Tiger Remains in the Game

January 5, 2010 -

In a blog on EASports.com, President Peter Moore announced that Tiger Woods would remain the face of its videogame golf franchise, ending a month of speculation.

Moore explained the company’s reasoning:

By his own admission, he’s made some mistakes off the course.  But regardless of what’s happening in his personal life, and regardless of his decision to take a personal leave from the sport, Tiger Woods is still one of the greatest athletes in history.

Of course the fact that Tiger Woods PGA Tour Online is nearing release may have played some part in EA’s decision. Removing him from the nearly completed game, never mind extracting itself from a contract with Woods, would no doubt have proven a formidable task.

EA’s decision to stay with Tiger comes in light of AT&T, Accenture Plc and Procter & Gamble (Gillette) all dropping the libido-laden golfer, while Nike, Upper Deck and now EA, have kept Tiger on board.

A Business Week opinion piece says it’s time for Tiger’s sponsors to forgive and forget:

When corporations attempt to set themselves up as moral arbiters, they just end up making themselves look out of touch.

The author argues that in standing by a spokesperson who is going through tough times, “sponsors would emerge with more respect,” adding:

… sponsors have misunderstood why they wanted celebrity endorsements in the first place. They need authenticity, not bland corporate perfection. If corporations aren’t willing to accept that their “ambassadors” are real people, with all the flaws and fallibilities that come with that package, there is no point in having them on the payroll.


Comments

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

We are all human, we often make stupid mistakes like everyone else.

Also companies need to understand that too, because their next business venture is never going to be headlined by Mr or Miss perfect.

 

TBoneTony

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Ill admit I dont know much about any of whats going on in this story but Ill say something anyway (yay internet)

ahem according to what Ive gathered about whats been said here he "slept around" how does that count as a stupid mistake?.

if you bite your tongue while chewing thats a mistake if you lick a lampost in winter and get stuck thats just stupid. (not sure where I was going with that)

unless the guy tripped fell over and accidently stuck his **** in someone Im pretty sure he was doing it on purpose.

it wasnt a mistake it was on purpose the word your looking for is "wrong" regret is all well and good but untill you start making things "right" it doesnt do any good.

accidents can happen again. (Im going to get flamed arent I)

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Mistake: a wrong action attributable to bad judgment or ignorance or inattention

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&defl=en&q=define:mistake&ei=dbNES93hPIiXtgffp7yACQ&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title&ved=0CAcQkAE

The word mistake fits the bill quite nicely.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

I made a mistake how ironic heheh

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Isn't EA's entire business model based on screwing their customers anyway? If any, they should give him more money.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Now perhaps EA could make a game showcasing Tiger's life off the field and perhaps restart the conversation on the Ao rating.

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Glad to hear someone got Tigers back. This whole ordeal was way overblown by the media.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

This times a million. Acting like ****ing cartoon piranha all so their viewers could engorge themselves on the spectacle.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Let the record show that I called this the first time this question was asked.  Again, if they let Randy Moss be on the cover of Madden AFTER getting busted running over a cop while playing PS2 in the drivers seat of his Mercedes while high, they wouldn't give up Tiger, a man who's only known transgression is sleeping around.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Yeah, and not to mention, from what i've seen, he has truly expressed regret for his actions.

The man knows what he has done, it's obvious he feels sorry for what he's done to his wife, especially after withdrawing from the sport, how many other athletes have done that by their own decision.

As far as i'm concerned, barring truly heinous actions like murder or rape, a single mistake should not forever ruin someone's life and forever condemn them to being labeled by their wrong action.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Hell, among some circles, his only transgression was GETTING CAUGHT while sleeping around. I've got no problem with what the man does with his assets, personally, and I think it's pretty shitty that some companies dropped him because of it. The fact remains that he is one of the greatest golfers of all time, and is a pretty cool guy, for the most part.

In addition, I'm glad they kept him as the spokesperson for the golf games.. I mean, who else could they use? Vejay Singh's PGA Tour '10 doesn't roll off the tongue nearly as well.

Re: Tiger Remains in the Game

Phil Mickelson?  Naah.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Who's responsible for crappy Netflix performance on Verizon?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Papa MidnightGoogle+ Integration is coming to Twitch!07/25/2014 - 8:41pm
MaskedPixelanteThis whole Twitch thing just reeks of Google saying "You thought you could get away from us and our policies. That's adorable."07/25/2014 - 2:52pm
Sleaker@james_fudge - hopefully that's the case, but I wont hold my breath for it to happen.07/25/2014 - 1:08pm
SleakerUpdate on crytek situation is a bit ambiguous, but I'm glad they finally said something: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2014-07-25-crytek-addresses-financial-situation07/25/2014 - 1:07pm
E. Zachary KnightMan Atlas, Why do you not want me to have any money? Why? http://www.atlus.com/tears2/07/25/2014 - 12:06pm
Matthew WilsonI agree with that07/25/2014 - 10:45am
james_fudgeI think Twitch will have more of an impact on how YouTube/Google Plus work than the other way around.07/25/2014 - 10:22am
IanCWelp, twitch is going to suck now. Thanks google.07/25/2014 - 6:30am
Sleaker@MP - Looked up hitbox, thanks.07/24/2014 - 9:40pm
Matthew WilsonI agree, but to me given other known alternatives google seems to the the best option.07/24/2014 - 6:30pm
Andrew EisenTo be clear, I have no problem with Google buying it, I'm just concerned it will make a slew of objectively, quantifiably bad changes to Twitch just as it's done with YouTube over the years.07/24/2014 - 6:28pm
Matthew WilsonI doubt yahoo has the resources to pull it off, and I not just talking about money.07/24/2014 - 6:15pm
SleakerI wouldn't have minded a Yahoo purchase, probably would have been a better deal than Tumblr seeing as they paid the same for it...07/24/2014 - 6:13pm
MaskedPixelanteIt's the golden age of Hitbox, I guess.07/24/2014 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilsonagain twitch was going to get bought. It was just who was going to buy it . Twitch was not even being able to handle the demand, so hey needed a company with allot of infrastructure to help them. I can understand why you would not want Google to buy it .07/24/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew Eisen"Google is better than MS or Amazon" Wow. Google, as I mentioned earlier, progressively makes almost everything worse and yet there are still two lesser options. Again, wow!07/24/2014 - 5:43pm
Andrew EisenI don't know. MS, in my experience, is about 50/50 on its products. It's either fine or it's unusable crap. Amazon, well... I've never had a problem buying anything from them but I don't use any of their products or services so I couldn't really say.07/24/2014 - 5:42pm
Matthew WilsonGoogle is better than MS or Amazon.07/24/2014 - 5:33pm
Sleaker@AE - I've never seen youtube as a great portal to interact with people from a comment perspective. like ever. The whole interface doesn't really promote that.07/24/2014 - 5:28pm
Andrew EisenNor I. From a content producer's perspective, almost every change Google implements makes the service more cumbersome to use. It's why I set up a Facebook fan page in the first place; it was becoming too difficult to connect with my viewers on YouTube.07/24/2014 - 4:50pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician