U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

May 13, 2010 -

The United States Air Force bought 336 PlayStation 3 consoles in 2009 as an initial purchase to create a 53 teraFlop cluster for processing data. Impressed with the power of Sony's home console system, the Air Force decided to buy another 2200 consoles. The whole project cost the Air Force (and by proxy the U.S. tax payers) $663,000.

These PS3 systems were configured with the "Other OS" feature, allowing the Air Force to use Linux to do whatever heavy lifting the project needed, but Sony's recent firmware update that removed that option may prove to be problematic for this work in the future.

"We will have to continue to use the systems we already have in hand," said an Air Force rep speaking with Ars Technica. "This will make it difficult to replace systems that break or fail. The refurbished PS3s also have the problem that when they come back from Sony, they have the firmware (gameOS) and it will not allow Other OS, which seems wrong. We are aware of class-action lawsuits against Sony for taking away this option on systems that used to have it."

While the Air Force made no further comment on the Class Action Lawsuit, it would probably fair to say that it hopes Sony will not prevail and it won't have to worry about the infamous firmware update removing the features it needs to continue its work..

Source: Ars Technica


Comments

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

"Oh man, sorry about your car, Kaz.  If only our smart bombs had had just a few more brain Cells to rub together, they wouldn't have been so far off target..."

 

;)

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

Um.... yeah I would bet that the Air Force falls under a whole different sales department, a sales department that will make sure the systems that are sold to the Air Force will work for the Air Force.  Typical company sales structure, not sure why everyone is like "oh noes the air force!"

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

There was no contract, they just bought them.

using PS3s was immensely cheaper than building computers from any of the contracted sources.  those guys saved the taxpayers something to the tune of $1-2 Million.

Here are we -- and yonder yawns the universe.

Here are we -- and yonder yawns the universe.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

On one hand its sucks that replacing the ps3 will be difficult if one of them broke down since the other os feature was remove. On the other hand the Air Force should have used real supercomputers and not gaming consoles.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

Note: The cell processor, was developed for the Army, for the Roadrunner machine (impressive machine, actually).

Sony, just "jumped in" and helped develop it even further.

The Air Force, decided to design their own super-computer using PS3, like NASA do (NASA buy off-the-shelf computers and make clusters too, some people claim that the "Beowulf" cluster is NASA invention, to the point that I saw many people calling it "NASA-style" cluster). Clusters, are a cheap way to make supercomputer, they are the same, PS3 actually, work better as cluster cell, than as gaming console (because its low, but extremely fast ram for example...)

 

So, a supercomputer built with PS3, IS a real computer, it is not a toy, not a bunch of gaming consoles. And it is easier to program than Roadrunner too... (Roadrunner is hell fast, but it is annoying to use, because it mixes Cell processors with Xeon, and they have diffrent architecture and way to work, and need to interact to reach full calculation speed... Roadrunner is like a gigantic Sega Saturn...)

 

 

Actually, it is Sony that should have made a real console, instead of a supercomputer part that is hell expensive... (altough, I DO like PS3... I am dieing to get my hands in one... And do all sorts of experiments and gaming on it...)

 

criadordejogos.wordpress.com

--- Maurício Gomes twitter.com/agfgames

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

These things are also popular for Clustering algorithms for dna sequences.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

They were likely trying to save some money.

 

If a fairly inexpensive device can do what a more expensive device can do, most would go or the less expensive device.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

That's exactly what they were doing.  IIRC, they stated that it would require a $2000 investment per computer to get a system built for them that can do what they need, as compared to a $600 per-unit PS3, which already had the ability, with the Other OS function.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

Hehe, and Sony said no one uses that feature?

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

I think Sony was refering to ther general public not private and goverment agencies. we Over here we have a cluster of 30 PS3s here on College. I'm sure the Air Force can get PS3s with that feature straight from Sony.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

No, no, no.  The Air Force already has those PS3's, and the firmware update removed the vital (for them) Other OS function, making their purchase of over $600,000 a complete waste, since they can no longer do what they needed them to do.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

I don't think that's what's being said jedi.  It reads like, "We have the PS3s and will continue to use them, but when we need to replace any, we're screwed."  I'd suspect they can get Sony to sell them PS3s with the old firmware though.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

I'd LOVE to get a look at tha purchase contract Sony signed with the Air Force. At the time they probably weren't contemplating removing the "Other OS" function. There could be serious breach of contract issues depending on the language.

Re: U.S. Air Force Comments on PS3 'Other Os' Removal

I hope sony has to dish out repalcements for them......I doubt they will put it back...


Until lobbying is a hanging offense I choose anarchy! CP/IP laws should not effect the daily life of common people! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenIn other words, a hero is male because that's the default. A hero is female because of a gender-related reason.03/31/2015 - 5:32pm
Andrew EisenHer point is that "When archetypal fantasy heroes in games are overwhelmingly portrayed as men, it reinforces the idea that... women should be able to empathize with male characters but that men needn’t be able to identify with women’s stories."03/31/2015 - 5:30pm
Andrew EisenDaniel - She doesn't say that in any of the TvW videos and I doubt she's said elsewhere that all games with male protagonists are male power fantasies. Anyway, you seem to be conflating two different ideas.03/31/2015 - 5:30pm
MaskedPixelantehttps://twitter.com/Yuriofwind/status/583028257890635776 Oh snap!03/31/2015 - 5:14pm
WymorenceFor me it just boils down to the fact that, even at a giant company, when a game comes out annually it just gives it a vibe of being rushed out the door. And god knows Unity sucked some major lemur with all its bugs...03/31/2015 - 4:22pm
PHX CorpI launched my spotify account today, and I kinda went a little overboard with adding music03/31/2015 - 3:59pm
Sora-ChanCon't. Games like AC are a pain to someone like me who likes to play games in order. So when a game gets too many releases too quickly, it puts me off. Only exceptions are games that have no interconnected underlying stories like the FF games.03/31/2015 - 2:53pm
Sora-ChanWikipedia has rarely let me down on matters like this. But yeah... AC needs a break.. like two.. or three... or eight years.03/31/2015 - 2:51pm
ConsterThere's 9 already?! I think I played 1, 2, and the ones inbetween 2 and 3.03/31/2015 - 2:23pm
Sora-ChanCon't There are now Nine... of just the main entries into the series. There are 13 more in the "other games" department.03/31/2015 - 2:15pm
Sora-ChanI tried to get into AC. Was having a decent time with the first one, at which point they had already released three titles. Then a fourth came out... then a fifth... the wall kept growing before I could finish the first.03/31/2015 - 2:14pm
Daniel LewisI think ubisoft should give AC a break before it's milked to death,and i'm a big fan of the games03/31/2015 - 1:15pm
PHX Corphttp://www.polygon.com/2015/3/31/8320017/assassins-creed-chronicles-china-india-russia Assassin's Creed Chronicles is now a trilogy, goes to China, India and Russia03/31/2015 - 1:11pm
Daniel LewisThe only thing said i disagree with is the final quote on Men's experiences are seen to be universal but women are gendered,though doesn't anita say that games with male protagonists are male power fantasies,so in turn both are gendered03/31/2015 - 1:08pm
Daniel Lewisi found the video to be much better than any of the TvW series and it's about time the positive women are put in the spotlight03/31/2015 - 1:06pm
Daniel LewisSo feministfrequency released a positive female character video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXmj2yJNUmQ03/31/2015 - 1:05pm
Daniel LewisI think the guy who made the direct leak said it was an april fools joke when a real one was announced03/31/2015 - 12:43pm
MaskedPixelanteNo way Nintendo would let information like that get out. Remember, they shut down a memoir about the localization of Earthbound by enforcing a 20 year old NDA on the author.03/31/2015 - 12:42pm
Andrew EisenOh, there's definitely a Nintendo Direct tomorrow, but that beat-by-beat recap is almost certainly bogus.03/31/2015 - 12:20pm
james_fudgeConster: the larger issue is that Ind. does not protect LGBTQ+ people under state law03/31/2015 - 12:11pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician