ECA on SCOTUS Game Law Review: No Exaggeration, Medium Itself Is at Stake

May 25, 2010 -

Sister publication GameCulture recently sat down with Entertainment Consumer Association president Hal Halpin to discuss the serious ramifications of the Supreme Court's planned review of California's violent videogame law later this year. The lead-in to that interview follows below:

"Sometime later this year or early next, the Supreme Court will review EMA v. Schwarzenegger, California's violent videogame law. The law, which would have made it illegal to sell games the state found "excessively" violent to minors, was struck down by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court in 2009. A few weeks ago the Entertainment Consumers Association announced that it will be filing an amicus brief with the high court. GameCulture asked ECA president Hal Halpin about the case, its importance and the role of gamers in what will certainly become a landmark of videogame (and possibly constitutional) law."

Read the entire interview at GameCulture now.

[Disclosure: The ECA is the parent company of both GamePolitics and GameCulture.]


Comments

Re: ECA on SCOTUS Game Law Review: No Exaggeration, Medium ...

Why not have an uncensored European version and a censored American version. They did it with MK vs DC and Siren New Translations.

Re: ECA on SCOTUS Game Law Review: No Exaggeration, Medium ...

Sadly Japan has been kinda strict when it comes to violence now adays. They used to be A OK with it and had buckets of blood but for some reason it flip flopped. 0_o

Re: ECA on SCOTUS Game Law Review: No Exaggeration, Medium ...

I would like to mention, any game that gets released into Europe HAS to be popular in America first, so if the content of violence in games get banned in America, so then the market for the games decreases and they would not be sold in Europe either.

And the only violent games avaliable are those from Japan....

 

So here is a hint, import from Japan!!!!

TBoneTony

Re: ECA on SCOTUS Game Law Review: No Exaggeration, Medium ...

Damnit now they will have a way to totally ban some games entirly so not even adults can play them. >:(

Re: ECA on SCOTUS Game Law Review: No Exaggeration, Medium ...

If this passes I'm ready to start a petition to get it repealed because of the content censorship it will cause and import all my games from Europe.

Re: ECA on SCOTUS Game Law Review: No Exaggeration, Medium ...

Actually, with the entire American market dropped for some games, any of those games that would normally be produced in the USA will most likely no longer be produced, leaving only the companies outside. If this law passes in Court, then I actually am pretty much convinced less games will be produced as a result, nevermind translation from Japanese when only the Europe market remains.

Re: ECA on SCOTUS Game Law Review: No Exaggeration, Medium ...

The more gamers that helps with the amicus brief the better.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: ECA on SCOTUS Game Law Review: No Exaggeration, Medium ...

So long as we keep the immature idiot gamers out of it then sure, otherwise soem could royally screw it up for the rest of us.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenCurious to see who readers would want in a debate, I read the first few dozen comments and there are almost NO suggestions for GamerGate reps to debate. Sarkeesian pops up a couple times but she's not a games journalist.05/05/2015 - 12:11pm
Andrew EisenI've had discussions with a whole bunch of folks who identify as GamerGaters and, with a handful of exceptions on Twitter and Youtube, they were all reasonably polite and civil.05/05/2015 - 12:06pm
Wonderkarpmeet any of these "hornets" you profess to say surround me, I would be in Jail for Assault.05/05/2015 - 11:53am
WonderkarpI'll say this, Mecha. I've met a large number of people who support gamergate. None of them have come off as trollish aHole who want to see actual harm to anybody. They're all good people who have donated a good amount of money for Charity. If I were to05/05/2015 - 11:52am
PHX Corphttp://www.thinkcomputers.org/rockstar-changes-eula-and-bans-players-for-modding-gta-v/ Rockstar Changes EULA and Bans Players for Modding GTA V05/05/2015 - 11:37am
MechaCrashRemember when I said I oughta call you Jimmy Hornets? http://chainsawsuit.com/comic/2014/10/24/good-old-jim-hornets/ This is kinda relevant to the SPJ hashtag thing!05/05/2015 - 11:28am
Andrew EisenKarp - Come on, dude. That was obviously paraphrasing. Anyway, thanks to both of you for the links. Really interesting stuff that I look forward to watching unfold.05/05/2015 - 11:26am
WonderkarpRight. That quote is nowhere in the articles I linked below.05/05/2015 - 11:24am
MechaCrashYour articles say what mine did: "there were a few good points but they were lost in the flood of toxicity."05/05/2015 - 11:20am
WonderkarpYou mean wanting to engage in a conversation? which is what is happening, http://journoterrorist.com/airplay/ http://journoterrorist.com/2015/05/04/gamergate/ I hope you give these 2 a very good read. 05/05/2015 - 11:07am
MechaCrashhttp://blogs.spjnetwork.org/ethics/ The SPJ had to abandon the tag when GGers got all Gater-y.05/05/2015 - 10:34am
MechaCrashHey, speaking of GG, there was a thing on Twitter by the Society of Professional Journalists about ethics! Gaters found it and they had a calm and rational discussion about their concerns re: the video game industry! Oh wait, no, that's not what happened.05/05/2015 - 10:34am
james_fudgeyes.05/05/2015 - 6:30am
MattsworknameOn some days conster, i've wanted to rip into subjects like theres no tomarow, but some times, it's just not the time for it.05/05/2015 - 6:00am
MattsworknameConster, thats fine, and I understand what your saying, Im just saying that right now, baltimoore it not a subject to get into right now.05/05/2015 - 5:59am
ConsterMy comment was meant as "maybe people have done less hateful things 'in the name of GG' lately because they've moved on to other hateful activities", not a dig at GG itself.05/05/2015 - 4:29am
ConsterSecond, I based my remark on an actual article about trolls pretending to be Baltimore looters on Twitter using old photos, and their accounts having references to (among others) GG.05/05/2015 - 4:24am
ConsterIanC, EZK: there is nothing 'sick' or 'uncalled for' about what I said. First of all, I specifically said "*The trolls hiding behind* GG", which seperates the people making death and rape threats from GG, which is precisely what GG'ers want.05/05/2015 - 4:22am
MattsworknameHey, just a question, but did GP report on the UK teachers union threatening to report parents for letting kids play 18 plus games?05/05/2015 - 3:30am
Mattsworknamehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVLIgsf6qcs Jason comes to MKX, And you know what, yeah, he is right at home!05/04/2015 - 11:35pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician