Lawmakers Urge FCC to Move Forward on Net Neutrality

August 17, 2010 -

Four lawmakers have written to the Federal Communications Commission this week urging it to act on the issue of net neutrality regulation - inspired by Google's and Verizon's proposal last week. All four are Democrats who serve on the House Energy and Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and the Internet. The group wrote to the FCC asking it to "take action to preserve the free, open nature of the Internet".

The letter goes on to point out that the Google-Verizon proposal might make "certain Internet content" "prioritized," which they say is a grave threat to the "principles of net neutrality." The group, lead by Ed Markey (D - MA), includes Anna Eshoo (D - CA), Mike Doyle (D - PA), and Jay Inslee (D - WA).

Full statements below:

Rep. Markey said: "No private interest should be permitted to carve up the Internet to suit its own purposes. The open Internet has been an innovation engine that has helped power our economy, and fiber-optic fast lanes or tiers that slow down certain content would dim the future of the Internet to the detriment of consumers, competition, job creation and the free-flow of ideas. In our letter, we express our strong support for Chariman Genachowski’s 'Third Way' proposal to bring the benefits of broadband to all Americans and encourage the FCC to move forward to preserve the free, open nature of the Internet."

Rep. Eshoo said: "In my Silicon Valley district there are people building the next generation of internet breakthroughs. We cannot undermine their success by 'cable-izing' the Internet. That’s why my colleagues and I remain steadfast in our commitment to net neutrality. The reactions to the legislative proposal from Google and Verizon demonstrate that it is not nearly strong enough to meet this standard. This letter is a clear statement of the principles that we believe are necessary to preserve openness on the Internet to allow the kind of innovation and growth that is the hallmark of today’s Internet. I remain optimistic that Chairman Genachowski will be able to find a path forward that honors these principles."

Rep. Inslee said: "Americans online experience shouldn't be dictated by corporate CEO's. Innovation and creativity online have given rise to millions of jobs and tremendous economic growth, in large part because individual consumers have been free to access what they want. The principles we have set forth in this letter coincide with that fact. Net neutrality is not about imposing a new set of rules, net neutrality is about preserving the open Internet and empowering consumers and small businesses to bring the next generation of entrepreneurial drive to the world wide web."

Rep. Doyle said: "The power of the Internet comes from the ability of everyone to find anything anywhere – or to put anything on it for the world to see. The internet’s value comes from the fact that it’s not like any other communications platform before it. I am concerned that the proposal put forward by Google and Verizon could have the effect of choking off much of the most important, creative, and valuable contributions the Internet can make to the idea-driven economy of the 21st century. At a time when research shows that low-income Americans are the fastest-growing users of the mobile web, it would be short-sighted to wall-off those users from the open internet and all of its benefits. My constituents know the benefit of an open Internet and they’ve urged me to press the FCC to address this issue quickly. That’s why I signed this letter to the Chairman Genachowski urging him to continue to work to preserve those essential qualities of the Internet."

Source: markey.house.gov


Comments

Re: Lawmakers Urge FCC to Move Forward on Net Neutrality

Well, gee...  Maybe next time Obama wants to do something, y'all shouldn't FIGHT HIM ON IT!!!  Seriously!  Everyone's whining that he doesn't do anything, but whenever he tries, everybody fights him on it!  What is the bloody problem with America?!  No wonder we're so messed up!

Re: Lawmakers Urge FCC to Move Forward on Net Neutrality

They want Obama to fail, hwoever then the GOP is in office they don't do shit.

Re: Lawmakers Urge FCC to Move Forward on Net Neutrality

Yes they do! They give big business and the wealthy tax breaks (to stimulate the economy - Regonomics - "Trickledown" - or, as Bush Sr. called it, "Voodoo Economics"). Oh, and invade other countries. Of course, that's just *my* opinion.

Democrats, on the other hand, they just waffle.

But when you get butt-hurt Republicans and waffling Democrats together? THEN you get a *real* doozy! One side doing everything they can to make the other side fail - even if it hurts the country - because, well...Democrats are in power and we can't have THEM seen as accomplishing anything good. And the other side? They get all weak-kneed and whiney about how the other side won't play with them. Instead of just realizing it's a lost cause and actually growing a pair. *sigh*

Re: Lawmakers Urge FCC to Move Forward on Net Neutrality

I DISAGREE!

Unless, you know, you don't like that, in which case I'm willing to reconsider.

Re: Lawmakers Urge FCC to Move Forward on Net Neutrality

Wait a sec.

First we have lawmakers whining because the FCC wants to do something, and that it should be up to lawmakers instead.

Then we have lawmakers demanding the FCC do something rather than, gasp, legislate.

Four more idiots that need to be voted out of office for not bothering to do their jobs.

Re: Lawmakers Urge FCC to Move Forward on Net Neutrality

They've been trying to legislate net neutrality for years -- remember the "series of tubes" speech?  Yeah, the guy who made that has been out of office for 2 years and died last week; that's how long this has been deadlocked.

I favor a legislative solution, too -- and, for that matter, a Democratic Party that can actually GET SHIT DONE -- but it's a little more complicated than "Why don't they just make a law?"

Re: Lawmakers Urge FCC to Move Forward on Net Neutrality

They can't get anything done with all the people saying no no no no.

Re: Lawmakers Urge FCC to Move Forward on Net Neutrality

Well, my Ted Stevens reference notwithstanding, this article isn't about the Senate, it's about the House, where there's no filibuster.  If the Democrats can't pass net neutrality in the House, it's because other Democrats are voting against it. 

But since you mention the Republican obstructionism in the Senate?  The GOP never had a 58-seat majority during the Bush Administration; that didn't seem to stop THEM from getting THEIR agenda passed.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Who's responsible for crappy Netflix performance on Verizon?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteThis whole Twitch thing just reeks of Google saying "You thought you could get away from us and our policies. That's adorable."07/25/2014 - 2:52pm
Sleaker@james_fudge - hopefully that's the case, but I wont hold my breath for it to happen.07/25/2014 - 1:08pm
SleakerUpdate on crytek situation is a bit ambiguous, but I'm glad they finally said something: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2014-07-25-crytek-addresses-financial-situation07/25/2014 - 1:07pm
E. Zachary KnightMan Atlas, Why do you not want me to have any money? Why? http://www.atlus.com/tears2/07/25/2014 - 12:06pm
Matthew WilsonI agree with that07/25/2014 - 10:45am
james_fudgeI think Twitch will have more of an impact on how YouTube/Google Plus work than the other way around.07/25/2014 - 10:22am
IanCWelp, twitch is going to suck now. Thanks google.07/25/2014 - 6:30am
Sleaker@MP - Looked up hitbox, thanks.07/24/2014 - 9:40pm
Matthew WilsonI agree, but to me given other known alternatives google seems to the the best option.07/24/2014 - 6:30pm
Andrew EisenTo be clear, I have no problem with Google buying it, I'm just concerned it will make a slew of objectively, quantifiably bad changes to Twitch just as it's done with YouTube over the years.07/24/2014 - 6:28pm
Matthew WilsonI doubt yahoo has the resources to pull it off, and I not just talking about money.07/24/2014 - 6:15pm
SleakerI wouldn't have minded a Yahoo purchase, probably would have been a better deal than Tumblr seeing as they paid the same for it...07/24/2014 - 6:13pm
MaskedPixelanteIt's the golden age of Hitbox, I guess.07/24/2014 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilsonagain twitch was going to get bought. It was just who was going to buy it . Twitch was not even being able to handle the demand, so hey needed a company with allot of infrastructure to help them. I can understand why you would not want Google to buy it .07/24/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew Eisen"Google is better than MS or Amazon" Wow. Google, as I mentioned earlier, progressively makes almost everything worse and yet there are still two lesser options. Again, wow!07/24/2014 - 5:43pm
Andrew EisenI don't know. MS, in my experience, is about 50/50 on its products. It's either fine or it's unusable crap. Amazon, well... I've never had a problem buying anything from them but I don't use any of their products or services so I couldn't really say.07/24/2014 - 5:42pm
Matthew WilsonGoogle is better than MS or Amazon.07/24/2014 - 5:33pm
Sleaker@AE - I've never seen youtube as a great portal to interact with people from a comment perspective. like ever. The whole interface doesn't really promote that.07/24/2014 - 5:28pm
Andrew EisenNor I. From a content producer's perspective, almost every change Google implements makes the service more cumbersome to use. It's why I set up a Facebook fan page in the first place; it was becoming too difficult to connect with my viewers on YouTube.07/24/2014 - 4:50pm
Sleakerwonder if anyone is going to try and compete with google, I'm not a huge fan of the way they manage their video services.07/24/2014 - 4:41pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician