Can MSFT’s New Tech Kinect with the Disabled?

June 22, 2010 -

While skeptical of how well Microsoft’s Xbox 360 controller-free technology will work with disabled gamers, a leading advocacy group still sees it as a step in the right direction.

After witnessing the unveiling of Kinect at E3, AbleGamer’s Steve Spohn initially said that the technology would be “largely useless” to the disabled gamers reading his website, as the “entire point of Kinect is to get you and your friends off of the couch and more active while playing video games.”

After some reflection however, Spohn labeled Kinect’s voice command ability “more mentionable than the motion detection itself,” adding, “voice commands are a form of accessible technology enabling me to play more complex games and to use remote controls.”

A Microsoft spokesperson told AbleGamers that new technology, such as Kinect, would not “always immediately work for some people because of the inherent physical nature of the gameplay.” The company pledged to keep working on the technology however, stating that it hoped to “learn from the Accessibility community about the scenarios and features that will allow Kinect to appeal to more users.”

Spohn was happy with this response, as formulaic as it might have been, because “for the very first time we have tangible evidence that a company as large as Microsoft is taking notice of what we have all been doing in the game accessibility movement.”

The author on Kinect’s current limitations for certain disabled people:

We already know that Kinect does not work in most situations from a seated position, which is bad for those in wheelchairs or who can't stand for any length of time. The system also requires precise and smooth movements to control the controller-less hand, which is incredibly bad for those with Cerebral Palsy or Multiple Sclerosis.

Spohn advised disabled gamers to “Take an inventory on your own abilities and figure out if the Kinect can add anything to your quality of life. If it can, don't be afraid to try it out in November, but it doesn't look like it is right for you, don't be upset.”


Thanks Dan!


Comments

Re: Can MSFT’s New Tech Kinect with the Disabled?

Steve Spohn commenting on the voice capability as a good thing apparently doesn't realize that there is currently no planned uses for the Kinect with "just" voice commands.  Apparently, according to Microsoft, even the movie-watching features require you to stand to make use of it.

Yep, you gotta stand to watch a movie using Kinect.  Lame.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Can MSFT’s New Tech Kinect with the Disabled?

If I can sit on my sofa to interact with my wii, I should be able t osit in on my sofa to use Kinect if I don't feel like standing.

Re: Can MSFT’s New Tech Kinect with the Disabled?

Microsoft has announced that Kinect's technology is incompatible with a sitting person.  Apparently, it cannot properly register your skeleton if you are sitting, so nothing requiring the motion tracking can be done outside of a standing position.

This includes watching movies, as the software for interacting with the movies via Kinect requires body movement as well as voice commands.

MS has stated they "hope" to have that issue addressed by launch, but I don't see them completely re-writing the skeletal recognition software - which is pretty much ALL of the Kinect software - in a few months.

You can't even play the driving games for Kinect from a seated position!  How fucking lame is that?  Who STANDS to drive?

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Can MSFT’s New Tech Kinect with the Disabled?

I wonder how long it will take for the lawsuits to start?

Re: Can MSFT’s New Tech Kinect with the Disabled?

Well, one serial suing jackass might demand it be compatible with WoW, or something.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
james_fudgeyes.05/05/2015 - 6:30am
MattsworknameOn some days conster, i've wanted to rip into subjects like theres no tomarow, but some times, it's just not the time for it.05/05/2015 - 6:00am
MattsworknameConster, thats fine, and I understand what your saying, Im just saying that right now, baltimoore it not a subject to get into right now.05/05/2015 - 5:59am
ConsterMy comment was meant as "maybe people have done less hateful things 'in the name of GG' lately because they've moved on to other hateful activities", not a dig at GG itself.05/05/2015 - 4:29am
ConsterSecond, I based my remark on an actual article about trolls pretending to be Baltimore looters on Twitter using old photos, and their accounts having references to (among others) GG.05/05/2015 - 4:24am
ConsterIanC, EZK: there is nothing 'sick' or 'uncalled for' about what I said. First of all, I specifically said "*The trolls hiding behind* GG", which seperates the people making death and rape threats from GG, which is precisely what GG'ers want.05/05/2015 - 4:22am
MattsworknameHey, just a question, but did GP report on the UK teachers union threatening to report parents for letting kids play 18 plus games?05/05/2015 - 3:30am
Mattsworknamehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVLIgsf6qcs Jason comes to MKX, And you know what, yeah, he is right at home!05/04/2015 - 11:35pm
Mattsworknameequally importat reaons . I find it strange that worf says something i agree with so much, yet i know people who woudl fight bloodily about it. Kinda silly05/04/2015 - 10:56pm
MattsworknameI mysef love both of them, Im a huge fan of wars and trek, and It was a big part of my childhood for different, but e05/04/2015 - 10:55pm
MechaTama31I really liked the first reboot Trek. Of course, I have generally liked other Abrams movies. The newer Trek movie had its moments, but wasn't as good, imho.05/04/2015 - 10:43pm
Craig R.Wife is a huge Wars fan, doesn't think much of Abrams either. So, we've found some common ground...05/04/2015 - 10:39pm
Craig R.I'm more of a Trek than Wars fan, but haven't watched either reboot film, don't care for Abrams05/04/2015 - 10:38pm
MechaTama31RE: Trek vs. Wars, I've always liked both, and although I often hear it said that the fanbases are at odds, I have never seen a shred of that in real life. Online, sure, but the internet amplifies that kind of thing, we all know that.05/04/2015 - 10:23pm
MechaTama31Because GG "tainted" those other opinions, and you couldn't express them without also implying support for all the other crap the jerk faces did.05/04/2015 - 10:19pm
MechaTama31Any GG-related discussion I got involved in, if someone expressed anything even tangentially supportive of anything GG supported, that person was guilty by association of everything GG did (whether they mentioned GG or not).05/04/2015 - 10:18pm
MechaTama31"There's no need for anyone who's not a jerk face to admit to vile actions they didn't commit." That's a nice thought, AE, but that's certainly not how it goes down, even here.05/04/2015 - 10:17pm
Goth_SkunkI for one do agree with him. I always have, as a fan of both franchises. Hopefully with J.J. Abrams doing both the Star Wars AND the Star Trek films, that'll help mend this silly rift between fanbases.05/04/2015 - 9:50pm
MattsworknameWell said MR worf, well said, but I doubt the treks and the star wars fans agree05/04/2015 - 9:44pm
PHX CorpMichael Dorn tells Star Trek and Star Wars fans that both fanbases are all part of the same Scifi family https://twitter.com/akaWorf/status/59528225364038860805/04/2015 - 9:29pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician