A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

March 17, 2010 -

If any doubt remains about how lucrative the used videogame market is, news from a company that specializes in the field should remove such misgivings.

A Maryland-based company called Gamers Factory completed a public stock swap with City Language Exchange in late February, while simultaneously executing a private placement with investors that netted the company $3.9 million. The merged company now operates under the name of Game Trading Technologies and is public, trading under the symbol GMTD on the OTC Bulletin Board.

Armed with the new funds, Game Trading Technologies just acquired more than 320,000 used videogames and accessories from a “national retail firm.”

The company brings a high-tech component to the used videogame business; its “game trading engine” provides up-to-date, real-time market pricing for over 10,000 videogame and consoles. The firm says it has “relationships” with GameStop, Best Buy, Wal-Mart, GameFly, Target, Toys ‘R’ Us, Blockbuster, 7-Eleven, eBay and Costco. These companies also “may use” GTT’s game trading engine.

The ability to go public in such turbulent times should provide some inkling of the company’s profitability and indeed, Game Trading Technologies posted revenues of $36.7 million in 2009, up from a 2008 total of $17.0 million. Net income also skyrocketed in year-over-year results, rising from $325,000 in 2008 to $1.74 million in 2009.

All in all an interesting snapshot of the used game market, especially in light of how tight-lipped GameStop is over revenues it derives from the sector.


Comments

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

The profitability is disappointing, as I hate used games. It bothers me that the used game markets gets bigger every year. I feel this way because, of all the people involved in a game, the ones who deserve the money the most, get the least overall; and this is doing nothing but punishing them.

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

Once everyone realizes the value of a website like Goozex.com, the customer will stop getting screwed with GameStop or [insert used game seller]. It baffles me that the gamer is stupid enough to trade in games for such little money.

With Goozex, say I buy Bad Company 2 and I don't like it (God forbid)... I put it up for trade on the site and I get 1000 points (equivalent to $60) to get another brand new game. Since Bad Company 2 is high in demand, it's gobbled up. No more getting $20 from GameStop for a hot game that they'll turn around and resell for $50.

Feel free to check it out, I've saved so much money on used games already with this.

http://www.goozex.com/referral.asp?idr=6194647584958

 

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

You can do pretty much the same thing by selling a hot used game on ebay and you get real money.

Some people just want the instant gratification.

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

Great, now industry types are even more convinced that they need to kill the used market.

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

A games store dose just that pushes game sales, if you take away their make profitability in used sale you remove the store from existence, remove EB/GS and any other game retailer big or small. Would that hurt publishers any? Now I do not mind taxing the sale of used games, digital storage devices,blank discs and internet service 10% and dishing it out to the media industry as long as fair use is expanded to protected the individual to share freely as long as they do not make or move any money off it.

Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/

Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

Actually, the core of Game Trading's business model isn't really buying and selling on the second-hand market. They're actually a service provider that offers other retailers the use of their proprietary "market making" software and algorithm technology to set real-time price quotes on used games, consoles and accessories. That's where they make their profits. 

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

Well when a place like EB buys used copies of new release games for maybe au$20-25 and sells them for au$90-100, its not too hard to make an educated guess as to the profit margin.

New game RRP is $100

Week old game bought from user at $20

Week old used game sold for $90

EB pockets $70 and the developer loses a profitable sale

 

I can see why the industry claims that used game sales are a threat, just such a shame they seem intent on pinning the blame on the end user rather than the real crooks in the matter

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

The problem with this assessment is that it assumes that every transaction is like that and it ignores the piles of copies of used games that they took in and will likely never sell, or sell at a loss, and they have to pay to warehouse, insure, and the opportunity cost of having those games take up space on the shelves.

Don't misunderstand, I'm not saying that used games aren't profitable, obviously they are, but everyone looks at the most profitable case and assumes it's like that across the board, and it isn't.

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

On top of that is subsidizes the New games market. Retailer profits on New games and systems are very narrow. Add on top of that price drops of games and systems and that profit get's eaten pretty quickly. So any profit from used games has to go into recovering costs associated with stocking new games.

Big box stores like Walmart, Target and Best buy don't have to worry as much because they carry enough other merchandise to cover those costs without having to deal in used games.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

I really don't feel there are any "crooks" in this. The RRP is higher that the perceived value of the product - $80 and $90 respectively. EB gives the users options to buy the product at the cost in which they value it.

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenOnce again, MaskedPixelante, I have no idea what the hell you're talking about. Are you talking about the Wii remake in 2010? The PS3/360 enhanced port of the remake in 2011? Something new? Please, for the love of fluffy kittens, provide a damn link.08/20/2014 - 9:57am
MaskedPixelanteSo, if I finish this game Activision claims is the GoldenEye remake, but looks suspiciously like a rejected CoD game, do I get the REAL GoldenEye remake?08/20/2014 - 8:37am
Papa MidnightWii U Games finding Solidarity with PC Gamers :(08/19/2014 - 6:09pm
Zenbuy all of the bad DLC before they even showed the main content everyone was waiting for. I paid for it, I wanted it, and I got tossed aside.08/19/2014 - 4:10pm
ZenIanC: Yep, both Call of Duty games did the same thing holding back all DLC and then releasing the day one map 2 YEARS later out of the blue. Why play what they won't support. Warner Bros canceled their DLC after promising it because Wii U owners didn't08/19/2014 - 4:09pm
Andrew EisenShe's the developer of Depression Quest. It's an interesting game (although I wouldn't call it fun) and you can check it out for free at depressionquest.com.08/19/2014 - 2:48pm
Sleakerwhat's all this Zoe quinn stuff all over and should I even bother looking it up?08/19/2014 - 2:37pm
IanCExactly Zen. The third one had random delays to the DLC and they just came out seemingly at random with no warning, and the 4th they didn't even bother.08/19/2014 - 2:31pm
ZenI may have bought both AC games on Wii U, but WHY would anyone be expected to get the game when they came out MONTHS before release that they were skipping DLC and ignoring the game? They poisoned the market on themselves then blamed Nintendo players.08/19/2014 - 1:27pm
Papa MidnightIn review, that's fair, Andrew. I just tend to take Gawker articles with a lot of salt, and skepticism.08/19/2014 - 12:07pm
Matthew WilsonFor one has a English speaking support team for devs. Devs have said any questions they have, were translated in to Japanese. then back in to English. 08/19/2014 - 11:41am
Adam802they need to realize the "wii-fad" era is pretty much over and start rebooting some old great franchises like they are doing with star fox08/19/2014 - 11:39am
Adam802unfortunatly, this seems to represent 3rd party's position on the wiiU in general. Nintendo has always sucessfully relied on 1st party but now since 3rd parties and console "power" are so important this gen, they're in trouble.08/19/2014 - 11:38am
IanCOkay, so what can Nintendo do to these 3rd parties? Huh? If a company release games late with missing content then of course it won't sell. Seems simple to me.08/19/2014 - 11:25am
Andrew EisenSakurai and Co. REALLY need to go back in there and re-pose Samus. She is so incredibly broken.08/19/2014 - 11:06am
ZippyDSMleeUntill Nin starts paying out the azz or doing much much more to help 3rd party games development, the WIIU is dead in the water.....08/19/2014 - 11:03am
ZippyDSMleehttps://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=316135481893472&id=22417313775637408/19/2014 - 11:02am
ZippyDSMlee*gets out the popcorn* this will be fun08/19/2014 - 11:01am
Andrew EisenIt's not as simple as "Nintendo gamers don't buy AC games."08/19/2014 - 11:01am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician