McMahon Closes Gap on Blumenthal as CT. Primary Unfolds

August 10, 2010 -

Even though Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal had a few moments of shame after he was caught overstating his military service earlier in the year, he managed to stay well ahead of his Republican rival, but things are changing rapidly.

That’s because, it seems, that Linda McMahon has the momentum, according to the latest polls so much so, in fact, that a Reuters story from Sunday has the political chattering classes in the state afraid to place any bets on who might win in Nov. Connecticut’s primary is today, and while McMahon and Blumenthal will have a fairly easy time rolling over their party's challenges to incumbency (barring any surprises), their match-up this November won't be a cake-walk for either of them.

What's most interesting about this race is that both candidates have a history with videogames. For Blumenthal it has been against video games in general, and for McMahon it has been as a character in videogames based on the company she ran for a very long time.

Blumenthal, who recently signed his state on to an amicus brief supporting California's video game law, may be outmatched in his bid for Chris Dodd's soon-to-be vacated Senate seat.

According to Reuters, McMahon has donated her campaign $50 million from her own personal funds and has been able to hire the best people, create the slickest political ads and generally get the message out to her target audience: independents and women.

Meanwhile, Blumenthal has only managed to raise a paltry $3.5 million, and is struggling both in the polls and in his strategy to reach out to voters that aren't from his own base. It's proving to be tough if you believe the polls. Analysts add that McMahon is carefully spending her campaign war chest.

"We have a genuine horse race. I wouldn't want predict the outcome," Gary Rose, professor of politics at Sacred Heart University in Fairfield, Connecticut told Reuters. "Her resources are off the chart. We've never seen anything like this in Connecticut. It's really a juggernaut."

"Her resources have allowed her to hire a really very skilled team. Her ads have been quite compelling," Rose added.

But having the money and gaining momentum isn't enough for McMahon, who has her fair share of problems that mostly go back to her work as CEO of WWE, her husband's antics and several tragedies that have plagued the sports entertainment company in the last couple of years.

It will, at the very least, be one of the more entertaining races to watch this political season.

Source: Reuters


Comments

Re: McMahon Closes Gap on Blumenthal as CT. Primary Unfolds

Linda officially won the nomination. It's unfortuante that Blumenthal's only tactic thus far has been to act as a moral guardian and arbiter of taste by bringing up the content of WWE's programming over a decade ago when Linda was not even involved in the creative aspect. And the Democratic Party has stated they will continue to hammer this rather than the issues. It almost reminds me of the Right to Censor gimmick the then-WWF was doing at that time. I originally believed the Democratic Party was about letting people live their lives and standing up to the self-righteous Christian Coalition hypocrites that dominate the GOP, but they have become just as bad, if not worse, and was one of the major reasons why I left the party.

Re: McMahon Closes Gap on Blumenthal as CT. Primary Unfolds

Because we all know if Linda is elected she will do the following....

*Enter the Senate to her Theme Music.

*Appoint Mae Young's Hand to handle social issues involving the elderly and African Americans.

*Will kill off Christianity and support satanic worshipping due to The Undertaker.

*Will give both the House and Senate the finger.

*When her bills pass, she'll share beers with everyone.

*Will tell those that disagree with her to suck it.

And so on.

 

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will an M rating hurt Batman: Arkham Knight's sales?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ZippyDSMleeEh still rather subjective… the haters would be better off going after teen and beauty rags and magazines than fiction, fiction follows reality and going after fiction tends to turn into a bullying fest’s… plus its fiction its unrealistic to start with….02/27/2015 - 1:10am
MechaTama31That's a pretty difficult anatomy to break.02/26/2015 - 11:09pm
MechaTama31"the way her animations repeatedly break her anatomy" <-- I'm sorry, but we are talking here about the woman who can roll up into a little ball and live to tell the tale, yes? ;)02/26/2015 - 11:09pm
Andrew EisenAs far as examples that could be culled from female game characters though, that one's pretty mild.02/26/2015 - 9:11pm
Andrew EisenNot as much the heels or the suit in and of themselves but certainly the way her animations repeatedly break her anatomy to show off her lady bits.02/26/2015 - 9:10pm
E. Zachary KnightWell, Samus's heels are certainly impracticable, but I wouldn't really call her Zero suit objectified. I don't really feel that the new Lara Croft is objectified either, but that is my subjective opinion.02/26/2015 - 9:08pm
Andrew EisenTomb Raider: No but we haven't seen much of anything yet. Samus: Yes.02/26/2015 - 9:07pm
ZippyDSMleeWould you call the new tomb raider objectified? WOuld Samus Aran from the new Smash bros be objectified?02/26/2015 - 9:02pm
WonderkarpI'm hoping they put the rest of the comic book ghostbusters in there. Ortiz and Rookie(From GB the game)02/26/2015 - 8:38pm
Wonderkarpghostbusters board game is doing great. getting close too a 3rd extra playable Character. Ron Alexander.02/26/2015 - 8:37pm
Andrew EisenSmurfette is not subjective. If there's more than one female character, it's not Smurfette. Anyway, as with everything on the list, Smurfette is, in and of itself, not necessarily a bad thing.02/26/2015 - 8:32pm
Andrew EisenI think there's 5 women (out of 15, I think) but other than one being a bit more "hippy" than the others, they pretty much all have the same body type. Especially when compaired to the huge variety of male body types.02/26/2015 - 8:31pm
Wonderkarpso I dont see Smurfette as a bad thing. Unless like all your female characters are Smurfette. remember the Smurfs also had Sassette02/26/2015 - 8:29pm
E. Zachary KnightOne good example of the larger issues is one Anita used in the presentation, Blizzard's Overwatch game. There are a dozen men in the game with a dozen body types. But there are only 4 women with 2 body types, but 3 of them have the same one.02/26/2015 - 8:28pm
Wonderkarpthe smurfette thing is subjective to how many female characters you have. Take Sonic for example. You have Amy, who is obvious smurfette, but there's several other female characters now without that. Including the original animated seriescomics with Sally02/26/2015 - 8:28pm
E. Zachary KnightAE. Very true. I think that is where I was going, but it didn't come out right. Jack Harkness is sexy but not objectified. Whereas, a women would have to be objectified in order to be "sexy" in most games.02/26/2015 - 8:26pm
E. Zachary KnightAnd as Andrew pointed out, there is a big difference between a sexualized man, and an idealized man. But for some reason, there is no distinction between women in games. For the most part.02/26/2015 - 8:25pm
Andrew EisenI think one of the issues we run into repeatedly with these conversations is the confusion over "sexy" and "sexually objectified."02/26/2015 - 8:24pm
E. Zachary KnightYet, for some reason, in orde rto have a sexualized women, she must be wearing lingerie or a bikini. Can't women be sexual and still dress for the job at hand?02/26/2015 - 8:24pm
E. Zachary KnightThe problem I have with complaints of "sexualized men" is that men don't have to wear speedos to be sexualized. Captain Jack Harkness from Torchwood/Doctor Who, was one sexy man, but he spent 99% of his time in a WW2 soldier's trenchcoat.02/26/2015 - 8:23pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician