Merits of AHA & Nintendo Affiliation Debated

May 17, 2010 -

ABC News has a piece online which contains reactions to Nintendo’s just-announced partnership with the American Heart Association.

For starters, Nintendo did agree to pay the AHA $1.5 million dollars over three years in what was termed a “gift.” AHA President Dr. Clyde Yancy told ABC’s Health Editor Dr. Richard Besser that such corporate endeavors on the part of the AHA follow a “very deliberate process.”

 In regards to the dollars exchanging hands, Yancy stated, “Certainly resources have exchanged hands, because it takes quite a bit to launch a new initiative.” He added, “The logo’s not for sale.”

An Arizona-based doctor queried for his opinion on the deal took the approach that any exercise is better than none, offering, “I'm fully for encouraging children and adults to use interactive gaming and activity as a form of encouraging active behavior,” adding, “It's hard to wolf down Cheetos when you have a Wii controller in your hand.”

Dr. Dilip Jeste, director of the Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging served up his take on the partnership:

If a specialty organization believes that there is sufficient evidence of this type, it can recommend exergames as a class of products for specified purposes and in selected populations.

However, it should not recommend a specific product... unless there are independently conducted randomized controlled trials establishing its superiority over other types of exergames.

Last year, an American Council on Exercise study into the Wii as an exercise source resulted in a researcher indicating that Wii Sports was a better workout than Wii Fit.  The researcher stated, “I guess anything is better than nothing, but we were a little bit underwhelmed with the exercise intensity of some of the exercises. The Wii Fit is a very, very mild workout.”

Another study into actual energy expended while playing Wii Games caused the study’s author to state, “The range of energy expenditure in these active games is sufficient to prevent or to improve obesity and lifestyle-related disease, from heart disease and diabetes to metabolic diseases.”


Thanks Andrew!


Comments

Re: Merits of AHA & Nintendo Affiliation Debated

I'm not that fussed about the deal (although I think it illegitimises non-motion control games a bit too much), but "exergames" is quite possibly the worst word I've heard in a long time.

/b

Re: Merits of AHA & Nintendo Affiliation Debated

 Anyone who says that the yoga isn't a good workout is a damned dirty liar.

At any rate, I would imagine that the issue is that people want to see something like the Wii and exergames as a sort of cure-all, a panacea for our modern epidemic.  It's comforting to think that one of the "causes" of our current state of affairs can also be turned into a solution.

It seems as though - and correct me if I'm wrong here - there's a sense that just going for a run for a half an hour or doing some simple at-home exercises using stuff you have laying around is too anachronistic for our modern lifestyle.  It has to be somehow wired.

But I'm digressing.  If the AHA wants to team up with Nintendo, especially on the verge of the release of their heartbeat sensor, I honestly can't see why anyone would complain.  Hell, I don't care what anybody says - knowing your heartrate is the most important part of good cardio, so in many ways it's a no-brainer.

Re: Merits of AHA & Nintendo Affiliation Debated

I do admit I do feel a workout after a good long session of table tennis on Sports Resort

Re: Merits of AHA & Nintendo Affiliation Debated

The American Council on Exercise only looked at six of the dozens of activities in Wii Fit: "Free Run, Island Run, Free Step, Advanced Step, Super Hula Hoop, and Rhythm Boxing."  They looked at none of the yoga, strength or balance games.
 
 
Andrew Eisen

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Goth_Skunk"The New Totalitarians Are Here" from The Federalist. http://ow.ly/Pjz3b07/07/2015 - 11:31pm
MattsworknameThere was a time in america when we needed unions and they served a good purpose, but that time hasnt been tbe case for about 20 years or more. The same could be said of our current system for teachers in higher educatoin,but thats a whole nother story07/07/2015 - 10:22pm
TechnogeekIn large part, though, that's an extension of the level of unjust deference given to police in general. Kind of hard to find any real grievances to defend against when the organizational culture views "complains about coworker" as worse than "murderer".07/07/2015 - 8:45pm
TechnogeekThat's a police union.07/07/2015 - 8:43pm
TechnogeekNo, police unions are worse by far. Imagine every negative stereotype about unions, then add "we can get away with anything".07/07/2015 - 8:43pm
Goth_SkunkeZeek: No, I do not agree they are union members.07/07/2015 - 7:48pm
E. Zachary KnightTeachers unions are just as bad as police unions, except of course you are far less likely to be killed by a teacher on duty than you are a cop. But they also protect bad teachers from being fired.07/07/2015 - 6:29pm
E. Zachary KnightGoth, so you agree they are still union members. Thankfully we have a first ammendment that protects people from being forced to join groups they don't support (in most cases any way.)07/07/2015 - 6:27pm
E. Zachary KnightAh, police unions. The reason why cops can't get fired when they beat a defenseless mentally ill homeless person to death. Or when they throw a grenade into a baby's crib. Or when theykill people they were called in to help not hurt themselves.07/07/2015 - 6:26pm
Goth_SkunkeZeek: Non-union employees have no right to attend meetings or union convention/AGM, or influence policy. The only time they get to vote is whether or not to strike.07/07/2015 - 6:24pm
Infophile(cont'd) about non-union police officers being given hell until they joined the union.07/07/2015 - 4:58pm
InfophileParadoxically, the drive in the US to get rid of unions seems to have left only the most corrupt surviving. They seem to be the only ones that can find ways to browbeat employees into joining when paying dues isn't mandatory. I've heard some stories ...07/07/2015 - 4:57pm
Matthew WilsonI am old school on this. I believe its a conflict of interest to have public sector unions. that being said, I do not have a positive look on unions in general.07/07/2015 - 3:59pm
TechnogeekWhat's best for the employee tends to be good for the employer; other way around, not so much. So long as that's the case, there's going to be a far stronger incentive for management to behave in such a way that invites retalitation than for the union to.07/07/2015 - 3:10pm
TechnogeekTeachers' unions? State legislatures. UAW? Just look at GM's middle management.07/07/2015 - 3:05pm
TechnogeekIn many ways it seems that the worse a union tends to behave, the worse that the company's management has behaved in the past.07/07/2015 - 3:02pm
james_fudgeCharity starts at home ;)07/07/2015 - 2:49pm
james_fudgeSo mandatory charity? That sounds shitty to me07/07/2015 - 2:49pm
E. Zachary KnightGoth, if Union dues are automatically withdrawn, then there is no such thing as a non-union employee.07/07/2015 - 2:38pm
Goth_Skunka mutually agreed upon charity instead.07/07/2015 - 2:33pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician