U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

December 10, 2009 -

Want to learn more about U.S. health care reform in a simple program with a quiz-like interface? There’s an app for that.

People Operating Technology has launched the free iPhone & iPod Touch application Death Panel in the Apple Store. Promised to be “100% non-political,” the app’s quiz questions and facts are fed by data collected from the White House website, StateHealthFacts.org, the NCHC.org, and FactCheck.org.

Players take the role of an office holder who “must stand on a virtual platform and answer questions correctly about health care from an anxious public.” Twitter and Facebook integration lets users share their scores too.

People Operating Technology co-founder Jason Petralia stated, “Mobile technology provides a fascinating medium though which businesses and other organizations can gain mindshare. We made Death Panel to shed some light on a hot topic in a compelling way.”

Death Panel also contains a Geo-locational who’s who of congressional members, showing their home state, political affiliation and lobbyist funds received.


Comments

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

</>

-- teh moominz --

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

I'm glad this game is designed to show the real truth about healthcare, rather than the lies and scare tactics that our friends on the right are using.

I've always been a fan of factcheck websites, like factcheck.org and politifact.com, because they are both non-partisan and expose the lies on both sides. The best part, of course, is that it shows pretty empirically that the right has constantly and consistently lied about this healthcare bill from the beginning.

From the utterly insane "Death Panel" idea to Glen Beck's asinine accusations of providing "insurance for dogs" in this bill, and Limbaughs insane idea that Obama wants to "Mandate Circumcision," there hasn't been a single kernel of truth from the right-wing on Health Care since the debate began this past summer.

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

The factcheck.org site also says that pretty much everything that the left has said about "creating jobs" and "not affecting the economy in any negative way" are lies, too.  I haven't heard anything from the left that has come out as having a kernel of truth, either.

Also, the NHCH website is a bit misleading.  They reported that the CBO says the current plan will reduce the budget deficit by 130 billion dollars, and that's true.  However, they neglect to mention that this reduction isn't an actual reduction, it's in relation to the projected deficit that was done a couple of months ago, which the CBO stated that two-thirds of that deficit was caused by the health care plan.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

What they need to do once the bill passes is to create another game called "Get Healthy", then everyone can "Get Healty from P.O.T"

Sorry, I can't help bad jokes.

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

Awww. That doesn't sound like fun. I saw the title and soooo much wanted this to be a game about being a doctor in a socialised public hospital deciding who was to die, and who got to live, in order to keep within your drug budget.

(NB, I am from the UK and I do thoroughly approve of the National Health Service we have here, but I still think the whole ludicrious 'death panel' idea would make for a fun 15-minute flash game or something.)

 

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

Being sincere, a private hospital sounds a lot like the socialized hospital you mention. They are bunch of cheap bastards too.

My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

Would it be right to assume that the health care system there is nowhere near the complete nightmare politicians here in the US are so fond of painting it as?

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

It's not perfect by any means, but it is free at the point of delivery and available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. I've genuinely owed my life to NHS Accident & Emergency wards on at least a couple of occassions.

Plus, if you don't like it (and can afford it!), you can always sign up for a private health care plan, which does have the benefits of having nicer hospital wards and shorter waiting times. However, the doctors and drugs are the same between NHS and private healthcare, so the quality of treatment doesn't differ all *that* much, mainly the level of comfort and efficiency.

Lastly, most big companies provide private health and dental care options, just like they do in North America, so for many you basically get private health care for free. For those who aren't so lucky, to say the NHS is a life-saver would be the biggest understatement ever.

The only massive downside is that it can be badly mis-managed from time to time - but that's what happens whenever you politicians signing off any public service decisions. The NHS probably isn't the best system in the world (i'm no expert on these matters), but it's far from the wost and i genuinely reckon there'd be riots in the streets if any political party suggested the abolition of state-funded health care.

-- teh moominz --

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

The problem is, the "nicer hospital wards and shorter lines" would be illegal under our proposed health care plans.  Reason being, white people in this country generally have more and better health insurance, so they'd be the ones with that, which would be decried as racist.  No, our proposed health care plan would have everyone, public option or privately insured, getting the same crappy care you yourself described in you post right here.

---

He was dead when I got here.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

No offense, bro, but you've got NO idea what you are talking about.

This health care reform doesn't even CREATE government run health care.. Just Government run insurance. People can STILL buy "Cadillac" plans from other insurers. The government option would just provide another competative option, rather than let insurance companies run amok.

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

And the people who buy said cadillac plans will be taxed, as well as the insurance company that provides them.  On top of that, don't forget that the people who pay for their own insurance plan will also be paying higher taxes in general to pay for those on the government option, because the people on the government option are NOT paying their whole plan.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

That's kind of the point, Jedi.

Those who can't afford insurance on thier own will have part of it subsidised, based on need. Thats so that we can stop the rising health care costs due to the treatment and subsequent non-payment of the uninsured.

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

Okay then, let's put it in a way that proves how wrong it is.  Let's say I have health insurance through a private provider.  I'm lower middle class, so it's pretty tough on my budget, but it's better than the public option.  Now you, on the other hand, make more money than me, but your job doesn't offer health insurance, so you get the public option.  You'll pay a lower premium than me, while I'm taxed to pay for your health insurance even though you make more money than me.  That is a situation that is entirely plausible according to factcheck.org.  Explain to me how that's supposed to be fair.  Better yet, explain to me how that's supposed to be more fair than the way things are now.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

In which case, you switch from your private provider and go for the public option - simples! If you really want the extra attention afforded by the private plan, then it's only fair to a pay a premium, regardless of your own personal budget.

It all comes down to choice. Nobody can force you to make cost-effective economic decisions in a free society, but that's what you should do for sure if you had troubles managing your finances.

-- teh moominz --

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

So you're saying that I should switch from my good insurance that I can afford to an insurance plan that isn't as good, just so I'm not paying for two people's insurance?  That's funny, because that doesn't sound like a "choice" to me.  That sounds like somebody like Nancy Pelosi wants to stick it to insurance companies, and nothing more.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: U.S. Health Care Reform Subject of iPhone App

If you can afford your private health insurance package, then where's the problem?

On the flip side, just because somebody earns more than you but chooses to go for the public over the private option, I don't think they should be punished for making that choice.

Plus, you're not paying for two people's medical insurance - you're paying for your own private plan, out of choice, and also contributing to the public option through your taxes, same as everybody else would/does - just as you already do for social security, food stamps and Medicare.

No solution is perfect, but from an outsiders perspective the current US health care system is in grave need of an overhaul, which would neccessarily involve a degree of public funding of some sorts (and a heck of a lot of compromise).

-- teh moominz --
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which Feminist Frequency video are you looking forward to most?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Wonderkarpgot my Reading Rainbow kickstarter rewards....I cant tell if this is a sticker or a bumper sticker.01/30/2015 - 5:38pm
Goth_SkunkAs such, the first playthrough is always going to be the most evocative.01/30/2015 - 3:47pm
Goth_SkunkSo while branching storyline is hallmarked as a feature of the game, the storyline never stays branched for too long. There is a linear story that may branch at points, but each branch always comes right back to the main line further down the road.01/30/2015 - 3:46pm
Goth_SkunkMy biggest gripe about it though would have to be that its replay value sucks. I quickly learned that apart from a few key decisions you make, most choices end up not being relevant because something terrible happens anyway.01/30/2015 - 3:45pm
Goth_SkunkI *love* The Walking Dead. Like I said, I played Season 1 through in one go, and subsequently pre-purchased Season 2 in its entirety sight-unseen.01/30/2015 - 3:43pm
Andrew EisenBy the by, I take it you're a fan of Telltale's Walking Dead? I'm one of the very few who really doesn't like it. Bums me out.01/30/2015 - 3:39pm
Andrew EisenI think we're safe with stuff like Life is Strange, Resident Evil: Revelations 2, and TellTale's games. I was thinking more along the lines of D4. It's genuinely up in the air whether we'll get a conclusion to that story or not.01/30/2015 - 3:33pm
Goth_SkunkUltimately, from this potentially ignorant perspective, it's the gamer who assumes the risk, not the developer. I don't approve. Fortunately, I'm only paying $5 (CDN, no less), so that's money I can easily write off if I'm disappointed.01/30/2015 - 3:32pm
Goth_SkunkIf I'm wrong, and the unthinkable should happen where the developer ends up aborting production of the rest of the episodes, bundle purchasers would be understandably upset. Even moreso if attempting to get a refund turns out to be a hassle.01/30/2015 - 3:30pm
Goth_SkunkThere is an option on XBL to purchase all episodes in a bundle. Pay full price now, get the rest of the episodes as they're released. I would like to think this means that the other episodes are in fact done and ready.01/30/2015 - 3:29pm
Andrew EisenCatch 22 sometimes. Some gamers don't want to buy it if there's no guarantee the whole thing will come out and the whole thing can't come out unless enough people buy the early installments.01/30/2015 - 3:17pm
Goth_SkunkI sincerely hope this trend towards episodic games is not done so because the developer only had enough capital to produce the first 1/5th of the story and is banking on making enough money from the sales of that fifth to produce the rest.01/30/2015 - 3:16pm
Goth_SkunkThat being said, I want to try Life is Strange to get my feet wet.01/30/2015 - 3:13pm
Andrew EisenI'm that way too. I'll wait until the whole thing is out. Same goes for DVDs of TV shows. I'll wait for the season set.01/30/2015 - 3:13pm
Goth_SkunkIf an episodic game is really good, and the time between episodes is more than a week, I'm more inclined to wait for the rest of the episodes to all come out than to try playing it episode by episode at launch date.01/30/2015 - 3:12pm
Goth_SkunkAs someone who played through TWD Season 1 entirely in one day, and then played Season 2 episode by episode when they each came out, I strongly agree with this sentiment.01/30/2015 - 3:11pm
Goth_SkunkFrom what I've been hearing, people haven't been buying it because they're sick of episodic games where they have to wait 6 weeks or more between episodes and they'd rather just wait for the whole thing to come out at once.01/30/2015 - 3:10pm
Andrew EisenNot sure what GamerGate could do to dissuade people from buying a game they'd otherwise be interested in or why it would even want to but I agree, I think the premise is interesting and look forward to learning more about how it actually plays.01/30/2015 - 2:58pm
Goth_SkunkAnd for what it's worth, I saw Life is Strange advertised today on XBL, and the premise looks very, very intriguing. I'm going to buy it today and give it a shot.01/30/2015 - 2:42pm
Goth_SkunkI'm hearing rumours that the recently released game Life is Strange is not selling very well on Steam, and that GamerGate is being blamed as a result. It's just a rumour though.01/30/2015 - 2:42pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician