U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

May 13, 2010 -

The United States Air Force bought 336 PlayStation 3 consoles in 2009 as an initial purchase to create a 53 teraFlop cluster for processing data. Impressed with the power of Sony's home console system, the Air Force decided to buy another 2200 consoles. The whole project cost the Air Force (and by proxy the U.S. tax payers) $663,000.

These PS3 systems were configured with the "Other OS" feature, allowing the Air Force to use Linux to do whatever heavy lifting the project needed, but Sony's recent firmware update that removed that option may prove to be problematic for this work in the future.

"We will have to continue to use the systems we already have in hand," said an Air Force rep speaking with Ars Technica. "This will make it difficult to replace systems that break or fail. The refurbished PS3s also have the problem that when they come back from Sony, they have the firmware (gameOS) and it will not allow Other OS, which seems wrong. We are aware of class-action lawsuits against Sony for taking away this option on systems that used to have it."

While the Air Force made no further comment on the Class Action Lawsuit, it would probably fair to say that it hopes Sony will not prevail and it won't have to worry about the infamous firmware update removing the features it needs to continue its work..

Source: Ars Technica


Comments

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

"Oh man, sorry about your car, Kaz.  If only our smart bombs had had just a few more brain Cells to rub together, they wouldn't have been so far off target..."

 

;)

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

Um.... yeah I would bet that the Air Force falls under a whole different sales department, a sales department that will make sure the systems that are sold to the Air Force will work for the Air Force.  Typical company sales structure, not sure why everyone is like "oh noes the air force!"

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

There was no contract, they just bought them.

using PS3s was immensely cheaper than building computers from any of the contracted sources.  those guys saved the taxpayers something to the tune of $1-2 Million.

Here are we -- and yonder yawns the universe.

Here are we -- and yonder yawns the universe.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

On one hand its sucks that replacing the ps3 will be difficult if one of them broke down since the other os feature was remove. On the other hand the Air Force should have used real supercomputers and not gaming consoles.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

Note: The cell processor, was developed for the Army, for the Roadrunner machine (impressive machine, actually).

Sony, just "jumped in" and helped develop it even further.

The Air Force, decided to design their own super-computer using PS3, like NASA do (NASA buy off-the-shelf computers and make clusters too, some people claim that the "Beowulf" cluster is NASA invention, to the point that I saw many people calling it "NASA-style" cluster). Clusters, are a cheap way to make supercomputer, they are the same, PS3 actually, work better as cluster cell, than as gaming console (because its low, but extremely fast ram for example...)

 

So, a supercomputer built with PS3, IS a real computer, it is not a toy, not a bunch of gaming consoles. And it is easier to program than Roadrunner too... (Roadrunner is hell fast, but it is annoying to use, because it mixes Cell processors with Xeon, and they have diffrent architecture and way to work, and need to interact to reach full calculation speed... Roadrunner is like a gigantic Sega Saturn...)

 

 

Actually, it is Sony that should have made a real console, instead of a supercomputer part that is hell expensive... (altough, I DO like PS3... I am dieing to get my hands in one... And do all sorts of experiments and gaming on it...)

 

criadordejogos.wordpress.com

--- Maurício Gomes twitter.com/agfgames

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

These things are also popular for Clustering algorithms for dna sequences.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

They were likely trying to save some money.

 

If a fairly inexpensive device can do what a more expensive device can do, most would go or the less expensive device.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

That's exactly what they were doing.  IIRC, they stated that it would require a $2000 investment per computer to get a system built for them that can do what they need, as compared to a $600 per-unit PS3, which already had the ability, with the Other OS function.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

Hehe, and Sony said no one uses that feature?

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

I think Sony was refering to ther general public not private and goverment agencies. we Over here we have a cluster of 30 PS3s here on College. I'm sure the Air Force can get PS3s with that feature straight from Sony.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

No, no, no.  The Air Force already has those PS3's, and the firmware update removed the vital (for them) Other OS function, making their purchase of over $600,000 a complete waste, since they can no longer do what they needed them to do.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

I don't think that's what's being said jedi.  It reads like, "We have the PS3s and will continue to use them, but when we need to replace any, we're screwed."  I'd suspect they can get Sony to sell them PS3s with the old firmware though.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

I'd LOVE to get a look at tha purchase contract Sony signed with the Air Force. At the time they probably weren't contemplating removing the "Other OS" function. There could be serious breach of contract issues depending on the language.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

I hope sony has to dish out repalcements for them......I doubt they will put it back...


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

EA has shuttered Maxis (The Sims, SimCity). Should it keep the Maxis name alive?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ZippyDSMleeI mean 4 main classes and maybe 3 or 4 model’s each…I’am just not seeing it….03/06/2015 - 8:28pm
ZippyDSMleeLame excuse is rather lame. Lets face it these days there there only a couple games that rely on such mechanics and it stifles player creativity to choose a body type for themselves and excludes those that wish to play as something closer to themselves.03/06/2015 - 8:17pm
Andrew EisenDoesn't matter if you play more games where the cast is the same basic character model. In this type of game, being able to easily tell which character you're looking at serves an important purpose.03/06/2015 - 7:29pm
ZippyDSMleeMechaCrash:Meh I've played more stuff that had pickups rather than set class's.03/06/2015 - 7:22pm
MechaCrashZarya's body type also has a pragmatic reason. Ever notice how in TF2, you can immediately tell who's who because they all have very different profiles? Same deal with Overwatch. If you see Zarya, you KNOW it's Zarya.03/06/2015 - 6:32pm
Adam802http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_27662192/leland-yee-case-judge-pushes-corruption-trial-august03/06/2015 - 6:12pm
ZippyDSMleeNearly anyway the new UT game has color at least. And wow they changed to C++ 0-o03/06/2015 - 5:43pm
ZippyDSMleeCraig R.: Same reason why UT99/04 and UT3 are diffrent, gritty is the thing to do...at least it was... nearly everyone else grew out of dark and gritty….03/06/2015 - 5:40pm
ZippyDSMleeI doubt each model of characters in COH/COV/CO,ect are kept as unique model data.03/06/2015 - 5:39pm
ZippyDSMleemodel shape.03/06/2015 - 5:38pm
ZippyDSMleeMonte:I think it’s more a part of the engine, yes its more work but you should be able to have some sort of physical collision system in place to keep arms and stuff from clipping. Outside of that the data stored is just number variables to change the m03/06/2015 - 5:38pm
Andrew EisenAt least she's smiling in one of the pics.03/06/2015 - 5:31pm
Craig R.It's like somebody took the color palette and decided that anything approaching 'bright' is unacceptable03/06/2015 - 5:30pm
Craig R.Scratching my head as to why DC shows are as dark and drab, color-wise, as the movies look to be03/06/2015 - 5:30pm
MonteIf for instance you make the character fat, you need to make sure the animation of the character moving his arms and gun around, won't result in them clipping into the character's larger stomach03/06/2015 - 5:22pm
Monte@zippy, I imagine creating customizabel, vastly different body types would add a lot more complexity. Like making sure the character's animation still looks right. It can be done, but it can get complicated03/06/2015 - 5:19pm
Andrew EisenSupergirl TV costume: http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/03/06/first-photos-of-supergirl-revealed03/06/2015 - 4:49pm
prh99I think it probably far easier to add a character than strip a feature from game engine that was baked in from the start.03/06/2015 - 4:45pm
Andrew EisenAs I've said twice already, yes, strides in one area do not absolve anyone from criticism over where else they're falling short.03/06/2015 - 3:04pm
ZippyDSMleeI know I know one thing is not the other. Still worth nagging about.I still do not see why they do not put in body sliders and elt people make thier own body types....I'd do fat/pudgy or chibi befor I do ultra generic prefect body......03/06/2015 - 2:59pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician