Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

May 3, 2010 -

The Los Angeles Times recently peppered State Senator Leland Yee with a few questions about the original legislation he penned making it all the way to the United States Supreme Court.

Perhaps the best question posed to Yee asked how he could introduce legislation that would make it illegal to sell violent games to minors when he is not very familiar with games at all.

Yee answered:

That is a fair criticism. I'm not a player. But I have seen individuals who play these games. I have seen individuals using a baseball bat and bludgeoning a hooker to death, or taking a gun and shooting a cop. Those are the direct result of someone pushing a button and making a conscious decision. I can see that that kind of connection between your action and the consequent behavior is dangerous.

With a movie you can sit there for two hours and see everything. In these violent games, parents may never fully understand what they contain because you have to be a very sophisticated player to trigger them.

Yee was then asked "Do you think video games are an art form? Do game creators deserve freedom of expression?"

He answered:

This is where some critics misunderstand me. I think video games are artful and it takes a lot of creativity to make them. I also think the interactive nature of them and the technology behind them can have great educational value.

I'm never going to be the person who stands up and says we should ban these ultra-violent video games. I'm just saying children ought not to be allowed to access them unless a parent buys it for them. Otherwise, video games are just as worthy under the 1st Amendment as movies.

Comments

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

I called BS on whatever Yee said.  This prick is lying.

 


 

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

I'm just saying children ought not to be allowed to access them unless a parent buys it for them.

That's already the way it is moron.
 

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

He's no more "misguided" as Jack Thompson or that prick David Grossman, he knows EXACTLY what he's doing in twisting things to further an agenda. He's been at this for years now, his seat on the misguided ignorance train left the station back in 2007.

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

If he acknowledges its under the first amendment than he shouldn't be doing this. Im not fooled when he says its parents decision. This guy is a straight out liar. He is insulting with those comments as if we are stupid not to see through his twisted ways.

Second, the idea that video games can encourage more than movies is completely false. Someone is more likely to be inspired to do something from a movie. This is just wasting tax money.

XBL/PSN Keegs79

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

As the above poster said "YOU LIE!"

This "law" is nothing more than an attempt to chill free speech. The First Amendment, 60 years of Supreme Court precedent, and the industry's success in voluntary enforcement goes against Yee's idiocy.

It will be fun to see Yee weeping into the streets of Sacramento after SCOTUS rejects California's law as unconstitutional.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Hornets, Jack Thompson can geaux chase a chupacabra. Hell will stay frozen over for quite a while since the Saints won the Super Bowl.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Pelicans. Solidarity for the Saints = No retreat, no surrender. 2013 = Saints' revenge on the NFL. Even through the darkest days, this fire burns always.

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

As I said o nthe first post, he does want an outright ban, he's just trying to skirt the law to do it.

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

"YOU LIE!"

Seriously, does Yee or any of these politicians actually understand what the First Amendment and Free Speech are about?  Also, for a guy who supposedly respects gamers and game creators, he sure has a lot of asshole remarks, lies, and outright hyperbole vilifying the medium and the people who make/play them. 

At least trash like Jack Thompson, Mr Atkinson, and Keith Vaz don't lie about their stance on this subject.  Leland Yee is a two-faced lying serpent.

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

So once again a censor is using ignorance as evidence, and seems to think this justifiies their position. It's funny, I've never been in politics, but I just know that every single politician out there is a lying, self-serving control freak with the morals of an alleycat who hang out in mens toilets looking at wangs.

This is, of course, not true, but sauce for the goose...

Problem is by tagetting the few, you are affecting the freedom of the many, that's why he has to kid himself on the 'overwhelming' evidence, it's the only way he can end-run the constitution.

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

Just goes to show that not only does he know nothing about videogames, but that apparently he can't make the distinction between reality and fiction. Making the decision to "harm" something that isn't real is NOT the same thing as doing so to something that is real. Pressing a button is NOT the same as firing a real weapon in any way, nor will it teach you to do so or provide access to them.

The simple fact is that anyone who would murder is inherintly unstable to begin with, and that we have to debate this at all is astonishing. Do videogames turn people into killers? NO! END OF DISCUSSION!

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

I understand it now.  Yee speaks of individuals that play video games as though they are actually committing crimes such as assault and battery, solicitation of prostitution, and murder.  This means that Leland Yee is unable to distinguish between fantasy and reality, and as such, should not be allowed to be near anyone, for any stimulus of any kind could maybe trigger a reaction.  He might or might not commit a violent act that may or may not harm people, so to be on the safe side, let's lock him up and keep him sedated.

It's not that I disagree with his stance or anything, I'm just trying to look out for the public's best interest.

 

"That's not ironic. That's justice."

"That's not ironic. That's justice."

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

Making a "conscious decision" to "harm" something that you know is only a bunch of 1's and 0's and a physics engine is not the same as becoming a cold-blooded murderer. Who would even think that?

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

the intent may be coming from the right place, but the action is a bit misguided.

honestly, i think Yee is a rational man who is just dealing with something new without also trying to come up with a new method for dealing with it.

 

Here are we -- and yonder yawns the universe.

Here are we -- and yonder yawns the universe.

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

Assuming he isn't full of crap with his last statement, I have no problem with his idea.  I however, do hold issue with what this legislation may make others try to push for.  They may attempt to take that last step and try to ban them for everyone.  I mainly am concerned for what others will try to twist off of this law if it is passed, not with the reasoning behind the law itself (though I don't know how it is meant to be executed).  But I understand and sympathize with his position, and I do believe it is the parents' responsibility to determine what their children are mature enough to play, or what they are willing to let their children play.

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt." ~Best quote ever, Albert Einstein

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt." ~Best quote ever, Albert Einstein

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

"I can see that that kind of connection between your action and the consequent behavior is dangerous."

So pressing buttons to make virtual people do stuff is dangerous?

Does he even know what he's saying?

----------------------------------------------------

Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

Somehow Yee seems to mistake pressing a button in a game with pressing a button that launches a neuclear missile...

I have launched many neuclear missiles in Missile Command back on the Atari 2600, but so far the world is just fine because the only neuclear bomb that has ever been used was used at the end of WW2 long before videogames have ever been invented.

 

TBoneTony

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

2 Bombs, not one, and those were the one used against a living population. A lot more were detonated.

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

........... spin spin spin............ its real simple dear when you treat a book, a video a comic and a video game the same thats when I will take 5 minutes to listen to you before I take 50 and tell you how wrong you re with a good old wall of text!


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

"That is a fair criticism. I'm not a player. But I have seen individuals who play these games. I have seen individuals using a baseball bat and bludgeoning a hooker to death, or taking a gun and shooting a cop. Those are the direct result of someone pushing a button and making a conscious decision. I can see that that kind of connection between your action and the consequent behavior is dangerous."
 

That's right ladies and gentlemen. Pressing a button is somehow accurately simulates the activity it activates. Yes, it's a consious decision, as is all good ones that have ever done in a game. A concious decision in a game is not the same as that in real life. The consequences are entirely different, and any mind (except for those off their nut) can grasp such a concept. If anything, the only thing that the violence can really do is the same as can be done for a movie. And last I checked, movies aren't regulated by the government.

"With a movie you can sit there for two hours and see everything. In these violent games, parents may never fully understand what they contain because you have to be a very sophisticated player to trigger them."

Pressing a button to shoot a gun. Aiming the camera towards civilian. Press button to shoot gun at said civilian. How sophisticated. Seriously, there is nothing so sophisticated in games that would result in parents being unlikely to find out if they actually put effort into watching what their kids play.

"I'm never going to be the person who stands up and says we should ban these ultra-violent video games. I'm just saying children ought not to be allowed to access them unless a parent buys it for them. Otherwise, video games are just as worthy under the 1st Amendment as movies."

In that case, because the current ESRB system works wonderfully when combined with the strict policies of stores, there should be no issue. Why do you have an issue?

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." -Albert Einstein

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." -Albert Einstein

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

Dan

"Pressing a button to shoot a gun. Aiming the camera towards civilian. Press button to shoot gun at said civilian. How sophisticated. Seriously, there is nothing so sophisticated in games that would result in parents being unlikely to find out if they actually put effort into watching what their kids play."

True. If they watch the whole thing. The point he is making is that you can't see the worrisome content unless you play through a substantial portion of some games, if you have the expertise to trigger the storyline at all, as in story games like Mass Effect.

But as a parent, I do believe the game industry does a proper job in it's safeguards without government intervention.

 

 

Dan

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

"I have seen individuals using a baseball bat and bludgeoning a hooker to death, or taking a gun and shooting a cop. Those are the direct result of someone pushing a button and making a conscious decision."

Because these things never happened before pong.

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

This is like a Not Joke. "I am not seeking a ban on Ultra-Violent games.....NOT"

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

And isn't this the way it is today? Games such as GTA IV, Manhunt, Call of Duty, DA: Origins and other Mature rated games can only be sold to minors unless a parent by these games for them? Not because of a state or federal law, but mainly because the shops requires this...

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

Indeed. The industry does indeed police itself just fine, with the help of parents who pay attention.

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

"I'm just saying children ought not to be allowed to access them unless a parent buys it for them."

Why not?  Do you have a good reason?  No?  Then it's not your call for anyone but your own children.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Yee: I Would Never Seek a Ban of Ultra-Violent Games

Pardon my language but Yee as usual is full of horseshit.

He is seeking a ban, he's just looking to do it through the chilling effect than an outright ban.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you feel about Amazon buying Twitch?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelantehttp://m.tickld.com/x/something-you-never-realized-about-guardians-of-the-galaxy Right in the feels.08/29/2014 - 6:56pm
AvalongodAgain I think we're conflating the issue of whether Sarkeesian's claims are beyond critique (no they're not) and whether its ever appropriate to use sexist language, let alone physical threats on a woman to intimidate her (no it isn't)08/29/2014 - 5:04pm
prh99Trolling her or trying to assail her integrity just draws more attention (Streisand effect?). Which is really not what the trolls want, so the only way to win (if there is a win to be had) is not to play/troll.08/29/2014 - 5:02pm
prh99Who cares, just don't watch the damn videos if you don't like her. Personally, I don't care as far as she is concerned as long there are interesting games to be played.08/29/2014 - 4:34pm
Andrew EisenZip - And yet, you can't cite a single, solitary example. (And no one said you hated anyone. Along those lines, no one claimed Sarkeesian was perfect either.)08/29/2014 - 3:51pm
Andrew EisenSaint's Row: Gat Out of Hell was just announced for PC, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360 and Xbox One making it the 150th game For Everything But Wii U! Congratulations Deep Silver!08/29/2014 - 3:49pm
ZippyDSMleeI do not hate them jsut think its mostly hyperlobe.08/29/2014 - 3:40pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - I'd say that's likely. From my experience, most who have a problem with Sarkeesian's videos either want to hate them in the first place (for whatever reason) or honestly misunderstand what they're about and what they're saying.08/29/2014 - 3:16pm
james_fudgeWe appreciate your support :)08/29/2014 - 2:55pm
TechnogeekIt gives me hope that maybe, just maybe, the gaming community is not statistically indistinguishable from consisting entirely of people that your average Xbox Live caricature would look at and go "maybe you should tone it down a little bit".08/29/2014 - 2:49pm
TechnogeekI just want to say that while I've disagreed with the staff of this site on several occasions, it's still good to see that they're not automatically dismissing Anita's videos as a "misandrist scam" or whatever the preferred dismissive term is these days.08/29/2014 - 2:49pm
E. Zachary KnightZippy, So you can't find even one?08/29/2014 - 1:04pm
ZippyDSMleeAndrew Eisen:Right because shes prefect and never exaggerates... *rolls eyes*08/29/2014 - 12:53pm
SleakerAnd honestly, nearly all of the games she references, or images she depicts I've always cringed at and wondered why they were included in games to begin with, from pinups through explicit sexual depictions or direct abuse. I think it's cheap storytelling.08/29/2014 - 12:35pm
Sleaker@AE - aren't most people fundamentally misunderstanding her at this point? haha.. On a related note I think a lot of the backlash is coming from males that think she is telling them their 'Generic Male Fantasy' is bad and wrong.08/29/2014 - 12:33pm
Andrew EisenAnd no, I don't think the female community would be upset over the performance of a case study in and of itself. Possibly the mostivations behind such a study, the methodology or conclusions but not the mere idea of a case study.08/29/2014 - 12:29pm
Andrew EisenAmusingly, these videos aren't saying you can't/shouldn't use tropes or that sexual representations are inherently problematic so those are very silly things to have a problem with and indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of the series.08/29/2014 - 12:29pm
SleakerDo you think the female community would get extremely angry over a male doing a case study on the negative impact of sex-novels and their unrealistic depiction of males and how widespread they are in american culture?08/29/2014 - 12:25pm
SleakerThe other thing that people might find problematic is that they see no problem with sexual representations of females (or males) in games. And realistically, why is there anything wrong with sexual representations in fiction?08/29/2014 - 12:24pm
SleakerTo even discuss or bring up these issues at a cultural level to begin with. Going straight for games to many probably feels like a huge overstepping given that it's interactive story in many cases, and when you're telling a story why can't you use tropes.08/29/2014 - 12:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician