Price Tag of America’$ Army Revealed

December 9, 2009 -

America’s Army, the free-to-play PC game called an extremely effective recruiting tool, has cost taxpayers $32.8 million to-date.

GameSpot filed a Freedom of Information Act request to find out the game’s budget, and was rewarded with a year-by-year breakdown of costs. The game was initially planned as a five-year long project with a total operating budget of $7.0 million.

Costs for America's Army over the years:

  • 2000 - $3,500,000
  • 2001 - $5,600,000
  • 2002 - $1,862,985
  • 2003 - $2,600,000
  • 2004 - $3,866,482
  • 2005 - $1,288,552
  • 2006 - $4,050,748
  • 2007 - $2,788,137
  • 2008 - $3,887,450
  • 2009 - $3,395,702

Additional, unspecified information (perhaps on future plans for the series or hard numbers on actual recruitment increasing/decreasing as a result of the game) requested by GameSpot was denied, with the Army writing “disclosure of this information is likely to cause substantial harm to the Department of the Army's competitive position in the gaming industry.”

The game was launched on July 4, 2002.


Comments

Re: Price Tag of America’$ Army Revealed

But why spend so much money when games like Modern Warfare are doing all their recruitment for them for free?  Just buy a ton of Xbox 360s, MW2 copies, Live accounts, and let the troops play with people back home.  It would be the same thing for a lot less money.

Re: Price Tag of America’$ Army Revealed

I used to play it for 12 hours straight back when I was high school. Of course w/bathroom breaks & meal breaks. But other than that, I thought the tests were fascinating. & going w/my brother when he was 17 to join the army at the recruitment station......omg.....it was amazing b/c there is an area set up for future soldiers to use AA to see what their Marksmanship score was. & that was all. My brother doesn't play it at all, but plays Counter Strike online a lot. :) But now I am wondering if the online courses my brother has to take to get to his SGT rank soon (which will be online), will be on the AA game (classes only) or a different army.mil site....

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: Price Tag of America’$ Army Revealed

The reason they spent more than the original budget plan is most likely because it has been so successful.

I played it when it first came out and it was a great game back then.  Eventually I stopped playing it because I didn't want to sit through all those tests and whatnot to upgrade my character.

They've released a ton of updates for this game as well as released Xbox and Xbox 360 versions. I doubt that was included in the original estimate.

 

Given it's success I'm sure they'll continue giving it the budget they have been to keep it competitive with other games.
 

http://www.eliteownage.com/nice

Re: Price Tag of America’$ Army Revealed

 The original $7,000,000 budget is laughable when it comes down to it. When the America's Army project was started, development costs were already at a few million, and even then that would be an offline game without server upkeep and maintenance, staffing, regular updates, community moderation and the like to support.

The military being willing to throw money at the project is probably what has made America's Army both an effective recruitment tool and a popular game rather than a national embarrassment.

Re: Price Tag of America’$ Army Revealed

I see it went over the original $7 mill budget in less then two years.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Price Tag of America’$ Army Revealed

so in it's most expensive year it only cost less than 6 million dollars.

On a government level, that's peanuts.

Re: Price Tag of America’$ Army Revealed

For the non-US readers, we (read:the government) just spent a trillion (of our) dollars (that we don't have) on non-sense like why people don't like to wear condoms and they want to do it again..

Re: Price Tag of America’$ Army Revealed

Lol, ya well its not that bad of a game and an effective PR tool. So its a win - win for them to sink more money into.

~Weatherlight~

~Weatherlight~
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenI don't doubt that many are truly interested in journalistic integrity. The problem I'm often seeing is they seem to have no idea how or where to talk about it.09/18/2014 - 11:46pm
Andrew EisenDidn't word that well. Busy at work. I've seen people claim that GamerGate is solely about ethics and transparency in games journalism and then go on to show that what they're really after is silencing those who talk about gender issues in games.09/18/2014 - 11:45pm
Kronodebate. Becaus apparently people who only post on Reddit are supposed to police twitter before they're allowed to question anything about the people involved.09/18/2014 - 10:40pm
KronoI highly doubt many, if any are using journalistic integrity as a cover for harassment. The people harassing are essentially trolls. They aren't interested in subtle. More often it's othe other way around. People use "but X is being harassed" to shut down09/18/2014 - 10:38pm
Andrew EisenAnd exacerbating everything is the fact that all the cries of ethics violations have been obnoxious and easily proven false.09/18/2014 - 8:59pm
Andrew EisenProblem is, I would imagine, the sheer number of people who are using journalistic integrity as a cover for their harassing actions or only bringing it up on the false pretense of journalistic integrity.09/18/2014 - 8:47pm
Andrew EisenHaving said that, I can certainly see how one would be frustrated if they truly just wanted to talk about journalistic integrity and someone said they were one of the people harassing Sarkeesian, Quinn and others (though I've seen no examples of that).09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoThat's been the common refrain, that talk of journalism ethics is just an excuse to harass people.09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoLines like "like a partial compromise with the howling trolls who’ve latched onto ‘ethics’ as the latest flag in their onslaught against evolution and inclusion." are taring everyone questioning the ethics as a harasser.09/18/2014 - 8:43pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Except, none of the articles were talking about gamers complaining about journalist ethics, let alone called them white male misogynists. They were talking about the gamers who were harassing others.09/18/2014 - 8:36pm
Kronomakes plenty of sense. It's rather hard to dismiss someone as a white guy running a sock puppet when they've posted proof they're a woman, or black, or another minority.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat any critics of journalists were white guys that hated women, and could be dismissed as such. It seems to have helped some. It's kind of difficult to maintain the white guy narrative in the face of a bunch of women and non-white guys. So the tag09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat, someone vented on a #gamergate 4chan thread about being dismissed like that. The suggestion they got in return was to organize their own hashtag in response, with #NotYourShield being suggested. Thus the tag came into use to combat the undercurrent09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronomuch more general problem. And while several of the articles were fairly tame, they spured a bunch of people to dismiss any critics of the journalism involved as misogynistic men. Usually with insults aimed at the geek stereotype. After about a week of09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - Not sure what that has to do with anything but yeah, the gender percentages differ depending on how the study defines what a gamer is.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
KronoThe rhetoric pushed by the spearheading articles that the "gamers" complaining about journalist ethics were just angry white male misogynists, insulted a lot of people that were previously fairly neutral. It made it go from a Kotaku problem, to a09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Krono@Andrew I'm not surprised overlap exists. I expect much of it is a rush to jump on the bandwagon, either by reporting on the original articles, or rushing out their own. The point is that was a major flashpoint, much bigger than the reddit mass deletion.09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Sleaker@AE - well the gamer trend was described with stats on Factual Femenist. Only 1 in 7 males plays games 20+ hrs going into college vs 1 in 40 females. So gaming is definitely still male dominated despite fake stats trying to say otherwise.09/18/2014 - 8:30pm
Craig R.Do conspiracies ever make sense? The fact that people are now having to defend themselves against nutjob websites like Breitbart.com shows how far down into the rabbit hole we've all been forcibly dragged.09/18/2014 - 7:05pm
Michael ChandraBut when the mountain obviously exists...09/18/2014 - 5:49pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician