AU Pol Ticked Over Gambling Games

May 3, 2010 -

A South Australian politician fears that downloadable gambling games might fall into the hands of children.

Senator Nick Xenophon (pictured) is taking aim at Australian-based Pokie Magic, which creates mobile and PC games based on slot machines (or pokies). Xenophon, according to AdelaideNow, stated, “If they are an Australian corporation, then we can legislate to stop this.”

“Children will play these applications thinking they cannot lose when in reality you cannot win,” said the Senator, continuing, “We need an overhaul of our laws because the technological world has moved so quickly our laws are out of date and we need a national approach to this.”

Pokie Magic does state on its site that its games “should only be downloaded and played if you are aged 18 or over.” In the iTunes store, however, at least the U.S. version, Pokie Magic’s games are rated 12+ for “frequent/intense simulated gambling.” GamePron looked in the AU version of the iTunes Store and “came up empty-handed.”

A Queensland Office of Liquor and Gaming Regulations spokesperson told the paper, “As with any technology the best form of regulation for children is parental supervision,” adding, “… parents are encouraged to be vigilant with their children's access to mobile phone applications.”

Xenophon has been fighting against gambling, and specifically “pokies,” since his involvement in politics began some 13 years ago.


|Via GamePron|


Comments

Re: AU Pol Ticked Over Gambling Games

I remember when the older Pokemon games had Poke machines where you were able to gamble your PKMN coins.

:D

Funny isn't it, how somehow many politicians forget that there are ALLOT of card games and casino type of games in computer games ever since the Super Nintendo days and yet politicians make idiots of themselves getting afraid of gambling addiction when in reality gambling affects many older generation people and most of them have never grown up with computer games.

 

TBoneTony

Re: AU Pol Ticked Over Gambling Games

An interesting point that, I wonder if there has been any studies to see how many problem gamblers are also regular gamers. Go into any bar in Australia that has pokies and you will find legions 60+ year old people throwing away their weekly pension into those machines.

Re: AU Pol Ticked Over Gambling Games

You know, I could go to just about any backwoods gas station on an interstate and buy a LCD-display poker game for $10. 10 friggin' bucks for unlimited, unrestricted fake-gambling.

And I'd get BORED.

 

Children will play these applications thinking they cannot lose when in reality you cannot win.

You're NOT playing Texas Hold-Em, moron!
Your kid isn't going to gamble his dead grandmother's antique vase in a FAKE poker game.

Re: AU Pol Ticked Over Gambling Games

So this game is just a simulation of gambling yet this idiots got his knickers in a twist? What a twit.

Re: AU Pol Ticked Over Gambling Games

He does make an interesting point though as this was an major issue with Australia's video game classification system last year beyond the need for an r18+ rating. Basically the board can only classify a game if the actual game is being sold in a store which meant download only and even a few MMO's (World of Warcraft) were able to bypass Australia's classification system because of this loophole. It wasn't until last year when this issue hit the media and politicians became aware of it that WoW actually got a rating on it despite it being available at any store that sells games since it's release.

This guy is also pretty anti-game being opposed to an R18+ rating and even tried to get a tamagotchi game banned in Australia (or at least rated R18+) because it had a slot game in it. Not surprisingly the issue was quickly dropped when he found out Australia didn't have an R18+ rating for computer games lest he appear in support of it.

Re: AU Pol Ticked Over Gambling Games

Well gee, having a ratings category for 18 and over would help now wouldn't it?

Re: AU Pol Ticked Over Gambling Games

Since they're delivered through the mobile platform delivery systems (iTunes etc) I don't think an R rating would actually help at all there.

I've never seen their games in any stores, though honestly I've never looked for them either.

Looking at their website, purchased products are available to download, and I think their 'all games on one disk' is express posted. Again not sure where the ratings would even come into it. Perhaps because it's not sold in a store it doesn't have to even be submitted to the OFLC and can avoid the possibility of rejection.

 

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
Matthew WilsonSF have to build upwards they have natural growth limits. they can not grow outwards. ps growing outwards is terable just look at Orlando or Austin for that.04/16/2014 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeIf they built upward then it would becoem like every other place making it worthless, if they don't build upward they will price people out making it worthless, what they need to do is a mix of things not just one exstreme or another.04/16/2014 - 4:00pm
Matthew Wilsonyou know the problem in SF was not the free market going wrong right? it was government distortion. by not allowing tall buildings to be build they limited supply. that is not free market.04/16/2014 - 3:48pm
ZippyDSMleeOh gaaa the free market is a lie as its currently leading them to no one living there becuse they can not afford it makign it worthless.04/16/2014 - 3:24pm
Matthew WilsonIf you have not read http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/introducing-steam-gauge-ars-reveals-steams-most-popular-games/ you should. It is a bit stats heavy, but worth the read.04/16/2014 - 2:04pm
Matthew Wilsonthe issue is when is doesn't work it can screw over millions in new york city's case. more often than not it is better to let the free market run its course without market distortion.04/16/2014 - 9:36am
NeenekoTrue, and overdone stagnation is a problem. It is a tricky balance. It does not help that when it does work, no one notices. Most people here have benifited from rent controls and not even realized it.04/16/2014 - 9:23am
ZippyDSMleehttp://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2014/04/15/riaa_files_civil_suit_against_megaupload04/16/2014 - 8:48am
ZippyDSMleeEither way you get stagnation as people can not afford the prices they set.04/16/2014 - 8:47am
Neenekowell, specifically it helps people already living there and hurts people who want to live there instead. As for 'way more hurt', majorities generally need less legal protection. yes it hurt more people then it helped, it was written for a minority04/16/2014 - 8:30am
MaskedPixelantehttp://torrentfreak.com/square-enix-drm-boosts-profits-and-its-here-to-stay-140415/ Square proves how incredibly out of touch they are by saying that DRM is the way of the future, and is here to stay.04/16/2014 - 8:29am
james_fudgeUnwinnable Weekly Telethon playing Metal Gear http://www.twitch.tv/rainydayletsplay04/16/2014 - 8:06am
ConsterTo be fair, there's so little left of the middle class that those numbers are skewing.04/16/2014 - 7:42am
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician