ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

July 14, 2010 -

While the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) has until September 10 to file its own brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in regards to Schwarzenegger v. EMA, the organization issued a statement in reaction to a brief filed by the state of California on Monday.

Trumpeting the ESA's dominating string of victories in such cases, and perhaps attempting to take some of the wind out of the sails of California State Senator Leland Yee, ESA President and CEO Michael Gallagher stated:

Computer and video games are First Amendment protected speech. There is an unbroken chain of more than a dozen previous court rulings agreeing. Courts across the country recognize that computer and video games, like other protected expression such as movies, books, and music, have an artistic viewpoint, and use sounds and images to create an experience and immerse the player in art. That is why other courts have unanimously affirmed that video games are entitled to the same constitutional protection as movies, music, books, and other forms of art.

California’s law is no different than others before it. It is clearly unconstitutional under First Amendment principles. We look forward to presenting our arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States and vigorously defending the works of our industry’s creators, storytellers and innovators.


Comments

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I hope for this law to fail just to see Mr. Yee and the governator cry like babies.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

How about because it's a bad law?

Seriously, guys, let's be adults here.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

"California’s law is no different than others before it. It is clearly unconstitutional under First Amendment principles."

Forget constitutionality.  Hell, forget the niggling detail that there's no harm to protect children from in the first place.

This law, flat-out, would not work.  It would do nothing to prevent children from playing violent games (even if they did cause harm).  I think that's enough to shoot it down right there.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Hasn't exactly stopped the drinking age or the drug war.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Yes, the CA law certainly isn't alone in that regard.  Plenty laws that any 6-year-old could tell you wouldn't work make it on the books.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

It's been my experience that most 6 year olds have a lot more sense than many adults.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I just realized there has been no mention of the ESRB ratings (a private organization) being given the force of law.  I take it then that the law is looking for alternative methods of determining which games are "offensive"?

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Yeah. The law is not based on the ESRB ratings or anything like that. It is based on a definition of "excessive violence" that is put in place by whom ever is the elected official in the city in which the complaint is raised or the state Attorney General.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I call california's Brief The equiviant of Jack thompson's bizzare Commentary on his Lawsuits

Watching JT on GP is just like watching an episode of Jerry springer only as funny as the fights

America has just became its own version of the Jerry Springer Show after a bizarre moment in Florida involving a carnival worker.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I don't think it's quite on the same level as JT's bizarre rantings.  It's dead wrong, of course, but it's not completely insane.

I think that's the main difference between Thompson and Yee.  Yee's basically a good guy, he's polite and he engages the video game community with respect.  I disagree, fundamentally, with his stance, and I believe, strongly, that he's wasting the time and money of a state that's already in dire financial straits in order to attempt to curtail freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment.  But at least he's not a raving lunatic.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I think that Yee is a douche and he just is educated enough to deguise it behind a polite attitude, but when everything this fail (and it will) we will see his real face, not very far of what Jack Thompson was some years ago.

No one can claim that an entire industry and its users are a danger for society and being 100% polite.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Now see, calling someone childish names because he disagrees with you IS the sort of thing JT's famous for.  This is the exact point I'm making -- we can disagree with people like Yee without stooping to JT's level, and Yee can show the same respect to us.

I don't agree with the guy, I think his position is utterly wrongheaded and misguided, and I think his crusade is a spectacularly bad idea.  But he doesn't go around calling people douches.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Call you names? He threatens to sue every other person.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Er, you know he's a state senator, not a practicing lawyer, right?

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

You mean how he was extremely sure he would come out victorious but all he was doing was taking someone's pencil and going "Haha, now you can't write!!!"

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Should ‘sexism’ factor into a video game’s rating?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
mthielNew report on Adam Lanza http://tinyurl.com/pnj9os611/21/2014 - 8:07pm
Andrew EisenIf you missed the HuffPost segment I guested on, the replay is now embedded in the story.11/21/2014 - 6:05pm
Wonderkarphttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2__4yZCcAA9Ytp.jpg these look amazing. Peach is the only one I'm tempted to open cause her packaging is bent. get another nonbent one....man. toycollector me and gamecollector me is fighting11/21/2014 - 5:51pm
WonderkarpJust finalized my Smash Bros free Sound Track Order. Also got 4 amiibos and they look fantastic. I'm afraid to open them. they look spectacular!11/21/2014 - 5:45pm
james_fudgeCan we all agree that Andrew cleans up nicely and can go on any program?11/21/2014 - 5:01pm
Wonderkarpthank you for that line, Andrew. alot of great films fail the bechdel test. Gravity fails it and it has a female lead.11/21/2014 - 4:48pm
Andrew EisenAw, thanks James! Well, now I have to drive back to work!11/21/2014 - 4:45pm
Andrew EisenDidn't have a chance to say this on the HuffPost segment but while the Bechdel test is useful as a broad examination of gender representation in media, it's not at all appropriate as a judgment of quality.11/21/2014 - 4:45pm
james_fudgeAndrew you killed it!11/21/2014 - 4:44pm
WonderkarpMadeline Bergman. second female, they never speak of men, just a computer program. it passes the test11/21/2014 - 4:34pm
E. Zachary KnightDoes Other M have more than one woman in it?11/21/2014 - 4:31pm
Wonderkarpyet Metroid Other M, a game where people cried sexist due to the commanding officers restricting Samus, passes the test....11/21/2014 - 4:21pm
Wonderkarpwait...they are using the bechdel test to determine which games are sexist?.....how does that work with a game like Super Mario Bros when there is no Dialogue? test itself is BS. Alien doesn't pass it11/21/2014 - 4:20pm
james_fudgeAndrew Eisen on Ice! Please join in at 4:23 pm et and support our bestie! http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/sweden-sexism-video-game/546d41cffe344486d400023711/21/2014 - 4:05pm
Matthew Wilsonthose are the same people that said google should pay to list news sites in their news reader, and than accused google of blackmail when google said no and delisted them.11/21/2014 - 4:03pm
Wonderkarpwait....europe can dismantle a company not founded in europe?11/21/2014 - 3:54pm
NeenekoHrm, that does raise interesting questions about anti-trust laws and transnational corporations.11/21/2014 - 3:54pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/11/europes-parliament-poised-to-call-for-a-break-up-of-google/ what is with Europe? good think they dont have the power to do it. worse comes to worse google can block any European country that tries.11/21/2014 - 3:49pm
Andrew EisenFun Fact: Back when it was new, I was linked to that docket by three separate people in the same day. It was submitted as proof of their claim. In all three cases, the docket didn't even address what they were talking about. Did any of them read it?11/21/2014 - 3:00pm
Wonderkarpits not a piece. its just a press docket. its like a wiki11/21/2014 - 2:52pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician