ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

June 16, 2010 -

Entertainment Software Association (ESA) President Michael Gallagher is “humble” about how trade group might fare in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, as the nation’s highest court prepares to rule on Entertainment Merchants Association (EMA) v. Schwarzenegger, which centers on a California law that attempts to make it illegal to rent or sell violent videogames to underage consumers.

In a pre-E3 briefing recounted by Joystiq, Gallagher said about the case, “We believe we're on the side of right here. We've believed that for 10 years. That hasn't wavered one iota. You go into this preparing to win, but also very prepared to handle the other conclusions as well”

A win would allow the ESA to put legislative issues behind and return its focus to providing incentives for industry members. Gallagher added, “[State government] moves like lightning and moves -- depending on where you are -- in an informed or uninformed manner. If we win, then we feel we'll be done at long last with these content issues.”

Gallagher also worries that a California win in the Supreme Court would open movies, television and books to additional restrictive legislation.


Comments

Re: ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

I'm sure they won't even be thinking of the other media that might be censored because of this. Free speech might be pretty much dead for TV, video games, music, books and so on if this passes.

Re: ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

There's a way the court could uphold the law but not say that video games aren't protected as free speech. they could just rule that states could decide the issue for themselves (states rights), and figure if the federal government ever tried to regulate games over the whole country that THAT would be unconstitutional. 

That's whats different about this case as compared to, for example, the animal cruelty videos case. the animal cruelty case was a federal law, this is a state law. I think the conservatives on the court really do believe that the first amendment only applies to the federal government but they go along with the current interpretation of the 1st Amend because of precedent. They could at any time though break precedent, or they could use this case as a way to chip away at it/at least not expand it. 

Even though liberals are not as dependable on free speech as they use to be Im pretty confident that they will vote to overturn the law. And Kennedy the swing vote will very likely vote with them. and then there may be a couple conservatives that go along with overturning the law as well. I think Roberts could. So the worst I see at this point is 5 to 4 to overturn the law, and it probably wont be that close. especially because of how it could effect precedent regarding film, television, books, plays, etc...
 

Re: ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

In reading the original article, Gallagher honestly seemed more humble than confident.  Then again, that may not be a terrible strategy.  He certainly wouldn't want to start crowing about victory at this point.  Better to remain humble and put tons of efforts into those briefs and arguments!

Re: ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

Oh I'm confident SCOTUS will confirm games as free speech, the question is whether the free speech rights of adolescents can be restricted "for their own good" as is already the case with pornography.  In other words this case hinges upon whether the variable obscenity guideline can be extended to violent as well as sexual content (I'm no lawyer, but my understanding is it was intended for sexual content). 

However do keep in mind, extending the variable obscenity guideline to violence opens to door for massive regulation of not only video games but television, movies and books, regulation that could be chilling to all these industies and ultimately have a massive impact on the kinds of media adults are able to choose.

Re: ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

I'm hoping games are seen as free speech.

Re: ESA Chief on SCOTUS Case: Confident, Yet Humble

Confidence isn't a bad thing, however, do be prepared for the worst.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenOoo, this one came down to the wire! https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/749082525/nefarious09/19/2014 - 1:03am
Andrew EisenI don't doubt that many are truly interested in journalistic integrity. The problem I'm often seeing is they seem to have no idea how or where to talk about it.09/18/2014 - 11:46pm
Andrew EisenDidn't word that well. Busy at work. I've seen people claim that GamerGate is solely about ethics and transparency in games journalism and then go on to show that what they're really after is silencing those who talk about gender issues in games.09/18/2014 - 11:45pm
Kronodebate. Becaus apparently people who only post on Reddit are supposed to police twitter before they're allowed to question anything about the people involved.09/18/2014 - 10:40pm
KronoI highly doubt many, if any are using journalistic integrity as a cover for harassment. The people harassing are essentially trolls. They aren't interested in subtle. More often it's othe other way around. People use "but X is being harassed" to shut down09/18/2014 - 10:38pm
Andrew EisenAnd exacerbating everything is the fact that all the cries of ethics violations have been obnoxious and easily proven false.09/18/2014 - 8:59pm
Andrew EisenProblem is, I would imagine, the sheer number of people who are using journalistic integrity as a cover for their harassing actions or only bringing it up on the false pretense of journalistic integrity.09/18/2014 - 8:47pm
Andrew EisenHaving said that, I can certainly see how one would be frustrated if they truly just wanted to talk about journalistic integrity and someone said they were one of the people harassing Sarkeesian, Quinn and others (though I've seen no examples of that).09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoThat's been the common refrain, that talk of journalism ethics is just an excuse to harass people.09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoLines like "like a partial compromise with the howling trolls who’ve latched onto ‘ethics’ as the latest flag in their onslaught against evolution and inclusion." are taring everyone questioning the ethics as a harasser.09/18/2014 - 8:43pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Except, none of the articles were talking about gamers complaining about journalist ethics, let alone called them white male misogynists. They were talking about the gamers who were harassing others.09/18/2014 - 8:36pm
Kronomakes plenty of sense. It's rather hard to dismiss someone as a white guy running a sock puppet when they've posted proof they're a woman, or black, or another minority.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat any critics of journalists were white guys that hated women, and could be dismissed as such. It seems to have helped some. It's kind of difficult to maintain the white guy narrative in the face of a bunch of women and non-white guys. So the tag09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat, someone vented on a #gamergate 4chan thread about being dismissed like that. The suggestion they got in return was to organize their own hashtag in response, with #NotYourShield being suggested. Thus the tag came into use to combat the undercurrent09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronomuch more general problem. And while several of the articles were fairly tame, they spured a bunch of people to dismiss any critics of the journalism involved as misogynistic men. Usually with insults aimed at the geek stereotype. After about a week of09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - Not sure what that has to do with anything but yeah, the gender percentages differ depending on how the study defines what a gamer is.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
KronoThe rhetoric pushed by the spearheading articles that the "gamers" complaining about journalist ethics were just angry white male misogynists, insulted a lot of people that were previously fairly neutral. It made it go from a Kotaku problem, to a09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Krono@Andrew I'm not surprised overlap exists. I expect much of it is a rush to jump on the bandwagon, either by reporting on the original articles, or rushing out their own. The point is that was a major flashpoint, much bigger than the reddit mass deletion.09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Sleaker@AE - well the gamer trend was described with stats on Factual Femenist. Only 1 in 7 males plays games 20+ hrs going into college vs 1 in 40 females. So gaming is definitely still male dominated despite fake stats trying to say otherwise.09/18/2014 - 8:30pm
Craig R.Do conspiracies ever make sense? The fact that people are now having to defend themselves against nutjob websites like Breitbart.com shows how far down into the rabbit hole we've all been forcibly dragged.09/18/2014 - 7:05pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician