ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

July 14, 2010 -

While the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) has until September 10 to file its own brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in regards to Schwarzenegger v. EMA, the organization issued a statement in reaction to a brief filed by the state of California on Monday.

Trumpeting the ESA's dominating string of victories in such cases, and perhaps attempting to take some of the wind out of the sails of California State Senator Leland Yee, ESA President and CEO Michael Gallagher stated:

Computer and video games are First Amendment protected speech. There is an unbroken chain of more than a dozen previous court rulings agreeing. Courts across the country recognize that computer and video games, like other protected expression such as movies, books, and music, have an artistic viewpoint, and use sounds and images to create an experience and immerse the player in art. That is why other courts have unanimously affirmed that video games are entitled to the same constitutional protection as movies, music, books, and other forms of art.

California’s law is no different than others before it. It is clearly unconstitutional under First Amendment principles. We look forward to presenting our arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States and vigorously defending the works of our industry’s creators, storytellers and innovators.


Comments

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I hope for this law to fail just to see Mr. Yee and the governator cry like babies.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

How about because it's a bad law?

Seriously, guys, let's be adults here.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

"California’s law is no different than others before it. It is clearly unconstitutional under First Amendment principles."

Forget constitutionality.  Hell, forget the niggling detail that there's no harm to protect children from in the first place.

This law, flat-out, would not work.  It would do nothing to prevent children from playing violent games (even if they did cause harm).  I think that's enough to shoot it down right there.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Hasn't exactly stopped the drinking age or the drug war.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Yes, the CA law certainly isn't alone in that regard.  Plenty laws that any 6-year-old could tell you wouldn't work make it on the books.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

It's been my experience that most 6 year olds have a lot more sense than many adults.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I just realized there has been no mention of the ESRB ratings (a private organization) being given the force of law.  I take it then that the law is looking for alternative methods of determining which games are "offensive"?

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Yeah. The law is not based on the ESRB ratings or anything like that. It is based on a definition of "excessive violence" that is put in place by whom ever is the elected official in the city in which the complaint is raised or the state Attorney General.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I call california's Brief The equiviant of Jack thompson's bizzare Commentary on his Lawsuits

Watching JT on GP is just like watching an episode of Jerry springer only as funny as the fights

America has just became its own version of the Jerry Springer Show after a bizarre moment in Florida involving a carnival worker.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I don't think it's quite on the same level as JT's bizarre rantings.  It's dead wrong, of course, but it's not completely insane.

I think that's the main difference between Thompson and Yee.  Yee's basically a good guy, he's polite and he engages the video game community with respect.  I disagree, fundamentally, with his stance, and I believe, strongly, that he's wasting the time and money of a state that's already in dire financial straits in order to attempt to curtail freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment.  But at least he's not a raving lunatic.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

I think that Yee is a douche and he just is educated enough to deguise it behind a polite attitude, but when everything this fail (and it will) we will see his real face, not very far of what Jack Thompson was some years ago.

No one can claim that an entire industry and its users are a danger for society and being 100% polite.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Now see, calling someone childish names because he disagrees with you IS the sort of thing JT's famous for.  This is the exact point I'm making -- we can disagree with people like Yee without stooping to JT's level, and Yee can show the same respect to us.

I don't agree with the guy, I think his position is utterly wrongheaded and misguided, and I think his crusade is a spectacularly bad idea.  But he doesn't go around calling people douches.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Call you names? He threatens to sue every other person.

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

Er, you know he's a state senator, not a practicing lawyer, right?

Re: ESA Responds to Schwarzenegger v. EMA California Brief

You mean how he was extremely sure he would come out victorious but all he was doing was taking someone's pencil and going "Haha, now you can't write!!!"

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which Feminist Frequency video are you looking forward to most?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MechaTama31Goth_Skunk: It's not too late for CiVIlization... ;)01/28/2015 - 12:40am
MechaCrashI thought one of its other big issues was all the "quality" of phone games with all the portability of your television.01/27/2015 - 11:34pm
E. Zachary KnightApparently, people did not want a $100 console, they wanted a $200 one for a $100 price tag.01/27/2015 - 11:18pm
E. Zachary KnightI remember when people were demanding Ouya used the new and untested Tegra 4 processor rather than the tried and true Tegra 3, increase the RAM to 2Gigs and various other expensive addons.01/27/2015 - 11:17pm
ConsterCraig: perhaps I should've used the word "unreasonable", as in people clamoring for stretch goals that would guarantee they lose money on each deck.01/27/2015 - 10:04pm
Andrew EisenIt's my favorite movie. I'm looking forward to it as well.01/27/2015 - 9:16pm
Goth_SkunkI grew up idolizing Ghostbusters. I'm extremely excited to see another film.01/27/2015 - 8:52pm
Goth_SkunkEscapist -- via Hollywood reporter -- gives us a glimpse at the probable cast of the new Ghostbuster's movie: http://ow.ly/I3GyZ01/27/2015 - 8:51pm
Craig R.Nearly $4.2m in a week for Exploding Kittens. Can anything truly be unrealistic at this point?01/27/2015 - 8:50pm
prh99I am sure. Just have no interest in tropes in general or her take on gender portrayal.01/27/2015 - 7:44pm
Goth_SkunkI personally enjoy replacing letters with numbers in titles of movies and games. I think Firaxis missed out on a huge chuckle by calling it "Civilization V" and not "CiVilization."01/27/2015 - 7:20pm
Andrew EisenI bet I can guess how you voted!01/27/2015 - 7:02pm
prh99Never actually watched one, probably won't start.01/27/2015 - 6:15pm
E. Zachary KnightConster, when are unrealistic stretch goal demands anything new? They happen in every Kickstarter I have seen.01/27/2015 - 5:58pm
E. Zachary KnightAE: You forgot the "The video that conforms to my preconceived ideas about gender in games" option.01/27/2015 - 5:56pm
PHX Corp@Conster ok, randomly put 5 golden tickets into the boxes and anyone who gets a golden ticket gets to go and visit Willy Wonka's chocolate factory!, is a ultra-ridiculous stretch goal suggested by a backer01/27/2015 - 5:53pm
ConsterApparently they're unaware that unlike with video games, card games have a large constant factor in cost-per-unit.01/27/2015 - 5:24pm
ConsterIn other news, Exploding Kittens (https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/elanlee/exploding-kittens) has over 100k backers now, a few of which are calling for unrealistic stretch goals.01/27/2015 - 5:23pm
ConsterIt's cool in Numb3rs, but not really anywhere else.01/27/2015 - 5:20pm
james_fudgeI hate that style of naming too01/27/2015 - 4:34pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician