ONR: Gamers Better Terrorist Fighters

January 26, 2010 -

Fighting a war on terror demands that military personnel be able to quickly react and adapt to enemy tactics—traits which improve from playing videogames.

Research currently being undertaken by the Office of Naval Research is showing that videogame training is having “surprising” results in helping military personnel adapt to the challenges of fighting terrorists, according to a story on the Department of Defense website.

Ray Perez, a Program Officer for the Office of Naval Research’s Warfighter Performance department, offered comment on what the group’s research has uncovered so far:

We have discovered that video game players perform 10 to 20 percent higher in terms of perceptual and cognitive ability than normal people that are non-game players.

Using the term “fluid intelligence” to describe such field adaptability, Perez believes that cognitive advances gleaned from playing games can last for up to two and a half years.

He continued:

We know that video games can increase perceptual abilities and short-term memory. They allow the player to focus longer and expand the player’s field of vision compared to people who don’t play video games.

We think that these games increase your executive control, or your ability to focus and attend to stimuli in the outside world.

Perez’s group is looking to advance the integration of videogames into training, eventually hoping to be able to “blur the distinction between training and operations.”


Comments

Re: ONR: Gamers Better Terrorist Fighters

Its a proven statistic that video games also make you have twitchy fingers & you have better reaction time to the outside world. For example, driving. If you were to come close to getting hit by someone & had to swerve around them, you would have faster reflexes than a normal person that doesn't play video games. It is a proven fact. A lot of people I have told this to have discredited what I have said. That's fine, b/c when the people eventually find out that I was right & other gamers that told them, they will look stupid! :) Seriously they will. & I do know that the military uses the trigger happy soldiers behind the screens watching the video footage from the sky from a secret spy plane. & therefore they push the buttons to fire at targets. Just like playing video games, only it's for real. :) What the Defense department it doing is awesome!!! :)

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: ONR: Gamers Better Terrorist Fighters

What's the control?  Are video games really increasing those abilities, or do people who have those abilities gravitate toward games?  I know there was an article up last week to the effect that, to a certain extent, game skill is related to certain preexisting cognitive abilities.

Regarding the last sentence, "Perez’s group is looking to advance the integration of videogames into training, eventually hoping to ba able to “blur the distinction between training and operations.”" -- sounds a little too Ender's Game to me.

Re: ONR: Gamers Better Terrorist Fighters

I do not know aobut this particular piece, but ONR did have some findings showing how introducing games into training resulted in better detection.  So the control was the old training methods, along with 'beofre and after' stats.

Re: ONR: Gamers Better Terrorist Fighters

Speaking from the only firsthand knowledge I have in this matter, I know that most military forces in the west are now searching for gamers to pilot UAVs; traditionally experiences airforce pilots would be selected, but the nature of flying a plane is survival, where as with UAVs it's not the case -- the machine can perform more extreme maneuvers (and suicide maneuvers) without endagering it's pilot, since they're doing it by remote. Gamers have much of the same skill for controlling vehicles remotely, but without the same life-or-death survival instincts that are vital for a successful airforce pilot.

Not exactly Ender's Game, but we're getting increasingly close to remote warfare.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Poll: Is it censorship when a private retailer decides not to sell a particular video game?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
IronPatriotIs everyone enjoying the latest gamergate hypocrisy? Allum Bokhari claimed his "poll" showed gamergate was liberal, but his Brietbart article calls gamergate "conservative." #busted #gamerFAILgate05/29/2015 - 10:41am
PHX CorpI May not be here for Super Podcast action Committee Chatroom Wise tomorrow due to a trip to NYC to see a play05/29/2015 - 10:24am
E. Zachary KnightFinished KungFury. Of the two short films I watched yesterday and today, I think I liked Predator: Dark Ages more. But Kung Fury has its cheesy charm and was quite enjoyable.05/29/2015 - 10:23am
IvresseTotalbiscuit just posted a wtf is... vid of Hatred. Pretty much expected: a mediocre shooter at best that will probaby bore gamers rather than turn them into mass-murdering psychos http://bit.ly/1KCwNE205/29/2015 - 10:15am
Wonderkarpor hell, even take the general concept and try to replicate it with new hallways and floors and make a full game out of it. I'd pay just to keep the original spooky hallway alone05/29/2015 - 9:35am
WonderkarpIf they were smart, they would just change the ending "Silent Hills" Teaser and keep the game out on PS4 as a Peace Offering. It stands on its own.05/29/2015 - 9:34am
MechaCrashNo mention of shoving PT into the memory hole, I see.05/29/2015 - 8:38am
WonderkarpSorry for caps. copy pasted the title05/29/2015 - 8:36am
Wonderkarphttp://www.ign.com/articles/2015/05/29/silent-hills-publisher-konami-issues-apology-explains-mobile-first-future KONAMI ISSUES APOLOGY, EXPLAINS ‘MOBILE FIRST’ FUTURE05/29/2015 - 8:36am
PHX Corphttp://www.gamespot.com/articles/need-for-speed-will-require-an-online-connection/1100-6427672/ Need For Speed Will Require An Online Connection05/29/2015 - 7:54am
Wonderkarpjust be happy and encourage it.05/29/2015 - 7:37am
DocMelonheadSorry about that, but I'm surprise at what IP participate in this discussion.05/29/2015 - 7:25am
E. Zachary KnightIron, I did not Google Search because I figured the ESRB would publish such infor on their site, which is where I looked. http://www.esrb.org/ratings/ratings_process.jsp05/29/2015 - 7:22am
WonderkarpDocMelonHead, don't look a gift horse in the mouth05/29/2015 - 7:21am
E. Zachary KnightDoc, Uncalled for. Please keep things civil.05/29/2015 - 7:21am
MattsworknameThey were discussing the appeals process for Esrb ratings Doc.05/29/2015 - 7:21am
DocMelonheadDid IP post something that isn't related to White Supremecy?05/29/2015 - 7:13am
IronPatriotBut hey, you're welcome.05/29/2015 - 5:23am
Andrew EisenEZK did say he didn't find any info on the appeals process. And if all he did was look at the ratings process part of the ESRB's website, he wouldn't have. That's where I would have looked too. But hey, thanks for being thorough and finding the info.05/29/2015 - 5:01am
Andrew EisenDude, again. I am NOT saying there is no appeals process. THERE OBVIOUSLY IS. All I am saying is that the appeals process is not described in the ratings process part of the ESRB's website.05/29/2015 - 4:59am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician