EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

October 1, 2010 -

Did not see this one coming, but via Kotaku (thanks Cheater87!), Electronic Arts has folded like a cheap suit and announced that it is renaming the Taliban forces in its upcoming Medal of Honor game to the more benign “Opposing Force.”

To be fair, Medal of Honor Greg Goodrich, in a statement on the game’s website, indicated that the renaming was done in response to “reverence for American and Allied soldiers.”

More from Goodrich:

… we have also received feedback from friends and families of fallen soldiers who have expressed concern over the inclusion of the Taliban in the multiplayer portion of our game. This is a very important voice to the Medal of Honor team. This is a voice that has earned the right to be listened to. It is a voice that we care deeply about. Because of this, and because the heartbeat of Medal of Honor has always resided in the reverence for American and Allied soldiers, we have decided to rename the opposing team in Medal of Honor multiplayer from Taliban to Opposing Force.

The change “should not directly affect gamers,” wrote Goodrich, who added that “this franchise will never willfully disrespect, intentionally or otherwise, your memory and service.”

Quite an about-face from August, when EA Games President Frank Gibeau said that the company would not give in to critics seeking to “compromise our creative vision and what we want to do.”

The inclusion and ability to play as the Taliban in Medal of Honor’s multiplayer mode drew fire from the UK’s Defense Secretary, and the Defense Ministers of Canada, New Zealand and the Netherlands. It also resulted in the game being banned from GameStop stores located on U.S. military bases.

Comments

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Oh no, a game about a modern war has the taliban in it! GET THE TORCHES!

All this fear mongering about video games... it's sad that politicians actually do it on purpose to fuel the "FOR THE KIDS" mentality. What are they going to do next, tell us 3D TV is the new devil? "But it's so visceral, like you're right in the action! BAN IT"

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Freaking EA why did you have to compromise on this? There was little reason to give in and you should've stood your ground. Having the Taliban does not disrespect any Allied solier's memory, especially if you paint them in a bad light.

I trulyn hope this doesn't become a South Park like scenario where you have to cave into everyone making stupid demands to protect their sensitivites.

----------------------------------------------------

 Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

---------------------------------------------------- Debates are like merry go rounds. Two people take their positions then they go through the same points over and over and over again. Then when it's over they have the same positions they started in.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

This is sad. Nobody gives a crap when you're playing as a Nazi in a World War II game. The enemy is the enemy depending which theatre of war you're fighting in. If you're going to change that, just go ahead and eliminate multiplayer all together. 

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

I recall SOCOM Combined Assualt suddenly changing the name "Terrorists" to some other name, and I know for a fact that the previous 3 titles had always had Terrorists as one side to play on (other was seals).  I didn't see a problem with it at all, no matter how close to home it may have been.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

With the change of one word you would've thought that EA removed entire levels or stopped the game completely judging by the reaction. The word change doesn't change the game or the experience.

Quite frankly this whole mess could've been avoided initially if EA didn't bother explicitly naming the Taliban in the game, although I do wonder whether it was intentional to cause controversy judging by the company's recent record (eg Dante's Inferno and Dead Space). They got their pre-order figures up and good publicity for launch so it appears that they don't have to use that one word in the game now.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Self censorship like this is nothing but subtle fasicsim....

/tinfoil hat


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

@Nightwing, you'd better. I want to be able to buy one of those shirts soon. :) Isn't there a modding community MoH (for almost every FPS for that matter)? Why not make a patch that fixes it? We should not allow the "roaches" to win so easily.

-------

"WARNING GUARANTEE: This post contains material which a truly free society would neither fear nor suppress."

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

I find this very cowardly of EA. I have wanted to play Medal of Honor games since the PSone game, but I haven't had the opportunity yet. Now that they are insulting my intelligence by catering to the whims of a group that doesn't even buy video games (honestly, every complaint over featuring "Taliban" in multiplayer is made by someone who is not a video game player) I cannot justify the purchase. EA has lost a lot of respect from me again. The first time was when they treated their developers and employees unfairly by screwing them out of overtime. They got the respect back by changing how they did things. Now that they're directly insulting the intelligence of their customers, I refuse to buy this product. I may consider other EA products, but even then I will be hesitant to purchase them.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Money trumps principles every time. Why do you think our political system is the morass it is?

Disappointing, EA. If you were going to cave on this, you should have done it immediately. Making it a stand for creative freedom, and then taking a dive just tanks your credibility, and the credibility of the industry with it.

Next time, when the industry is the middle of a big fight to be respected as a legitimate artform, and you happen to get the spotlight thrown on you, try not to look like tools.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

 Where does money play into this exactly? I mean i think i recent read that MoH was breaking pre-order sales records. The vast majority of people bitching about the game are people who would have never bought it in the first place. Hell frankly i would hope that we'd see a lot of canceled pre-orders from gamers who are irritated by EA caving to political pressure.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Whilst the people who criticised it never would've bought the game, I wonder how many people would've pre-ordered the game if it didn't generate this controversy?

This controversy helped generate sales, and EA have a track record of trying to create controversy to generate sales.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

EA should have never made the promise of never caving into the critics.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

EA should have never caved into the critics.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Imagination is a wonderful thing.  Thus far Anti-Human Rights supporters cannot arrest, put through trial, and convict anyone who imagines things that they don't like.

Psst!  Although I'm not interested in this genre, here's an idea:  When you play, and see the words "opposing force", mentally envision it saying "Taliban" instead.  So there!  :P

And, hey, actually TELL people that's what you do.  After all, just because you play one on TV, doesn't mean you ARE one in real life.

Edit:  Ya know what?  I actually like that last sentence.  Think I'll make some T-Shirts with it on them.  :)

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Someone once called me Taliban during a Counter Strike Source match.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

The Taliban, or, as they are to be referred to from here on in, They Who Must Not Be Named.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

So, how long before more demands are made. Perhaps the "Oposing force" won't even be made to look middle eastern, perhaps they won't be referred to as terrorists.

As I like to say, when changes like those occur due to fear, when the freedom of expression is curbed because another is offended..

*Counter Strike voice* Terrorists win.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Yeah, I think we all made the Counter-Strike reference when this story came out. :( Not that I'm a huge fan of these FPS games, but I'm all for freedom of speech.

300 Episodes and counting: http://www.orangeloungeradio.com/

400 Episodes, TEN YEARS and counting: http://www.orangeloungeradio.com/ | Voice of Geeks Network - http://www.vognetwork.com

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

If this pacifies the people opposed to this game, they are simply pathetic.  It's okay to have military games set in modern conflict, but actually identifying the opposing faction is insulting?  It's okay to demonize the enemy, but don't you dare actually portray them in equal lights to our own military forces.  Fuck all of you pathetic warmongering roaches.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

I doubt this is really going to placate anyone either, as those who are opposed to this game have already made their minds up.  If this was done just so it can be sold on military bases, I agree it is pandering as well as a shallow money-grab from EA to make sure they earn every last dollar (Which doesn't make sense, as any serviceman could simply go and buy the game off-base anyway if they really wanted to.  So the question of potentially lost sales is moot).  Still, I don't think that those who instituted that sales ban are going to be fooled by this, as all that was done is change the name when it's still clear who they're supposed to be.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

I, The Master of Saying It, couldn't have said it any better. It's pandering to this kind of xenophobia that got the United States and its allies between a rock and hard place and which'll keep them there.

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Shame on you EA.  Shame.

"… we have also received feedback from friends and families of fallen soldiers who have expressed concern over the inclusion of the Taliban in the multiplayer portion of our game. This is a very important voice to the Medal of Honor team."

More important than the voices of the people who were actually going to buy your game in the first place, huh?

And possible shame on you "friends and families of fallen soldiers who have expressed concern over the inclusion of the Taliban in the multiplayer portion of [MOH]."

All EA has done is rename the "Taliban" (which was called "insurgents" in all press materials I've seen) to "Opposing Force."  Does this truly mollify you?  Does this make it all okay?  Will gamers playing the same exact game with a different word used to describe the enemy help you sleep at night?

I hope not.  That would be truly pathetic.

Then again, so is raising a stink about something so innocuous in the first place.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: EA Caves, Renames Taliban in MOH

Quite an about-face from August, when EA Games President Frank Gibeau said that the company would not give in to critics seeking to “compromise our creative vision and what we want to do.”
 

This is maybe the saddest part. They made a promise and a few months later, they broke it. It´s very disappointing.

The great problem is that now on more and more people without any knowledge or respect for games will demand more and more censorship. And if big companies like EA (and Konami with their own game) are willing to accomplish those demands, it can´t be good for nobody.

Let´s see if in the few next months another company decides that censorship is more important than their "creative vision" or their own costumers.

Good job, EA, good job.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you feel about Amazon buying Twitch?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelantehttp://m.tickld.com/x/something-you-never-realized-about-guardians-of-the-galaxy Right in the feels.08/29/2014 - 6:56pm
AvalongodAgain I think we're conflating the issue of whether Sarkeesian's claims are beyond critique (no they're not) and whether its ever appropriate to use sexist language, let alone physical threats on a woman to intimidate her (no it isn't)08/29/2014 - 5:04pm
prh99Trolling her or trying to assail her integrity just draws more attention (Streisand effect?). Which is really not what the trolls want, so the only way to win (if there is a win to be had) is not to play/troll.08/29/2014 - 5:02pm
prh99Who cares, just don't watch the damn videos if you don't like her. Personally, I don't care as far as she is concerned as long there are interesting games to be played.08/29/2014 - 4:34pm
Andrew EisenZip - And yet, you can't cite a single, solitary example. (And no one said you hated anyone. Along those lines, no one claimed Sarkeesian was perfect either.)08/29/2014 - 3:51pm
Andrew EisenSaint's Row: Gat Out of Hell was just announced for PC, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360 and Xbox One making it the 150th game For Everything But Wii U! Congratulations Deep Silver!08/29/2014 - 3:49pm
ZippyDSMleeI do not hate them jsut think its mostly hyperlobe.08/29/2014 - 3:40pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - I'd say that's likely. From my experience, most who have a problem with Sarkeesian's videos either want to hate them in the first place (for whatever reason) or honestly misunderstand what they're about and what they're saying.08/29/2014 - 3:16pm
james_fudgeWe appreciate your support :)08/29/2014 - 2:55pm
TechnogeekIt gives me hope that maybe, just maybe, the gaming community is not statistically indistinguishable from consisting entirely of people that your average Xbox Live caricature would look at and go "maybe you should tone it down a little bit".08/29/2014 - 2:49pm
TechnogeekI just want to say that while I've disagreed with the staff of this site on several occasions, it's still good to see that they're not automatically dismissing Anita's videos as a "misandrist scam" or whatever the preferred dismissive term is these days.08/29/2014 - 2:49pm
E. Zachary KnightZippy, So you can't find even one?08/29/2014 - 1:04pm
ZippyDSMleeAndrew Eisen:Right because shes prefect and never exaggerates... *rolls eyes*08/29/2014 - 12:53pm
SleakerAnd honestly, nearly all of the games she references, or images she depicts I've always cringed at and wondered why they were included in games to begin with, from pinups through explicit sexual depictions or direct abuse. I think it's cheap storytelling.08/29/2014 - 12:35pm
Sleaker@AE - aren't most people fundamentally misunderstanding her at this point? haha.. On a related note I think a lot of the backlash is coming from males that think she is telling them their 'Generic Male Fantasy' is bad and wrong.08/29/2014 - 12:33pm
Andrew EisenAnd no, I don't think the female community would be upset over the performance of a case study in and of itself. Possibly the mostivations behind such a study, the methodology or conclusions but not the mere idea of a case study.08/29/2014 - 12:29pm
Andrew EisenAmusingly, these videos aren't saying you can't/shouldn't use tropes or that sexual representations are inherently problematic so those are very silly things to have a problem with and indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of the series.08/29/2014 - 12:29pm
SleakerDo you think the female community would get extremely angry over a male doing a case study on the negative impact of sex-novels and their unrealistic depiction of males and how widespread they are in american culture?08/29/2014 - 12:25pm
SleakerThe other thing that people might find problematic is that they see no problem with sexual representations of females (or males) in games. And realistically, why is there anything wrong with sexual representations in fiction?08/29/2014 - 12:24pm
SleakerTo even discuss or bring up these issues at a cultural level to begin with. Going straight for games to many probably feels like a huge overstepping given that it's interactive story in many cases, and when you're telling a story why can't you use tropes.08/29/2014 - 12:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician