Xbox Murderer Gets Two Life Sentences

September 11, 2010 -

El Paso County, Colorado Fourth Judicial District Judge Deborah Grohs sentenced 23-year-old Derek Lee Hernandez to two mandatory life sentences in prison (without parole) Friday for the January 2009 murder of 22-year-old Jason Holley. The judge issued the sentence -- including 32-years for the robbery -- along with a strong rebuke to the convicted murderer of the mentally disabled man.

A jury (six men, six women) spent nine hours over a two day period to find Hernandez guilty on all counts including first-degree murder, conspiracy, aggravated robbery and robbery from an at-risk adult in the January 5, 2009, slaying of Jason Holley.

Detectives found Holley’s partially nude remains four months after the murder when Kyle Stott led them to a ravine on May 8, 2009. According to prosecutors, Holley was nearly beheaded with a double-edged blade in January 2009, to cover up the theft of his Xbox 360 by the defendants.

During sentencing, Judge Grohs described the murder as a senseless crime and that the victim would have given Hernandez the Xbox 360 if he had asked for it.

"He [Holley] wanted to be your friend Mr. Hernandez. He would have done whatever you asked him and you took advantage of that," Judge Grohs told the defendant during sentencing. "You tricked him into coming up to the mountains and there was no reason other than to take his life."

Stott, the co-defendant in the case, was convicted of first-degree murder earlier this year.

Source: www.gazette.com

Posted in

Comments

Re: Xbox Murderer Sentenced to Two Life Sentences

How could they give someone 2 life sentence? Wouldn't just 1 life sentence do the job?

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Xbox Murderer Sentenced to Two Life Sentences

It's quite obvious, 2x life sentences means tax payers have to pay twice as much to keep him in prison.

Re: Xbox Murderer Sentenced to Two Life Sentences

In some places where they have parole sentencing someone to an extremely long sentence also makes sure they never get out that way.

For example, in some places you automatically become eligible for a parole after serving a set percentage of your sentence (i.e. 50%) or in the case of life you become eligible after a set number of years (usually 25).

But if you sentence someone to a long enough period you can ensure that they never get out. Like if you sentence someone to 200 years, it seems to make no sense, but if they're automatically parole eligible at the 50% mark that means they HAVE to serve at least 100 years. Which means they never get out.

Re: Xbox Murderer Sentenced to Two Life Sentences

That wouldn't apply here, since the judge issued each life sentence without the possibility for parole.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Xbox Murderer Sentenced to Two Life Sentences

In case of zombification.

Actually, he gets two life sentences without parole because, as jedi stated, there were two seperate charges for two seperate killings. In case he manages to appeal one charge or get it lowered, he still has another one he has to defeat making it extremely, extremely unlikely that he will not have to serve the complete sentence.

"

Re: Xbox Murderer Sentenced to Two Life Sentences

And then, on top of THAT, he's got another 32 years for robbery.

Basically, no matter what happens, this guy is getting no more than one hour of sunlight per day for the rest of his life.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Xbox Murderer Sentenced to Two Life Sentences

It's for the best. There was never any need to kill the man.

Re: Xbox Murderer Sentenced to Two Life Sentences

What all was he convicted of?  If he was convicted of two separate charges, each getting a life sentence, he'd get two life sentences.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
james_fudgewelcome to 2014 politics. Increasingly fought online10/20/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightIt is honestly a shame that anyone has to publicly state they are against such vile behavior, but that is the sad life we live.10/20/2014 - 1:46pm
E. Zachary KnightDecided to publicly reiterate my opposition to harassment campaigns. http://randomtower.com/2014/10/just-stop-with-the-harassment-and-bullying-campaigns-already/10/20/2014 - 1:45pm
Andrew EisenMichael Chandra - Unless I overlooked it, we haven't seen how the directive to not talk about whatever he wasn't supposed to talk about was phrased so it’s hard to say if it could have been misconstrued as a suggestion or not.10/20/2014 - 12:35pm
Andrew EisenHey, the second to last link is the relevant one! He actually did say "let them suffer." Although, he didn't say it to the other person he was bickering with.10/20/2014 - 12:29pm
Neo_DrKefkahttps://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/SxFas https://archive.today/1upoI https://archive.today/0hu7i https://archive.today/NsPUC https://archive.today/fLTQv https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenNeo_DrKefka - "Attacking"? Interesting choice of words. Also interesting that you quoted something that wasn't actually said. Leaving out a relevant link, are you?10/20/2014 - 11:04am
quiknkoldugh. I want to know why the hell Mozerella Sticks are 4 dollars at my works cafeteria...are they cooked in Truffle Oil?10/20/2014 - 10:41am
Neo_DrKefkaAnti-Gamergate supporter Robert Caruso attacks female GamerGate supporter by also attacking another cause she support which is the situation happening in Syia “LET SYRIANS SUFFER” https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 10:18am
Neo_DrKefkaThat is correct in an At-Will state you or the employer can part ways at any time. However Florida also has laws on the books about "Wrongful combinations against workers" http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/448.04510/20/2014 - 10:07am
james_fudgehe'd die if he couldn't talk about Wii U :)10/20/2014 - 9:16am
Michael ChandraBy the way, I am not saying Andrew should stop talking about Wii-U. I find it quite nice. :)10/20/2014 - 8:53am
Michael Chandra'How dare he ignore my wishes and my advice! I am his boss! I could have ordered him but I should be able to say it's advice rather than ordering him directly!'10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP goes "EZK, do not talk about X publicly for a week, we're preparing a big article on it" and he still tweets about X, they'd have a legitimate reason to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP tells Andrew "we'd kinda prefer it if you stopped talking about Wii-U for 1 week" and he'd tweet about it anyway, firing him for it would be idiotic.10/20/2014 - 8:51am
Michael ChandraLegal right, sure. But that doesn't make it any less pathetic of an excuse.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
ZippyDSMleeYou mean right to fire states.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
james_fudgesome states have "at will" employee laws10/20/2014 - 7:50am
quiknkoldIt says in the article that being in florida, you can get fired regardless if its a fireable offence10/20/2014 - 7:19am
Michael ChandraIf your employee respectfully disagrees with your advice, that's not a fireable offense. If they ignore your order, THEN you have the right to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 6:49am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician