A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

March 17, 2010 -

If any doubt remains about how lucrative the used videogame market is, news from a company that specializes in the field should remove such misgivings.

A Maryland-based company called Gamers Factory completed a public stock swap with City Language Exchange in late February, while simultaneously executing a private placement with investors that netted the company $3.9 million. The merged company now operates under the name of Game Trading Technologies and is public, trading under the symbol GMTD on the OTC Bulletin Board.

Armed with the new funds, Game Trading Technologies just acquired more than 320,000 used videogames and accessories from a “national retail firm.”

The company brings a high-tech component to the used videogame business; its “game trading engine” provides up-to-date, real-time market pricing for over 10,000 videogame and consoles. The firm says it has “relationships” with GameStop, Best Buy, Wal-Mart, GameFly, Target, Toys ‘R’ Us, Blockbuster, 7-Eleven, eBay and Costco. These companies also “may use” GTT’s game trading engine.

The ability to go public in such turbulent times should provide some inkling of the company’s profitability and indeed, Game Trading Technologies posted revenues of $36.7 million in 2009, up from a 2008 total of $17.0 million. Net income also skyrocketed in year-over-year results, rising from $325,000 in 2008 to $1.74 million in 2009.

All in all an interesting snapshot of the used game market, especially in light of how tight-lipped GameStop is over revenues it derives from the sector.


Comments

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

The profitability is disappointing, as I hate used games. It bothers me that the used game markets gets bigger every year. I feel this way because, of all the people involved in a game, the ones who deserve the money the most, get the least overall; and this is doing nothing but punishing them.

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

Once everyone realizes the value of a website like Goozex.com, the customer will stop getting screwed with GameStop or [insert used game seller]. It baffles me that the gamer is stupid enough to trade in games for such little money.

With Goozex, say I buy Bad Company 2 and I don't like it (God forbid)... I put it up for trade on the site and I get 1000 points (equivalent to $60) to get another brand new game. Since Bad Company 2 is high in demand, it's gobbled up. No more getting $20 from GameStop for a hot game that they'll turn around and resell for $50.

Feel free to check it out, I've saved so much money on used games already with this.

http://www.goozex.com/referral.asp?idr=6194647584958

 

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

You can do pretty much the same thing by selling a hot used game on ebay and you get real money.

Some people just want the instant gratification.

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

Great, now industry types are even more convinced that they need to kill the used market.

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

A games store dose just that pushes game sales, if you take away their make profitability in used sale you remove the store from existence, remove EB/GS and any other game retailer big or small. Would that hurt publishers any? Now I do not mind taxing the sale of used games, digital storage devices,blank discs and internet service 10% and dishing it out to the media industry as long as fair use is expanded to protected the individual to share freely as long as they do not make or move any money off it.

Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/

Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

Actually, the core of Game Trading's business model isn't really buying and selling on the second-hand market. They're actually a service provider that offers other retailers the use of their proprietary "market making" software and algorithm technology to set real-time price quotes on used games, consoles and accessories. That's where they make their profits. 

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

Well when a place like EB buys used copies of new release games for maybe au$20-25 and sells them for au$90-100, its not too hard to make an educated guess as to the profit margin.

New game RRP is $100

Week old game bought from user at $20

Week old used game sold for $90

EB pockets $70 and the developer loses a profitable sale

 

I can see why the industry claims that used game sales are a threat, just such a shame they seem intent on pinning the blame on the end user rather than the real crooks in the matter

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

The problem with this assessment is that it assumes that every transaction is like that and it ignores the piles of copies of used games that they took in and will likely never sell, or sell at a loss, and they have to pay to warehouse, insure, and the opportunity cost of having those games take up space on the shelves.

Don't misunderstand, I'm not saying that used games aren't profitable, obviously they are, but everyone looks at the most profitable case and assumes it's like that across the board, and it isn't.

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

On top of that is subsidizes the New games market. Retailer profits on New games and systems are very narrow. Add on top of that price drops of games and systems and that profit get's eaten pretty quickly. So any profit from used games has to go into recovering costs associated with stocking new games.

Big box stores like Walmart, Target and Best buy don't have to worry as much because they carry enough other merchandise to cover those costs without having to deal in used games.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: A Look Inside the Profitability of Used Games

I really don't feel there are any "crooks" in this. The RRP is higher that the perceived value of the product - $80 and $90 respectively. EB gives the users options to buy the product at the cost in which they value it.

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
InfophileReference for my comment earlier about Dan Aykroyd in the new Ghostbusters: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/jul/15/ghostbusters-call-dan-aykroyd-for-cameo08/03/2015 - 6:00am
benohawkI hope the new ghostbusters is good regardless, but I also expect it to have to surpass the orignal for people to acknowledge that.08/03/2015 - 1:37am
benohawkMecha, those changes are also some of the bigger complaints I've heard about the Abrams Star Trek movie.08/03/2015 - 1:35am
MechaTama31https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU_D96AdK0M <-- Letterman interview with Bill Murray, he seems to have a similar opinion to mine about the pink-slime movie.08/02/2015 - 11:27pm
MechaTama31I don't think it's as big a deal as you think, matts. After all, JJ Abrams' Star Trek removed the original cast (mostly) and changed the formula significantly. If the movie is enjoyable, people will enjoy it.08/02/2015 - 11:23pm
MattsworknameDoc: Hope he recovers soon.08/02/2015 - 7:49pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.pcgamer.com/what-directx-12-means-for-gamers-and-developers/#page-1 by Peter Thoman, and better known by the name Durante. he talks about dx12 in detail08/02/2015 - 7:45pm
DocMelonheadIGF's Chairman resigns due to cancer: http://igf.com/2015/07/letter_from_the_chairman_so_lo.html08/02/2015 - 6:46pm
Matthew Wilsonit wont let me update it, so the title is Tifa's Breasts Too Big for the FF7 Remake?08/02/2015 - 6:14pm
Andrew EisenRemember, when linking videos, please tell us what it is (title usually words) in addition to who it's from.08/02/2015 - 6:05pm
Matthew Wilsonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxVv7pbqXvY a interesting video video by Gaijin Goombah08/02/2015 - 4:54pm
MattsworknameInfo: Well thats something at least08/02/2015 - 3:04pm
Infophile@Matt: Apparently Dan Aykroyd actually is involved. We don't know how yet, though, but he's apparently going to be in the movie in some way.08/02/2015 - 4:17am
MattsworknameI still hold that not having the origonal cast invovled in any way hurts this movie, and unless the 4 actresses in the lead roles can some how measure up to the comic timing of the origonal cast, i just don't see it being a success08/02/2015 - 12:46am
MattsworknameMecha: regardless of what you think of it, GB 2 was a finanical success and for it time did well with audiances ,even if it wasnt as popular as the first08/02/2015 - 12:45am
MechaTama31I think they're better off trying to do something different, than trying to be exactly the same and having every little difference held up as a shortcoming. Uncanny valley.08/01/2015 - 11:57pm
MechaTama31Having the original cast didn't do much for... that pink-slimed atrocity which we must never speak of.08/01/2015 - 11:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew: If the new ghostbusters bombs, I cant help but feel it'll be cause it removed the origonal cast and changed the formula to much08/01/2015 - 8:31pm
Andrew EisenNot the best look but that appears to be a PKE meter hanging from McCarthy's belt.08/01/2015 - 7:34pm
Matthew Wilsonwhy, let me guess it runes like crap?08/01/2015 - 7:29pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician