Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

April 29, 2010 -

I think most would agree that clubbing a seal to death for its pelt is a pretty abhorrent, violent act. But is a comedic iPhone app that lets you commit that act equally untoward? Opinions will differ on that topic, for sure, but Apple's official position on the subject seems to be that is very naughty indeed. According to iPhone app developer Matt Smyth, his iPhone iSealClub app has been rejected by Apple because it contains "objectionable content." Smyth was informed of the decision on Tuesday in an email from Apple (check out this YouTube video to get a glimpse of the game in action).

Matt Smyth can't understand why Apple rejected iSealClub:

"They allow other apps, like Trophy Hunt for bear and deer and whatnot. I don't see the difference between killing a seal and killing a deer," he said in an interview Wednesday.

A fair point. In iSealClub players use a cartoon club to hunt cartoon seals, but there are limits that make the game a little more tasteful. The game doesn't contain any blood and baby seals are off limits. Smyth, a Newfoundland resident, feels iSealClub was rejected because the company is against seal hunting, which is "socially acceptable" in his province and sanctioned by the Canadian government.

Meanwhile PETA was delighted with the decision. Commenting on the official PETA Blog, Jennifer O'Connor had nothing but love for Apple CEO Steve Jobs - even though Apple previously rejected one of its apps:

Sure, Apple banned our Be Nice to Bunnies app after catching a glimpse of sexy Stephanie Pratt in the buff, but PETA doesn't hold it against Steve Jobs. In fact, we think that Jobs and the rest of the Apple crew are pretty great after learning that the App Store said "no way" to an app called iSealClub—a game in which users wield a metal-tipped club and earn points by bashing seals to death.

O'Connor went on to say that PETA would be sending Jobs a "thank-you note along with some yummy vegan chocolate seals" as a token of appreciation.

Maybe i'm wrong, but vegan chocolate seals sound like more a punishment than a reward.

Posted in

Comments

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Apple sucks, we all know this.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Dammit, how that Apple won't let me get my fix, I'm gonna have to go up north and club some real seals. And send the pics to PETA for good measure.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Oh PETA you and your attempts to be relevant.

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

"I think most would agree that clubbing a seal to death for its pelt is a pretty abhorrent, violent act."

I think you're right. I certainly would. I would also agree that de-clawing lions and forcing them to fight packs of heyenas while people spectate and wager on the outcome is equally barbaric. Fortunately both are fictitious scenarios, despite what PETA has to say about it the former, and yet somehow people simply believe the lie without any effort to actually investigate the reality of the scenario.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

"I think most would agree that clubbing a seal to death for its pelt is a pretty abhorrent, violent act."  Indeed they would, because PETA's managed to brainwash everyone into believing that the "clubbing" is done with roughly the same precision as a blindfolded childing swinging at a piñata.  In fact, almost all of the hunting is done with firearms, usually killing the seal instantaneously.  The clubs (actually hakapiks, which have metal hooks for moving the carcass afterwards) are only swung in case of incapacitation, and are used for their efficiency: it takes just one swing to collapse the skull.  It's the most efficient method possible.

But PETA needs a cute mascot to haul people into its clutches, so the perfectly humane seal hunt gets all this negative press, while foie gras still gets a pass because geese are ugly-ass dudes.

---
Fangamer

---
Fangamer

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.

 

Wait.

 

Are you really trying to argue logic with PETA?

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

PETA seems to be under the mistaken impression that the world is just vying for their approval... like a dead-beat dad.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

So let me get this straight - they ban the app of a company that's protesting the slaughter of baby seals, because the app portrays 'objectionable content'? Isn't the fact that clubbing baby seals to death is objectionable kind of the point?

And PETA is siding with Apple and against the company that wants to protect baby seals?

Am I missing something here? When did PETA join the pro-hunting lobby? What's next - will they be sending tofu and kashi to the NRA?

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Nah, I bet PETA would rather see a game where domesticated cats and dogs are clubbed to death instead of..y'know..actually finding homes for them.

 - W

Consumer responsibility is just as important as Corporate responsibility. So, be responsible consumers.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Wait, wait.

So... they applaud the censoring of a game that they feel would invoke people to club seals, and then offer vegan chocolate seal treats as a reward?

You want to know what happens if you give ANYBODY animal crackers? They bite off the fucking HEAD. And the limbs. And that's just fine with me- if I can't bash seals on my iPud, then I'll bite off animal cookie heads and pretend that I'm beheading them for the exact same fucking effect.

And nothing will have changed. No seals will be saved, and no crackers will be spared.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

I wonder if anybody at Apple even still remembers their 1984 ad.  If so, do they see the irony in the way they (try to) exert absolute control over what is done with their devices?

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

How about IClubPETA members? that sounds like it could be fun.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

I'm surprised PETA never found Bloody Penguin Baseball. Essentially the same thing.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Apparently, some animals got better PR agents than other animals.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

The irony in this is that not 20 minutes ago I was updating my Kitten Cannon app...

And, I mean, hey, if I wanted to re-enact a violent game like the media thinks we all do, it's a lot easier to get my hands on a cat that a seal. I suppose the cannon is a different story, but I think I made my point.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Just watch Star Trek TOS episode "The Arena."  Cannon issue = solved.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

What do they do exactly to make a chocolate seal vegan?

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

They either:

A: Send them cacao beans ground up and shaped like a seal.

B: Use the tofu equivalent of chocolate, which is really just something awful-tasting that somehow got mislabeled "Chocolate".

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Or, I dunno, use soya milk instead of animal milk? I mean, it's not a very farfetch thing...

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

 It is if you value your sense of taste.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Also, plants can't fight back.  Animals can.  So eating plants, that can never defend themselves (barring poison, but there's ways around that), attack you, or call for help, is one of the most immoral things you can do.  </PETA logic applied to plants>

 

"That's not ironic. That's justice."

"That's not ironic. That's justice."

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Anything that makes PETA applaud, is utterly evil and wrong. Apple should be ashamed. I´m also agree that this is complete censoring of speech.

 

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

"Anything that makes PETA applaud, is utterly evil and wrong"

Peta is utterly evil and wrong but that's not true of all of their positions. For example do you think what Micheal Vick did was wrong? Well so did Peta.

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

And as a private entity apple has every right to censor speech if they want.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

I know, I know. But no baby seal will be saved because they just banned a naughty game.

If I had a private company and hear about PETA backing my actions, then I would be like: "screw this, put that seal killing simulator back again, and this time put blood on it".

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Actually, every baby seal is saved.  It's illegal to hunt a seal until it's fully grown.

---
Fangamer

---
Fangamer

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Not for being illegal that doesn´t mean that nobody is not gonna kill a baby seal.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Double negatives aside, no economical hunter would kill a baby seal. Their pelts are really crappy, they're barely worth skinning, and it's only profitable to wait for the seal to reach the age where its fur looks nice.

 

This is a signature virus. Please copy and paste into your signature to help it propagate.

This is a signature virus. Please copy and paste into your signature to help it propagate.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Agreed. As a rule of thumb, PETA's approval should fill one with shame.

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

Once again Apple is censoring what can be considered politcal speech.

The whole App store approval process is a huge joke.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

I agree with you. Its there censoring and unblanance approval process the reasons why I do not have an Iphone

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Apple Rejects iClubSeal App, PETA Applauds

"But is a comedic iPhone app that lets you commit that act equally untoward?"

No.  Glad we could clear that up.

 

Andrew Eisen

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
NeenekoI have met some real jerks and slimeballs in gender activism, but when I hear the idea that there are many 'not nice' people it comes across as code for 'uppity people who do not know their place'.09/19/2014 - 12:10pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Many of the people pushing gender issues aren't nice people? I'm sure not everyone's a sweatheart but so far, everyone I've seen with such a critique had absolutely nothing to back them up.09/19/2014 - 10:46am
InfophileI think there's a qualitative difference between a site and a hashtag though. GP can ban anyone from commenting, so they can have the image they want. But anyone can use any hashtag and try to poison it. Granted, that hasn't happened to the other one yet09/19/2014 - 10:13am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, your comparison to GP does not work. We do not need to get rid of GP, because no one associates GP with trolls and abuse. The same can't be said for gamergate.09/19/2014 - 10:09am
Krono@Michael You don't remember the "other hashtag" because no one actually uses it. We're talking 836,983 uses of #gamergate over it's lifetime, and 8,119 for the "alternative". 47,129 uses on the 18th vs 41. With #notyourshield at 140,133 uses & 5,209 uses09/19/2014 - 9:48am
Kronoresearch it. Changing tags to get away from trolls would be like wiping GamePolitics and restarting under a new name to get away from people calling Jack Thompson a filthy names in the comments section.09/19/2014 - 9:35am
Sleaker@quiknkold - seems like all that page is is a bunch of random developer opinions and rumors that we're supposedto do what with?09/19/2014 - 9:31am
Kronoas an opportunity to push back against them. It's one of the things muddling the issue. @conster A new hashtag would do nothing to improve anything. Trolls will simply follow to the new hashtag, and it will confuse the issue for anyone attempting to09/19/2014 - 9:25am
Krono@Andrew aaah. Yes, I'm sure there's some of that. Part of the problem is many of the people pushing gender issues are not very nice people. Basically the latest incarnation of moralists we've seen in the past couple decades. Naturually some will take this09/19/2014 - 9:23am
quiknkoldhttp://www.nichegamer.net/2014/09/real-gamedevs-sound-off-regarding-the-gamergate-controversy/09/19/2014 - 8:35am
MaskedPixelanteMeanwhile, in news that actually DOES matter, Scotland voted "NO" to Scottish independance.09/19/2014 - 8:20am
ConsterSeriously? "We shouldn't make a new hashtag - it's better to associate ourselves with psychos than to decrease our visibility"?09/19/2014 - 7:54am
Michael ChandraI forget what it is exactly, but there already is another hashtag that some use, exactly to separate themselves from the abusive behaviour. So don't bother lying to me.09/19/2014 - 7:06am
quiknkold2 to 3 or more09/19/2014 - 6:53am
quiknkoldMichael Chandra : I'll say this. The only reason they havent used another hashtag is because it would look like a form of dividing the arguement. Using another Hashtag has come up, and they feel like if they made a new hashtag, it'll split the debate from09/19/2014 - 6:53am
Michael ChandraYou want a debate? Build a wall between you and the poisoned well. Make clear you despise it, despise the behaviour. Then get into the other issues you are troubled with, and don't say a single word again about the poisoned well.09/19/2014 - 3:46am
Michael ChandraAnd someone claiming #notyourshield was to be taken serious, when chatlogs show they wanted it going to hide even more harassment behind? Yeah, not buying a word you're saying. You poisoned your own well.09/19/2014 - 3:45am
Michael Chandraallegedly fired over giving a game a mediocre review and the company threatened to pull ads? Sorry but I ain't buying this.09/19/2014 - 3:45am
Michael ChandraBut people arguing this is horrible and just about ethics, even though there's very little support that journalistic integrity was actually violated here, while they never spoke up when a journalist was09/19/2014 - 3:43am
Michael ChandraIf people start with condemning the way GamersGate was used as a misdirection, then use a better hashtag, that would work in convincing me they mean it.09/19/2014 - 3:43am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician