GOG.com's Awkward Apology

September 22, 2010 -

Good Old Games sure pulled a fast one on journalists and all of its members. While the publicity stunt - that they were shutting gog.com down because it couldn’t go on the way it was - was clever and generated a lot buzz, I wonder if there will be some ill feelings from subscribers who were saddened and scared at the prospect of losing all their games.. You can watch the awkward video the site's owners posted today.

The silver lining - if there is one here - is that when the site re-launches on Thursday it will be vastly improved, and Baldur's Gate will soon be available for sale DRM-free. That's something.


Comments

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

I wish them the best. GoG is a great service. I still hope it is acquired by Amazon but otherwise it rocks!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The most difficult pain a man can suffer is to have knowledge of much and power over little" - Herodotus

you hope it is aquired by

you hope it is aquired by amazon? commercialized, hiked pricing, over populated, and eventually losing licenses faster than it'll gain'em?

 

tbh only used amazon once, and its so over commercialized i can't find anything i actually want from them, not to mention it took 6 months just to get my stuff shipped, forbid they even tell me theres a holdup without a chain of phone calls and e-mails.

tbh i'm more afraid they'd make it subscription based and allow DRM.

 

tis my experience anyways :)

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

This marketing stunt was inexcusably stupid. I'm only willing to overlook it this time because the service has been excellent, and they realized that, yes, what they did was colossaly ill-advised. Yes, you can joke with your fans and have fun with them, but faking your own death is not a joke. It's just a gigantic dick move.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

There new website design is better be worth it with the stunt they pulled.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

looks the same to me tbh..

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

wasn't the old GoG openly referred to as "beta" anyways?

on one hand i was irked at the risk i'd lose my stuff, on the other things didn't add up to the story being right because of the beta bit and sales/newsletter info that was posted barely a day before the supposed death of the site.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Eh, I admit I fell for it, but I have no ill will toward them.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

You know, might not have been the best way to handle this, but to be honest, Thats fine, Im not sore about it cause GOG gave me the change to get my hands on some classics that I still loved.

Any group that gave me the change to get Freespace 2 again, has my support.

Now if they could get Mechwarrior 2 and One must Fall 2097, I'd be a fan for life!

 

"My name is Lenerd Church, and you will fear my LASER FACE"

"My name is Lenerd Church, and you will fear my LASER FACE"

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Well, they would have needed to take the site down for massive maintenance anyway, so they may as well be theatrical about it. Now, this was the STUPIDEST way be theatrical, and it's making people face the fact that digital distribution has a lifespan, but I can't blame them for trying.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

---You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

I'm confused by this whole thing because I went to gog.com yesterday, when the update was there and I would have sworn (and I wish someone had a screenshot of the page, with updates, from yesterday as proof) that they DID say that, at some point, gog.com WOULD be coming back, different, but coming back.  I know they said a longer explaination would be coming on Wednesday, and that by Thursday you would have access to your games.  But I'm sure the message also said that gog.com would change and come back different, though they didn't say when.

Anyone have the screenshot with the last update from yesterday?

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Yeah, the first message, the first paragraph:

"We have recently had to give serious thought to whether we could really keep GOG.com the way it is. We've debated on it for quite some time and, unfortunately, we've decided that GOG.com simply cannot remain in its current form. "

"... keep GOG.com the way it is."  "... cannot remain in its current form."

To me, that wasn't saying they were closing and not returning but rather a change was coming.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

To me it suggested a large change (not a minor one as happened) .The whole episode has put me off using GOGs removing services promised (the redownloading of games) as a marketing stunt just rubs me the wrong way. It does not matter how short the time was, or how big the hints were they still took away services to save a few pounds on marketing.

That is not to say I will never use them, but they would not be my first choice.

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin

--
A house is not a home unless it contains food and fire for the mind as well as the body. Benjamin Franklin

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

To me, the video comes off as less of an apology and more of an admonition to users who didn't realize it was a joke.  After all, there were "plenty of hints."

Classy, guys.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Yeah, kinda dumb.  But not entirely unexpected, as I saw people in the comments section here say they thought it was a hoax.

Still -- kinda dumb.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Yeah there were plenty of hints, like the gog.com newsletters showing up in my inbox announcing new games available on their service during this whole stunt.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

I didn't get one so I have to assume I'm not alone on that front.  But it doesn't matter, whatever you think of this stunt in the first place, making fun of those that obviously have a lot of love for the service and care deeply about it continuing is not, by my estimation, a very wise choice.  It just doesn't strike me as good business sense to patronize those that patronize you.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

Oh I didn't intend for my statement to be a shot at others at all and I apologize if it came across that way.  I thought you meant you had gotten "plenty of hints" :P I remember seeing the message on gog.com on sunday then a newsletter popped into my inbox on monday advertising some games on sale.

Re: GOG.com's Awkward Apology

...
I can forgive them. Fact is, I'm not sore about this at all. :D

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Who's responsible for crappy Netflix performance on Verizon?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteThis whole Twitch thing just reeks of Google saying "You thought you could get away from us and our policies. That's adorable."07/25/2014 - 2:52pm
Sleaker@james_fudge - hopefully that's the case, but I wont hold my breath for it to happen.07/25/2014 - 1:08pm
SleakerUpdate on crytek situation is a bit ambiguous, but I'm glad they finally said something: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2014-07-25-crytek-addresses-financial-situation07/25/2014 - 1:07pm
E. Zachary KnightMan Atlas, Why do you not want me to have any money? Why? http://www.atlus.com/tears2/07/25/2014 - 12:06pm
Matthew WilsonI agree with that07/25/2014 - 10:45am
james_fudgeI think Twitch will have more of an impact on how YouTube/Google Plus work than the other way around.07/25/2014 - 10:22am
IanCWelp, twitch is going to suck now. Thanks google.07/25/2014 - 6:30am
Sleaker@MP - Looked up hitbox, thanks.07/24/2014 - 9:40pm
Matthew WilsonI agree, but to me given other known alternatives google seems to the the best option.07/24/2014 - 6:30pm
Andrew EisenTo be clear, I have no problem with Google buying it, I'm just concerned it will make a slew of objectively, quantifiably bad changes to Twitch just as it's done with YouTube over the years.07/24/2014 - 6:28pm
Matthew WilsonI doubt yahoo has the resources to pull it off, and I not just talking about money.07/24/2014 - 6:15pm
SleakerI wouldn't have minded a Yahoo purchase, probably would have been a better deal than Tumblr seeing as they paid the same for it...07/24/2014 - 6:13pm
MaskedPixelanteIt's the golden age of Hitbox, I guess.07/24/2014 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilsonagain twitch was going to get bought. It was just who was going to buy it . Twitch was not even being able to handle the demand, so hey needed a company with allot of infrastructure to help them. I can understand why you would not want Google to buy it .07/24/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew Eisen"Google is better than MS or Amazon" Wow. Google, as I mentioned earlier, progressively makes almost everything worse and yet there are still two lesser options. Again, wow!07/24/2014 - 5:43pm
Andrew EisenI don't know. MS, in my experience, is about 50/50 on its products. It's either fine or it's unusable crap. Amazon, well... I've never had a problem buying anything from them but I don't use any of their products or services so I couldn't really say.07/24/2014 - 5:42pm
Matthew WilsonGoogle is better than MS or Amazon.07/24/2014 - 5:33pm
Sleaker@AE - I've never seen youtube as a great portal to interact with people from a comment perspective. like ever. The whole interface doesn't really promote that.07/24/2014 - 5:28pm
Andrew EisenNor I. From a content producer's perspective, almost every change Google implements makes the service more cumbersome to use. It's why I set up a Facebook fan page in the first place; it was becoming too difficult to connect with my viewers on YouTube.07/24/2014 - 4:50pm
Sleakerwonder if anyone is going to try and compete with google, I'm not a huge fan of the way they manage their video services.07/24/2014 - 4:41pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician