Game Industry Briefs Offer Three Times More Support - Updated

September 17, 2010 -

Update: id Software has filed an amicus brief (PDF) and the Salt Lake Tribune reports that Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff has joined  nine other states that are asking the Supreme Court to strike down the California law. Thanks to all our Shoutbox users (PHX Corp, BearDogg-X, etc.,) for their help today.

Original story: Those supporting the state of California’s attempt to legislate the sale of violent video games to minors got an early start and submitted their amicus briefs on July 19th. Perhaps a bit disconcerting for gamers, those briefs sat unopposed for nearly two months.

But hey, better late than never as today the video game industry saw a flurry of support from all over the country as various people and organizations rushed to meet today’s submission deadline. We’re still waiting for the ECA’s long expected amicus brief but in the meantime, let’s tally up the scores and see which side can brag the most support.

In the red corner, showing their support for the state of California (boo!) are a respectable four briefs from 16 different people and organizations:

-California State Senator Leland Yee, Ph.D, The California Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the California Psychological Association (PDF)

-Common Sense Media (PDF)

-Eagle Forum (PDF)

-Attorneys general of Louisiana, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Texas And Virginia PDF)

And in the blue corner, showing their support for the video game industry (yay!) are 11 briefs representing a whopping 50 different people and organizations:

-Motion Picture Association of America, Independent Film and Television Alliance, Lucasfilm, National Association of Theatre Owners, Directors Guild of America, Producers Guild of America, Screen Actors Guild, Writers Guild of America West, and American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. (PDF)

-Comic Book Legal Defense Fund (PDF)

-Media Coalition members American Booksellers Foundation For Free Expression, Association Of American Publishers, Freedom To Read Foundation, National Association Of Recording Merchandisers, Recording Industry Association Of America. Joined by Amusement & Music Operators Association, Association Of National Advertisers, Pen Center USA, And The Recording Academy (PDF)

-International Game Developers Association and Academy of Interactive Arts and Sciences (PDF)

-The American Civil Liberties Union, The National Coalition Against Censorship, and The National Youth Rights Association (PDF)

-Progress & Freedom Foundation and The Electronic Frontier Foundation (PDF)

-Cato Institute (PDF)

-Computer & Communications Industry Association, Consumer Electronics Association, Information Technology Industry Council, Techamerica, Center For Democracy & Technology, and The Digital Liberty Project Of Americans For Tax Reform (PDF)

-The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, The American Society of News Editors, the First Amendment Project, The National Press Photographers Association, The Radio Television Digital News Association, The Society of Professional Journalists, and Student Press Law Center (PDF)

-First Amendment Scholars - Professors David Cole, Kenneth L. Karst, David G. Post, Martin H. Redish, William W. Van Alstyne, Jonathan D. Varat and Adam Winkler. (PDF)

-Marion B. Brechner First Amendment Project and Pennsylvania Center For the First Amendment (PDF)

Of course, as impressive as this support is, it all comes down to what the Supreme Court thinks. Oral arguments will be heard Nov. 2nd. Stay tuned...

Much thanks to Media Coalition for all the PDFs.

[GamePolitics is a publication of the ECA.]

-Reporting from San Diego, GamePolitics Special Correspondent Andrew Eisen

 


Comments

Re: Game Industry Briefs Offer Three Times More Support - ...

They can say the chilling cause affect. Where stores stop selling the games because of the government rating and developrs have to censor their games to get them on shelves.

Re: Game Industry Briefs Offer Three Times More Support - ...

But if you think about it, this issue really isn't up for a vote, so the amount of support is a moot point. What matters is the points they make and if they are valid, or at least seem valid.

I haven't read the briefs, and let's face it, I probably won't. If it was fun to read legal briefs, then lawyers wouldn't be paid so much. But from what other people are saying, the laws support focuses on "parents want it", "it's common sense", and "think of the children." However, it isn't the courts job to allow or disallow based on what people want. I'd figure that the anti-law group is focusing on "1st amendment" and "no law means no law."

I really think that this should be a slam dunk for the anti-law group. The long and short of it is that it's against the Constitution. The law group is pretty much saying "but we really want this law." The objection was "You can't cause it's unconstitutional." They haven't come up with a reason yet that would make it constitutional. Unless someone really drops the ball, it should be an easy A.

Re: Game Industry Briefs Offer Three Times More Support - ...

Actually, the brief from the games industry was very interesting reading - skipping past the legal pages, there's a well argued position that every new medium (from comics to music to movies) has faced clampdowns from moral panicking paranoid authorities. Look it up on GP, I recommend it.

Re: Game Industry Briefs Offer Three Times More Support

Just looking at the weight carried by the (authors?) of the breifs...  Looks like things are stacked heavly in the Game Industry's favor.  I don't know why but I am really glad to see the MPAA getting behind this.  Maybe they fear that if the California law is upheld they may see themselves in the hot seat soon after.

Re: Game Industry Briefs Offer Three Times More Support

Witty headline, Mr. Eisen.

Re: Game Industry Briefs Offer Three Times More Support

How much longer Until the ECA files it's brief(Just asking, k)

Besides  We may win this because of the precendent here in the Circuit court and the arguments for our side(including Amcius briefs such as MPAA , Media Collition)

Watching JT on GP is just like watching an episode of Jerry springer only as funny as the fights

America has just became its own version of the Jerry Springer Show after a bizarre moment in Florida involving a carnival worker.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
Matthew WilsonSF have to build upwards they have natural growth limits. they can not grow outwards. ps growing outwards is terable just look at Orlando or Austin for that.04/16/2014 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeIf they built upward then it would becoem like every other place making it worthless, if they don't build upward they will price people out making it worthless, what they need to do is a mix of things not just one exstreme or another.04/16/2014 - 4:00pm
Matthew Wilsonyou know the problem in SF was not the free market going wrong right? it was government distortion. by not allowing tall buildings to be build they limited supply. that is not free market.04/16/2014 - 3:48pm
ZippyDSMleeOh gaaa the free market is a lie as its currently leading them to no one living there becuse they can not afford it makign it worthless.04/16/2014 - 3:24pm
Matthew WilsonIf you have not read http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/introducing-steam-gauge-ars-reveals-steams-most-popular-games/ you should. It is a bit stats heavy, but worth the read.04/16/2014 - 2:04pm
Matthew Wilsonthe issue is when is doesn't work it can screw over millions in new york city's case. more often than not it is better to let the free market run its course without market distortion.04/16/2014 - 9:36am
NeenekoTrue, and overdone stagnation is a problem. It is a tricky balance. It does not help that when it does work, no one notices. Most people here have benifited from rent controls and not even realized it.04/16/2014 - 9:23am
ZippyDSMleehttp://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2014/04/15/riaa_files_civil_suit_against_megaupload04/16/2014 - 8:48am
ZippyDSMleeEither way you get stagnation as people can not afford the prices they set.04/16/2014 - 8:47am
Neenekowell, specifically it helps people already living there and hurts people who want to live there instead. As for 'way more hurt', majorities generally need less legal protection. yes it hurt more people then it helped, it was written for a minority04/16/2014 - 8:30am
MaskedPixelantehttp://torrentfreak.com/square-enix-drm-boosts-profits-and-its-here-to-stay-140415/ Square proves how incredibly out of touch they are by saying that DRM is the way of the future, and is here to stay.04/16/2014 - 8:29am
james_fudgeUnwinnable Weekly Telethon playing Metal Gear http://www.twitch.tv/rainydayletsplay04/16/2014 - 8:06am
ConsterTo be fair, there's so little left of the middle class that those numbers are skewing.04/16/2014 - 7:42am
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician