New Zealand Reworks Three Strikes Plan

December 16, 2009 -

New Zealand will introduce new legislation to Parliament in 2010 seeking to address the illegal downloading and sharing of copyrighted material over the Internet.

Commerce Minister Simon Power indicated that his government favored a three-strike process for infringers, which is outlined in a Cabinet paper (PDF). The new proposal adds in full court hearings and possible fines, replacing a previously proposed measure, which drew criticism, that would have allowed suspected infringers to have their Internet connections terminated without any court oversight.

The new and reworked plan, which usurps the earlier proposed legislation, consists of first allowing rights holders to request that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) give alleged infringers notice to stop their illegal activity. A first notice would warn of infringement and could be followed by up to two more notices.

Following the third notice, the right holder could seek penalties of up to $15,000 at a Copyright Tribunal. If “serious and continued” infringement is continued, rights holders could request a court hearing that might include a six-month Internet account suspension. Those accused can issue counter notices and can also request a hearing.

Powers said that he was, “confident we now have a workable solution.” He added, “A great deal of work has gone into finding a fair, effective, and credible process for the enforcement of copyright against illegal peer-to-peer file-sharers.”

As part of the proposed plan, ISPs will be required to identify an IP address and match it to an account holder, retain subscriber Internet use data for 20 working days and retain data on infringements for a minimum of 12 months.


Comments

Re: New Zealand Reworks Three Strikes Plan

of course they will abuse it urghh what we need is a counter legislation that forces them to create quality products and sell them for what their worth aswell as allowing us to own what we buy (NOT RENT) and sell/trade it if we want to

and to not lie about how good their product is how many games have been absolute SH*t but been lorded as the best thing EVER

OH WOW the graphics are amazing NO ONE makes them this good your gonna love it we spent so much time making this sooooooo awsome we love what we made
 

and then you play it and and URGHH

... ok that was childish of me sorry ahem

Re: New Zealand Reworks Three Strikes Plan

And now we come back to the pirate flame war.  The media developers don't owe you shit.  Stop acting like they do.  If you choose to pay for something, it's your fault if you don't like it and nobody else's.  Maybe you should have done some more research.  As for trading, if you still have a physical copy of what you traded, that's not trading, that's copying.  Copying is illegal, with archival copies being a limited exception.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: New Zealand Reworks Three Strikes Plan

I hadnt slept in awhile when I said that ... still I dont think its so much to ask for them to be actually honest and not just HYPE HYPE HYPE

Re: New Zealand Reworks Three Strikes Plan

This is going to get abused quickly. It may be more fair, but the media companies have too much pull for it to not get abused. Most likely by labeling even the legal use of a torrent client as a strike.

Re: New Zealand Reworks Three Strikes Plan

Not so, because the media company would have to prove illegal activity.  Legal use of a torrent isn't illegal.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: New Zealand Reworks Three Strikes Plan

Well this draft is much more fairer then the last one I'll give them that.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: New Zealand Reworks Three Strikes Plan

I'm curious to know exactly what magnitude must be commited to recieve a response.

I mean, if it's one of those people downloading hundreds of things, and selling them, yeah, nail them with a strike (figuritively, not a SWAT team strike).

But what about the little things?

I won't lie, i've done it before, downloaded the Silent Hill Homecoming soundtrack (couldn't find it anywhere here in the US to legally buy it, though that is no excuse, and i felt horrible about it).

Would the 12 or so songs make a big enough blip? how about just a single one?

Re: New Zealand Reworks Three Strikes Plan

This is part of the problem, from the point of view of the copyright holders, so much as humming a copyrighted tune whilst vacuuming should earn them money, and if your kids hear and you don't have a performers license, you're probably breaking the law.

It's ironic because I've recently had to download some pretty obscure stuff that I couldn't pick up from shops (Bands like The Electric Love Hogs, the original band of Goldfinger's lead singer), and the truth is, if I hadn't downloaded it, the very people complaining about me downloading it would not have printed a special version just for me, or rather, if they had, they would have charged me a fortune for it. Same as you, I'm not a big fan of heavy downloading, bit it does seem to me that their criteria for 'downloading illegal software' is providing traffic to a Torrent site. If this is the case, what happens when I try to download my Eve client via torrents, for the Freespace 2 SCP via torrents, both of which are 'legal', do I get branded as a criminal purely for being in the same room?

Re: New Zealand Reworks Three Strikes Plan

Scary 

Re: New Zealand Reworks Three Strikes Plan

Actually this is far more reasonable than what they originally wanted. They originally wanted to put the internet connection termination in the power of the Copyright holders and the copyright holders alone.

This is a much more fair method. Now copyright holders have to prove infringement in court before internet connections can be cut.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?t=18&v=CbGmrySQLIg looks like Inafune is giving capcom the middle finger.07/02/2015 - 5:05pm
TechnogeekUnfortunately, the shoutbox moves fast enough that I can't find why I got that impression, so if was indeed erroneous I do apologize.07/02/2015 - 4:34pm
TechnogeekBut yeah, as far as my earlier comment re: you and the article, I did get the impression at some point that you felt there should have been some sort of reprecussions for the article's existence.07/02/2015 - 4:34pm
TechnogeekI got expletive-censored for posting something a few weeks back wherein I expressed my shock that I agreed with you about something, Skunk; so you're not the only one being hit with that stick.07/02/2015 - 4:31pm
Andrew EisenI know you don't. And you haven't recently so all's well.07/02/2015 - 4:25pm
Goth_SkunkI don't think I misrepresented anything.07/02/2015 - 4:24pm
Andrew EisenHeavy profanity is not permitted in the Shout box. Words like "moron" are but we ask that our readers not resort to name-calling.07/02/2015 - 4:23pm
Goth_SkunkSo I can't say a 4-letter curse word, but Mechacrash is free to call me a moron. Acknowledgment: Mecha was warned about his conduct, but his post was not edited, as mine was.07/02/2015 - 4:20pm
Andrew EisenWhat people took issue with was your misrepresentation of what the author said. Now that you're criticizing what she actually said, no one has a problem (though they might disagree with your opinion).07/02/2015 - 4:19pm
Andrew EisenThat's not comparable at all. One is advice, one is a rule.07/02/2015 - 4:17pm
Goth_SkunkBut apparently, people seem to take issue with my justification and have been jumping down my throat about it for... 24 hours?07/02/2015 - 4:17pm
Goth_SkunkAnd now we've just had an example wherein I was forced to moderate myself in order to minimize offense.07/02/2015 - 4:16pm
Goth_SkunkThat's what this whole conundrum's been about! I strongly disapproved with the Wired article writer's suggestion and made that opinion known here in the shoutbox.07/02/2015 - 4:16pm
Andrew EisenPlease keep such strong language out of the Shout box. Anyway, that's fine. If there's something you want to write about. Go right ahead. Don't like someone's suggestion? Feel free to say so.07/02/2015 - 4:13pm
Goth_SkunkIf I get a response "this rape scene you wrote was offensive. You should've done it differently. Consider examples A, B, C, or D" I would happily take it under advisement should I decide to write something similar in the future.07/02/2015 - 4:12pm
Goth_SkunkIf I get backlash for such a decision consisting of "this rape scene was offensive," that's fine. If I get criticism like "this rape scene was so offensive, you shouldn't have written it," I'll respond "Go (expletive) yourself"07/02/2015 - 4:11pm
Andrew EisenMatthew - Oh, absolutely. But no one's saying any specific trope or subject should be taboo.07/02/2015 - 4:11pm
Andrew EisenA few have opined that I should have left the "I'm on a whore" line out of my Old Spice Parody video. I don't see why that's a problem.07/02/2015 - 4:10pm
Goth_SkunkHypothetical: If I'm writing a story and in my story there is a rape scene, and that rape scene is present because I want it to be there, and it is very relevant to the story as a whole, I'm going to write it.07/02/2015 - 4:10pm
Matthew WilsonI think it should be criticized for being used badly, but I dissagree with the idea that is should never be used. as far as I am concerned its a story telling tool, and like all tools it can be used in a good or bad way.07/02/2015 - 4:09pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician