizzly bear with a stick.

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

For such a level of sheer doucheness. Lets put him in a cage with a bear (Screw the Grizzly, lets go Kodiak!) and a stick, film that and call it "The Bear's EDGE!"

Sorry, I'm being a bit goofy ATM.

 

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

ok ok I get it I dont know anything about this ... seems it stinks all the same though

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

urghh you shouldnt be able to copy write a word

also this (check the land marks section) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worsbrough I grew up in worsbrough I think he was beaten to "cutting edge" not to mention its a common combination of words

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

Regardless of how one feels about this specific case, please keep copyright and trademark seperate.

Trademark is the exclusive use of a word or phrase within a specific industry.  It is the rule that stops companies from claiming to be eachother or sell eachother's products.  Trademark is why you are able to go into any store and know that what you are buying is built by who you think it is.  The complexity of the company or product name has (and should not) have any baring on it's trademarkability.

The specific part is also why I get irritated at all these 'if I find an example anywhere it invalidates it!' or 'I will trademark 'the' and sue everyone!' remarks.  There are rules in place for what can be trademarked and the extent of the context it applies in.  Edge, while controverial in their overzealousness, is following the right basic pattern for how you apply and protect your companie's trademark.  However they go well beyond the rules which is why they are so widly mocked. 

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

ChaosEdge has interesting comments as usual.

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

TIm Langdell emodies much of what is wrong with the business world today.  He's barely more worthwhile a person as a patent troll. 

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

Oy will one of these edicks get soft and go home already.... oh and soemone lop offs EA's dick while there at it!


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! Stop supporting big media and furthering the criminalization of consumers!! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

Awww, and my "Cease this faggotry" pic has already been used...

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

While I'm wishing for a Facepalm.

 

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

If Apple weren't so damn trigger-happy with its App store then Mobigame wouldn't have had to change their game's name unless ordered to do so by a court of law. I doubt Langdell would have won a trademark suit against Mobigame on a trademark as weak as "Edge". Until somebody finally challenges Langdell in court, he will continue to get away with his abusive behavior.

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

This is the kind of stuff in what copyright laws should be applied with all their weight, when morons like Langdell start to abuse of the system, instead of prosecute people for modding their consoles.

 

They will look up and shout "Give ROFLCOPTERS to us"... and I´ll whisper "NO". The cynical side of videogames (spanish only): http://thelostlevel.blogspot.com/ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

This is a trademark issue not a copyright issue.

Trademark: any name, symbol, figure, letter, word, or mark adopted and used by a manufacturer or merchant in order to designate his or her goods and to distinguish them from those manufactured or sold by others. A trademark is a proprietary term that is usually registered with the Patent and Trademark Office to assure its exclusive use by its owner.

Copyright: the exclusive right to make copies, license, and otherwise exploit a literary, musical, or artistic work, whether printed, audio, video, etc.: works granted such right by law on or after January 1, 1978, are protected for the lifetime of the author or creator and for a period of 50 years after his or her death.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Langdell and Mobigames Still At It

"An Edge Games statement claimed that Mobigames has had an offer since May to change the name of the game in question, with no money exchanging hands, an offer that was "repeatedly refused." "

The issue at hand is how Langdell does business.  Although no money would exchange hands, Edge games wanted credit to Mobigame's work.  Which that have absolutely NO RIGHT TO.  I would refuse as well if I had spent months of hard work making a game and then have some trademark troll try to get producer credits simply because I had named it wrong.

------- Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonit is a video talking about why certain games/products/consoles do well, and others do not. he back it up with solid research.04/18/2014 - 3:56pm
Andrew EisenI'm not keen on blind links. What is it?04/18/2014 - 3:45pm
Matthew Wilsonthis is worth a whatch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyXcr6sDRtw&list=PL35FE5C4B157509C904/18/2014 - 3:43pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician