Game Community Response May Have Slowed Pro-R18+ Movement

May 11, 2010 -

The strong response from Australia’s gaming community to the R18+ issue may have backfired a bit, as the government is now delaying discussion of the issue in order to get feedback from more of the community.

GameSpot notes that Minister for Home Affairs Brendan O’Connor indicated that, “…further work needs to be done before a decision can be made.” When pressed, O’Connor told the publication that “ministers had agreed that a broader consultation of the public's views was needed following the dominant response from ‘interest groups.’”

While a spokesperson from O’Connor’s office indicated that “interest groups” referenced the 34 community, church, and other groups that lodged submissions in the public consultation, GameSpot wrote that, “given that submissions were dominated by pro-R18+ interest groups (EB Games and Grow Up Australia), the intended meaning seems clear.”

Perhaps the AU government doesn’t understand that gamers now permeate just about every corner of culture, a point made by Interactive Games and Entertainment Association (iGEA) President Ron Curry, who stated, “I’m not sure how the [Home Affairs] minister pigeon-holes them as an 'interest group', because gamers cover all facets of society.”

Curry, who also noted that a recent poll indicated that 68% of Australians are gamers, continued:

If consultations, by their nature, attract submissions from people who are passionate about an issue--and I assume passionate in both opposition and support--then why bother?


Thanks Ryan!


Comments

Re: Game Community Response May Have Slowed Pro-R18+ ...

Maybe now the AU government will come to it's senses on this issue and let it rest. It has taken them a really extremely long time to know that 68% of Australian's are gamers. Hmmmm.....the government there is far behind and needs to catch up with times.

 

 

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

"It's better to be hated for who you are, then be loved for who you are not." - Montgomery Gentry

Re: Game Community Response May Have Slowed Pro-R18+ ...

I would perhaps not listen to anything that the Minister of Home Affairs is saying at the moment. (HE is not an Attorney General anyway, so who cares of what he is saying)

From what I understand, is that the Attorney Generals are still making their mind up on the issue weighing up all options that they could do, perhaps trying to get more informed decisions or something like that.

Well done Australian gamers for doing their part, we have got nothing to be dissapointed it.

The only thing that we only have to be dissapointed in is that there are not many gamers in politics who can speak more to the Australian media and get more support from people who either don't know about the issue or either don't care about us...

Lets just make sure that the next Attorney Generals after the state and federal elections in other parts of Australia are more even minded and can made decisions early just so we don't have to wait as long, or else this would prove that politicians know nothing about computer games, therefore they are not suitable to make decisions.

I'd like to say that we need a change in the classification system, allow the classification board to make their own decisions on what they want to do and not have them bined by the government's decisions on whether to include an R18+ rating for computer games...

 

anyway, we as Aussie gamers have got nothing to be dissapointed about, we did our best and that is all we could do, and a 98% positive vote out of over 60,000 submissions to the government is perhaps the strongest indicator that we do need an R18+ rating for computer games, even if most of society does not care about us, we have proven that there are allot of people who do care and that is all we can do.

TBoneTony

Re: Game Community Response May Have Slowed Pro-R18+ ...

Yeah, this smells of something. Government would be hilariously amusing if it couldn't at the same time be so dangerous.

Re: Game Community Response May Have Slowed Pro-R18+ ...

This is just a delay in the process. It's Federal Election year. My guess is that the Government doesn't want to rock the boat with the Christian/Lunatic Fringe.

One of the things you need to realise is that most of the popular media is traditionally heavily conservative (not unlike FOX) and Labour governments are always facing criticism from that front. If it doesn't make the news then they're nothing to report on and nothing for the media to blow out of all proportion.

With the amount of support behind change, the change will happen .... it will just happen AFTER the election.

Re: Game Community Response May Have Slowed Pro-R18+ ...

So their plan is to get people who are not interested in the R18 debate to make commetns on it? Seriously? They had this request for comment open for months. You would think that those that were interested in voicing their opinion on the subject would have done so.What do they plan to do differently this time? How will they attract comments from those that do not care about the issue? E. Zachary Knight Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Game Community Response May Have Slowed Pro-R18+ ...

I think many of the traditional power blocks were fairly quiet due to the 'of course it would be' attitude that took the status-quo as a given.  They had no idea anyone would challenge it in any real amount.

Re: Game Community Response May Have Slowed Pro-R18+ ...

I have to agree witn  Neeneko.  Had the government gotten a disproportional number of responses from "activist" groups against R18+, would they have delayed their response to solicit more responses from pro R18+ groups?

Re: Game Community Response May Have Slowed Pro-R18+ ...

 I doubt this is a delay caused by the Pro-R18+ movement.

Generally governments are fine with one sided lobbying from specific interest groups, so that is not the issue.   More likely they were getting concerned about lobbying from a non-established group for something that was a forgone conclusion  from their traditional sources.   So now they have to find a way to counter this new lobby without pissing off older ones, thus they are making double sure that the older ones have a disproportionally loud voice at the table.

So it is less of a delay of something already in motion (that would have gone forward without Pro-R18+ groups) and more of a 'oh shit, things are moving without an established power! quick! how can we make sure our friends stay powerful while giving the illusion of fairness?'

Re: Game Community Response May Have Slowed Pro-R18+ ...

If it means there are more comprehensive arguments in place, on both sides of the fence, then surely that can only be a good thing in the long term.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
Matthew WilsonSF have to build upwards they have natural growth limits. they can not grow outwards. ps growing outwards is terable just look at Orlando or Austin for that.04/16/2014 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeIf they built upward then it would becoem like every other place making it worthless, if they don't build upward they will price people out making it worthless, what they need to do is a mix of things not just one exstreme or another.04/16/2014 - 4:00pm
Matthew Wilsonyou know the problem in SF was not the free market going wrong right? it was government distortion. by not allowing tall buildings to be build they limited supply. that is not free market.04/16/2014 - 3:48pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician