ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

June 16, 2010 -

Entertainment Software Association (ESA) President Michael Gallagher is “humble” about how trade group might fare in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, as the nation’s highest court prepares to rule on Entertainment Merchants Association (EMA) v. Schwarzenegger, which centers on a California law that attempts to make it illegal to rent or sell violent videogames to underage consumers.

In a pre-E3 briefing recounted by Joystiq, Gallagher said about the case, “We believe we're on the side of right here. We've believed that for 10 years. That hasn't wavered one iota. You go into this preparing to win, but also very prepared to handle the other conclusions as well”

A win would allow the ESA to put legislative issues behind and return its focus to providing incentives for industry members. Gallagher added, “[State government] moves like lightning and moves -- depending on where you are -- in an informed or uninformed manner. If we win, then we feel we'll be done at long last with these content issues.”

Gallagher also worries that a California win in the Supreme Court would open movies, television and books to additional restrictive legislation.


Comments

Re: ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

I'm sure they won't even be thinking of the other media that might be censored because of this. Free speech might be pretty much dead for TV, video games, music, books and so on if this passes.

Re: ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

There's a way the court could uphold the law but not say that video games aren't protected as free speech. they could just rule that states could decide the issue for themselves (states rights), and figure if the federal government ever tried to regulate games over the whole country that THAT would be unconstitutional. 

That's whats different about this case as compared to, for example, the animal cruelty videos case. the animal cruelty case was a federal law, this is a state law. I think the conservatives on the court really do believe that the first amendment only applies to the federal government but they go along with the current interpretation of the 1st Amend because of precedent. They could at any time though break precedent, or they could use this case as a way to chip away at it/at least not expand it. 

Even though liberals are not as dependable on free speech as they use to be Im pretty confident that they will vote to overturn the law. And Kennedy the swing vote will very likely vote with them. and then there may be a couple conservatives that go along with overturning the law as well. I think Roberts could. So the worst I see at this point is 5 to 4 to overturn the law, and it probably wont be that close. especially because of how it could effect precedent regarding film, television, books, plays, etc...
 

Re: ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

In reading the original article, Gallagher honestly seemed more humble than confident.  Then again, that may not be a terrible strategy.  He certainly wouldn't want to start crowing about victory at this point.  Better to remain humble and put tons of efforts into those briefs and arguments!

Re: ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

Oh I'm confident SCOTUS will confirm games as free speech, the question is whether the free speech rights of adolescents can be restricted "for their own good" as is already the case with pornography.  In other words this case hinges upon whether the variable obscenity guideline can be extended to violent as well as sexual content (I'm no lawyer, but my understanding is it was intended for sexual content). 

However do keep in mind, extending the variable obscenity guideline to violence opens to door for massive regulation of not only video games but television, movies and books, regulation that could be chilling to all these industies and ultimately have a massive impact on the kinds of media adults are able to choose.

Re: ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

I'm hoping games are seen as free speech.

Re: ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

Confidence isn't a bad thing, however, do be prepared for the worst.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Banning in the legal sense? Not that I'm aware but there have certainly been groups of gamers who have worked towards getting content they don't like removed.07/28/2015 - 11:45pm
DanJAlexander's editorial was and continues to be grossly misrepresented by her opponents. And if you don't like a site, you stop reading it - same as not watching a tv show. They get your first click, but not your second.07/28/2015 - 11:40pm
TechnogeekYes, because actively trying to convince advertisers to influence the editorial content of media is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, especially for a movement that's ostensibly about journalistic ethics.07/28/2015 - 11:02pm
Mattsworknameanother07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
Mattsworknameyou HAVE TO click on it. So they get the click revenue weather you like what it says or not. as such, the targeting of advertisers most likely seemed like a good course of action to those who wanted to hold those media groups accountable for one reason07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
MattsworknameBut, when you look at online media, it's completely different, with far more options, but far few ways to address issues that the consumers may have. In tv, you don't like what they show, you don't watch. But in order to see if you like something online07/28/2015 - 9:12pm
MattsworknameIn tv, and radio, ratings are how it works. your ratings determine how well you do and how much money you an charge.07/28/2015 - 9:02pm
Mattsworknameexpect to do so without someone wanting to hold you to task for it07/28/2015 - 9:00pm
MattsworknameMecha: I don't think anyone was asking for Editoral changes, what they wanted was to show those media groups that if they were gonna bash there own audiance, the audiance was not gonna take it sitting down. you can write what you want, but you can't07/28/2015 - 8:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew, Im asking as a practical question, Have gamers, as a group, ever asked for a game, or other item, to be banned. Im trying to see if theres any cases anyone else remembers cause I cant find or remember any.07/28/2015 - 8:55pm
Andrew EisenAs mentioned, Gamasutra isn't a gaming site, it's a game industry site. I don't feel it's changed its focus at all. Also, I don't get the sense that the majority of the people who took issue with that one opinion piece were regular readers anyway.07/28/2015 - 8:43pm
MattsworknameDitto kotaku, Gawker, VOX, Polygon, ETC07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
MechaTama31So, between pulling a game from one chain of stores, and forcing editorial changes to a media source, only one of them strikes you as being on the edge of censorship, and it's the game one?07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
Andrew EisenHave gamers ever tried to ban a product? Can you be more specific? I'm not clear what you're getting at.07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
Mattsworknamethey should have expected some kind of blow back. But I didn't participate in that specific action07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
MattsworknameAndrew Youd have to ask others about that, I actualyl didn't have much beef with them till last year, so I can't speak to there history. I simply feel that gamesutra chose politics over gaming and chose to make enimies of it's prime audiance. For that,07/28/2015 - 8:40pm
Andrew EisenI'm still not clear on how Gamasutra was lacking in accountability or what it was lacking in accountability for.07/28/2015 - 8:38pm
MattsworknameAndrew: You and I agree on most of that. I don't diagree that there should ahve been other actions taken. Now, I do want to point something out, casue Im not sure if it's happened. Have gamers ever tried to have a product banned?07/28/2015 - 8:37pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician