Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

March 26, 2010 -

Peter Watts, narrative designer for Homeworld 2, Crysis 2, and the Big Mutha Truckers series, who had a run in with U.S. Customs officers on the U.S./Canadian boarder last December, has been convicted of assaulting, resisting, and obstructing a Customs and Border Protection officer. 

Watts, who hails from Toronto, was crossing the bridge to Canada when he was stopped for a random inspection on the American side. According to his lawyer, Watts was beaten several times, and then pepper sprayed in the face.

Watts continues to protest his innocence but claims that he will accept the outcome of the case:

I have no complaints about the jury. The fact that it took them so bloody long to deliberate suggests to me that they took their job seriously. Based on what little I could tell during the selection process, they seemed like decent folks. And while I profoundly disagree with their verdict, I can certainly see how they arrived at it, given the constraints of the statute.

Watts faces a possible three-year prison term and fines of $5,000 at his April 24th sentencing.


Comments

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

Ok, so wouldn't accepting the outcome of the case be considered as guilty?

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

*Ahem*

Fuck tha police
Comin straight out the underground
Young nigga got it bad cuz I'm brown
And not the other color so police think
They have the authority to kill a minority

Fuck that shit, cuz I ain't tha one
For a punk muthafucka with a badge and a gun
To be beatin on, and throwin in jail
We could go toe to toe in the middle of a cell

Fuckin with me cuz I'm a teenager
With a little bit of gold and a pager
Searchin my car, lookin for the product
Thinkin every nigga is sellin narcotics

Not all cops, mind you, but the ones that abuse their power and THEN get a guy sentenced to some bullshit "obstruction" charge. It is very clear that Watt is innocent in this, and I pray that the border officer gets just desserts (hopefully through the legal system, but even a bad case of karma would suffice), and I also hope that Watts appeals this by arguing that "obstruction" was not done in this case.

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

Yep, it's very clear he's innocent.  That's why he's going to jail, right?

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

It's very clear that he did nothing wrong and should not be sentenced, and that the only reason that the jury sentenced him is because:

"Even members of the jury, who did convict him, have felt they felt constrained by the words of the law.  None deny that he did what he did (not obey in a timely manner)."

So, yes, he's innocent. He "committed a crime" because he didn't sit down fast enough after getting BEATEN UP BY A COP.

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

If you violate the letter of the law, you violate the law.  Twelve people unanimously voted that he was guilty of violating the law, based on the letter of the law.  This isn't innocence, it's guilt.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

Just because something is "against the law" doesn't mean that it should be. I'm arguing that while he violated the letter of the law, he didn't do anything wrong and thus shouldn't be punished.

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

While he is, unless the conviction is turned, guilty of an unlawful act (no, he is not innocent), doesn't mean he is wrong or had any choice in the matter. Laws are not perfects, and while they are better than nothing, I believe in this specific occasion, I'll side with most and say the outcome SHOULDN'T be jail and/or fine. What it'll be is something entirelly different. Also, THE LAW does make mistake. Not as often as it gets it right, but our systems of law are faillible at best.

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

He absolutely had a choice in the matter.  He could have chosen to do as he was told, thereby NOT breaking the law.  Instead, he just stood there asking why, which is what broke the law in the first place.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

He may be guilty of "committing a crime," but he's not guilty of doing anything wrong, is what I'm saying. (The English language is too vague sometimes =/)

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

-Optimum est pati quod emendare non possis-It is best to endure what you cannot change-

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

That I can agree with, to a certain extent, but "not doing anything wrong" and being innocent are not always the same thing.

---

You KILL Vampires. You don't DATE them.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

I think this is what Watts was convicted under:

750.81d Assaulting, battering, resisting, obstructing, opposing person performing duty; felony; penalty; other violations; consecutive terms; definitions.

(1) Except as provided in subsections (2), (3), and (4), an individual who assaults, batters, wounds, resists, obstructs, opposes, or endangers a person who the individual knows or has reason to know is performing his or her duties is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 2 years or a fine of not more than $2,000.00, or both.

 

(a) "Obstruct" includes the use or threatened use of physical interference or force or a knowing failure to comply with a lawful command.

If I've got the right law, I don't know how he could be facing up to 3 years and $5k in fines unless he somehow caused "a bodily injury requiring medical attention or medical care."

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

Just to clarify, in clear terms:

He was convicted of obstruction. He was not convicted of assault.

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

Yeah but that wouldn't be sensationalist enough for new improved GP.

--------------------------------------------------

I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

-------------------------------------------------- I LIKE the fence. I get 2 groups to laugh at then.

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

Someone has anger issues >>


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

At the risk of joining the pedantic folk all over the net where this is being talked about, Mr. Watts was convicted of obstructing/resisting a lawful order from the customs officials (which doesn't require violence to be convicted of).

The "choking" was disproved.  There was no violence done by Mr. Watts. There was obstruction/resistance which was that he didn't follow instructions.  Even members of the jury, who did convict him, have felt they felt constrained by the words of the law.  None deny that he did what he did (not obey in a timely manner).

The Observer is guilding the lily with "assault".  He was accused of it, but it was disproven.

I honestly don't know what I would have done in his position.  Probably would have been intimidated and just let it happen.

 

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

I'd prefer trial transcripts but this from Watts's blog is nevertheless interesting:

"What constitutes “failure to comply with a lawful command” is open to interpretation... So what it came down to, ultimately, was those moments after I was repeatedly struck in the face by Beaudry (an event not in dispute, incidentally). After Beaudry had finished whaling on me in the car, and stepped outside, and ordered me out of the vehicle; after I’d complied with that, and was standing motionless beside the car, and Beaudry told me to get on the ground — I just stood there, saying “What is the problem?”, just before Beaudry maced me.

And that, said the Prosecutor in her final remarks — that, right there, was failure to comply. That was enough to convic...

Whether that’s actual noncompliance or simply slow compliance is, I suspect, what the jury had to decide. That’s what they did, and while I think they made the wrong decision I’m obviously not the most impartial attendee at this party."

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

I qiah for the best possible outcome for Mr. Watts.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

"Qiah"?

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Writer Found Guilty of Border Assault

Odd I know I typed down hope and hot Qiah.  It even showed hope on the preview screen for me.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Should 'Hatred' have been removed from Steam Greenlight?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.businessinsider.com/xbox-one-virtual-reality-headset-will-compete-with-oculus-rift-2014-12 can a xbo even handle doing vr?12/21/2014 - 10:48pm
PHX Corp@Adam802 We'll break out the popcorn in June12/19/2014 - 9:23pm
ZippyDSMleeMaskedPixelante: I'm itching to start it too but I will wait till the patch goes live. >>12/19/2014 - 7:52pm
Adam802Leland Yee and Jackson get trial date: http://sfbay.ca/2014/12/18/leland-yee-keith-jackson-get-trial-date/12/19/2014 - 5:24pm
MaskedPixelanteNevermind. Turns out when they said "the patch is now live", they meant "it's still in beta".12/19/2014 - 5:07pm
MaskedPixelanteSo I bought Dark Souls PC, and it's forcing me to log into GFWL. Did I miss something?12/19/2014 - 5:00pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/12/republicans-may-have-plan-to-save-internet-providers-from-utility-rules/ this is intreasting. congress may put net nutrality in to law to avoid title 2 classification12/19/2014 - 2:45pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.polygon.com/2014/12/19/7421953/bullshit-cards-against-humanity-donated-250k-sunlight-foundation I have to admit I like the choice o organization. congrats to CAH.12/19/2014 - 1:51pm
E. Zachary KnightIf you are downloading a copy in order to bypass the DRM, then you are legally in the wrong. Ethically, if you bought the game, it doesn't matter where you download it in the future.12/19/2014 - 12:06pm
InfophileEZK: Certainly better that way, though not foolproof. Makes me think though: does it count as piracy if you download a game you already paid for, just not from the place you paid for it at? Ethically, I'd say no, but legally, probably yes.12/19/2014 - 11:20am
ZippyDSMleeAnd I still spent 200$ in the last month on steam/GOG stuff sales get me nearly every time ><12/19/2014 - 10:55am
ZippyDSMleeMaskedPixelante:And this is why I'm a one legged bandit.12/19/2014 - 10:51am
ZippyDSMleeE. Zachary Knight: I buy what I can as long as I can get cracks for it...then again it I could have gotton Lords of the Fallen for 30 with DLC I would have ><12/19/2014 - 10:50am
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/12/19/marvel-vs-capcom-origins-leaving-online-storefronts-soon/ Speaking of "last chance to buy", Marvel vs. Capcom Origins is getting delisted from all major storefronts. Behold the wonders of the all digital future.12/19/2014 - 9:59am
MaskedPixelanteSeriously, the so-called "Last Chance" sale was up to 80% off, while this one time only return sale goes for a flat 85% off with a 90% off upgrade if you buy the whole catalogue.12/19/2014 - 9:37am
E. Zachary KnightInfophile, Tha is why I buy only DRM-free games.12/19/2014 - 9:37am
MaskedPixelanteNordic is back on GOG for one weekend only. And at 85% off no less, which is kind of a slap in the face to people who paid more during the "NORDIC IS LEAVING FOREVER BUY NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE" sale, but whatever...12/19/2014 - 9:28am
InfophileRe PHX's link: This is one of the reasons the digital revolution isn't all it's cracked up to be. There's also the flip side where Sony can block access to games you've bought if they ban your account for unrelated reasons. All power is theirs.12/19/2014 - 8:52am
MaskedPixelantehttp://uplay.ubi.com/#!/en-US/events/uplay-15-days You can win FREE GAMES FOR A YEAR! Unfortunately, they're Ubisoft games.12/18/2014 - 6:29pm
Papa MidnightAh, so it was downtime. I've been seeing post appear in my RSS feed, but I was unable to access GamePolitics today across several ISPs.12/18/2014 - 6:06pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician