Latest U.S. Military Interactive Training Methods Detailed

April 8, 2010 -

As the U.S. Military continues to implement interactive training as a means to prepare its members for combat, the Future Immersive Training Environment (FITE) team hosted a conference call today in order to discuss a pair of new training initiatives.

Clark Lethin, of the Office of Naval Research, began by noting that FITE’s focus was on training small units, or “squads of 10-13 soldiers, marines, sailors or airmen,” with an emphasis on improving team unity, unit cohesion, unit decision making and communication skills. The first new training initiative, which has been completed, revolves around a personal virtually reality system.

Lethin explained, “An individually worn virtual reality system with helmet-mounted display and a weapon with a toggle switch on it that allows you to locomote through the virtual world… then we have sounds tied into that system, as well as a shock device that will receive shock if these men are hit or wounded by any kind of connectict event.”

The second cutting-edge training method, which is still under development, is billed as a “mixed-reality facility-based system.” Lethin described it further, “The infantry immersive trainer at Camp Pendleton is a prototype system that’s basically inside an abandoned warehouse with a set that’s now creating an Afghan scenario and is populated with role-players, special effects, avatar projections on the wall… that’s its current state.”

The group is exploring improvements to the current setup, such as implementing voice recognition, replacing role-players with animatronics (to reduce costs) and developing a state of the art infantry After Action Review (AAR) system.

The mixed-reality facility-based system offers new challenges for trainees explained Lethin, “This mixed reality environment takes into account the complexity of the battlefield and gets away from a single task training methodology to a multitask complex training methodology.”

Ensuring that the training environments are safe and productive is extremely important to its creators. To that end, cognitive psychologists, human behaviorists and training experts are constantly involved, offering feedback. The training methods are also subject to independent assessment by the Joint Testing Assessment Agency (JTAA).

Feedback from returning combat veterans was also “critically important,” to the success of the program said Lethin.

Jay Reist, of the United States Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM), on how today’s young soldiers take to the new training methods:

Because of the generation that these young men come from, they adapt very quickly to this technology, they understand it and they are very comfortable in using it, not as a game, but as a training system.

Do the training methods feel real to trainees? Reist stated, “We also added a layer to do some measurement within stress inoculation, through heart-beat measurement. The system proves out to be very effective in creating a realistic immersion environment and that was validated through the stress inoculation piece that we put in play."

The mixed-reality facility-based system is expected to be ready for demonstration this September.


Comments

Re: Latest U.S. Military Interactive Training Methods ...

This will get more men & women involved in joining the military definitely. This sounds like fun! :D

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: Latest U.S. Military Interactive Training Methods ...

"… then we have sounds tied into that system, as well as a shock device that will receive shock if these men are hit or wounded by any kind of connectict event.”

Um...did you by chance mean, "kinetic?"

"HEY! LISTEN!"

"HEY! LISTEN!"

Re: Latest U.S. Military Interactive Training Methods ...

Maybe I am bais, but I find the fun part of this project to be less the mixed reality part, and more the back end AI ^_^

Re: Latest U.S. Military Interactive Training Methods ...

Same here, but that's because a friend of mine works on this project on the AI.

 

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

~~All Knowledge is Worth Having~~

Re: Latest U.S. Military Interactive Training Methods ...

Oh?  Which group?

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Poll: Is it censorship when a private retailer decides not to sell a particular video game?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenBut hey, misrating less than five out of thousands of game ain't too bad a track record. No one's perfect.05/28/2015 - 3:32pm
Andrew EisenIt's a racing game. Despite what the ESRB says, there's no gore and it's hard to consider it violent. Yeah, there's supposed to be a driver in the vehicle and they do explode when they crash and there is a slight bloodstain when they do but come on.05/28/2015 - 3:30pm
Wonderkarpnever played it....atleast I dont think. May have rented it once from Blockbuster05/28/2015 - 3:27pm
Andrew EisenAnd I STILL say the ESRB misrated Forsaken 64. There is absolutely no reason that should be rated M.05/28/2015 - 3:23pm
Andrew EisenI just hope there a children and small animals in the game. Like dogs and cats. And elderly people on walkers and in wheelchairs.05/28/2015 - 3:20pm
Andrew EisenOh you meant "would have gotten an M rating 15 years ago" not "an M15 rating years ago." Oops!05/28/2015 - 3:19pm
Wonderkarpbut whatever. its a moot point. I'm curious if the game allows mods. I'd make the blood confetti with rainbows :P Turn the....is he really a protagonist?.... into Nathan Explosion cause seriously. Brendan Smalls gonna sue somebody05/28/2015 - 3:17pm
WonderkarpI know M is 17, but M can get sold in Walmart or Target, but they wont carry AO05/28/2015 - 3:14pm
Andrew EisenM is 17 but whatever. I'm wondering why Hatred still hasn't shown up in the ESRB's database.05/28/2015 - 3:13pm
Wonderkarpsomething like that, yeah. If like what Matthew said. "How did it get a AO rating to start with?" in comparison to games like Postal. If Postal gets an M and Hatred gets an AO, what other games could get AO that would have gotten an M 15 years ago?05/28/2015 - 3:11pm
Matthew Wilson@Wonderkarp the slippery slope is a fallacy. 2 Australian is bound by law, the esrb is not.05/28/2015 - 3:10pm
Andrew EisenKarp - I'm not following. Are you concerned that even more games are going to be rated AO or something?05/28/2015 - 3:08pm
WonderkarpI'm more worried that its a slippary slope to more Australian style ratings strictness.05/28/2015 - 3:06pm
Matthew Wilsontranslation the media overreacted to Hatred , and wrote a bunch of click bait article. I agree with the reviewer. how did it get a AO rating to start with?05/28/2015 - 3:00pm
Andrew EisenDestructoid has the first review of Hatred that I've seen. http://www.destructoid.com/review-hatred-292912.phtml05/28/2015 - 2:54pm
Wonderkarptransformers was so disapointing. I liked the first one because of the potential of the series, but then......ugh. shoot me now05/28/2015 - 1:52pm
james_fudgeGod I hate those Transformers movies so much.05/28/2015 - 1:43pm
Andrew EisenDefinitely a contender!05/28/2015 - 1:40pm
E. Zachary KnightTwilight? It made almost as much as the Transformers movies and is absolutely terrible.05/28/2015 - 1:36pm
Andrew EisenDevin Faraci over at Birth.Movies.Death calls the Transformers movies "the worst successful franchise in the history of motion pictures." I was like "oh, come on!" but I realized I couldn't think of a successful franchise that's worse. Can you?05/28/2015 - 1:26pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician