Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

October 4, 2010 -

Earlier this summer the UK’s Daily Star fabricated a story claiming that the next entry in Rockstar’s Grand Theft Auto series would be based on the July 2010 crime spree committed by ex-con Raoul Moat (pictured)across the NorthEast section of the UK and that the game would be named GTA Rothbury.

While the paper later apologized for the incident, and the piece’s author insulted gamers, calling them “grown (?!?) men who sit around all day playing computer games with one another,” the paper has been ordered to pay undisclosed damages to Rockstar and Take Two Interactive. According to the Guardian, Rockstar has accepted “substantial” libel damages as awarded by a High Court.

Rockstar’s Solicitor, Melanie Hart, stated, “The defendant now accepts that Rockstar Games never had any intention to create such a video game at any time. The story was entirely false.”

The Daily Mail’s parent company, Express Newspapers, was also ordered to pay Rockstar’s legal fees.

An Express Newspapers spokesperson said that the company “accepted that the allegations were untrue and apologised for the upset and damage caused.”

MCVUK still has a screenshot of the original Daily Star article available on its website.


Comments

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

It is good that the Daily Star has been effectively fined over this false story. They should check there facts. I personally would not like to see the original journalist handed the fine, as I do believe that the paper has to except responsibility as it decided to run with the story, but I do hope that his name is somewhat blackened.

He made up the story, but what was worse was that he was completely unrepentant over it, in journalism that is the worst thing you can do. The fact that he was so childish over the matter just showed what a hack he was. I hope all publications think twice before employing him or paying for his "stories".

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

Well, now I want a copy of Red Dead Redemption even more.

As for the author, well, I doubt he's an author with them any more.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

First off, yes, congratulations to Rockstar for finally defending itself.

Though, "The defendant now accepts that Rockstar Games never had any intention to create such a video game at any time. The story was entirely false.” Just now? I think they should give them some credit, the Daily Star did write a redaction and apology within a week:

http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/07/26/daily-star-apologizes-fabricating...

Overall I'm surprised at how well they've been dealing with this thing, other than publishing the thing in the first place. But that makes it all the more upsetting that the dumbass who actually wrote the story is seemingly getting off scot free. He should be fired and never be able to get a job in the industry again. This is disgraceful.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

I don't know about the Daily Star, but I if did something stupid that cost my company libel losses plus legal fees, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't even bother with cardboard boxes. They'd just roll my desk with all my stuff out the nearest window. And I'm on the second floor.

This guy being fired after this (if he hasn't already been) is almost a given. Companies just don't usually announce HR decisions like that, for CYA. As far as never getting another job in the industry... Nobody who actually looks at his background as an applicant is ever going to hire him as a writer. After the screaming liability of "I caused my company to lose a ton of money in a lawsuit," he'll probably have problems finding jobs in other, completely unrelated industries.

But, then again, that's what happens when you're an idiot.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

I think you overestimate the journalistic standards of the British press.  If he's fired (and even that's not a given), he'll find some other rag which will scold him and tell him to be more vague the next time he wants to make up a story.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

About damn time there were some consequences for all the cheap shots taken at us.

Here's to the rag known as the Daily Mail going down the tubes.

EDIT: Sorry, that's Daily Star, not "Mail". Though they are the same thing, really.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

I´m very glad they won. I hope this inspire many other companies that are being slandered by oportunistic pricks like the Daily Star.

I´m so buying a Rockstar game this week, lol (probably not).

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

It's Jerry Lawton who should have to pay this totally out of pocket.  Daily Star should have verified it, sure.  But Lawton was the individual who made the false claims.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

I don't know how the law goes in Britain, but in the US, that would qualify as a work of corporate authorship; Lawton may have technically written it, but for all legal purposes the publisher wrote it.

There could hypothetically be a clause in the contract saying the author has responsibility, but it would be simpler just to fire him.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

Personally, I would rather see the jerk who wrote the article lose his job. 

Now, if only the entire industry had half the stones R*/TT has, then perhaps they would be better suited to fight that California law.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

He cost the publication he works, or posibly worked for thousands, so he probably has lost his job.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

This kind of thing should be career/business ending.  I hope the damages were REALLY high.

------- Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

Moreover, even the Daily Star reproduced the press release published by The Guardian : http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/156810/Paper-sorry-for-Moat-game-c...

Meanwhile, Jerry Lawton tries and tries hard : http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/155632/Raoul-Moat-the-play-Lotto-f...

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

Finally, FINALLY, some game makers who have enough balls to defend their creation against libels all by THEMSELVES.

But what happened to the paper author ? Has he been sued too ? Because he would be the first one to deserve it.

Re: Rockstar Wins "GTA Rothbury" Libel Case

Congrats on winning the case Rockstar!

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
PHX Corphttp://www.polygon.com/2015/7/27/9050375/street-fighter-5-beta-offline-delayed Street Fighter 5 beta taken offline, now postponed indefinitely07/27/2015 - 9:51pm
Goth_Skunk@eZeek: Noooooooooo.... ;)07/27/2015 - 8:44pm
MechaTama31Re: Google+, wow. I never in a million years thought they would backpedal on that. I just resigned myself to not using commenting functions on any of their services.07/27/2015 - 6:21pm
E. Zachary KnightGoth, are you saying all women are fat. ;)07/27/2015 - 5:38pm
benohawkMake it more adorable and more gender neutral! Widescreen Dog and 16:9 their 16 kitten sidekicks07/27/2015 - 5:15pm
Goth_SkunkOr, if you prefer, Widescreen Woman.07/27/2015 - 4:12pm
Goth_SkunkWho will save us from this abominable practice?! Introducing WIDESCREEN MAN and his sidekick 16:9!07/27/2015 - 4:10pm
Andrew EisenInteresting coincidence. I tweeted about the evils of vertically oriented video just last night. https://twitter.com/AndrewEisen/status/62549836960397312007/27/2015 - 4:01pm
PHX Corphttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJ_I9-CkzDE The Great Atari Ransack (The Jimquisition) Warning Vertical video syndrome in one scene07/27/2015 - 3:40pm
MattsworknameBout time google07/27/2015 - 3:33pm
james_fudgeugh. TG man :)07/27/2015 - 1:15pm
MechaCrashGoogle drops Google+ requirements for YouTube and other services: http://venturebeat.com/2015/07/27/google-is-dropping-its-google-requirement-across-all-products-starting-with-youtube/07/27/2015 - 12:55pm
benohawkThat still isn't Steam pay royalties. At best it is Bethesda not being willing to relicense the music,07/27/2015 - 12:51pm
Infophile(cont'd) different service. This often happened with TV shows, where music was only licensed for broadcast, but not for DVD release. So for many older shows, they either have to relicense it or use different/no music for the DVD release.07/27/2015 - 12:36pm
Infophile@benohawk: It most likely comes down to the original licensing agreement for the music in it. Often those agreements only license it for the medium it first releases in, so it has to be re-licensed if it's rereleased in a different form or through a ...07/27/2015 - 12:35pm
benohawkWhy would steam be paying royalties on anything in quake?07/27/2015 - 12:01pm
black mantaI recommend using the KMQuake II patch which supports .ogg music files, then downloading the music from someplace, then dropping it in to a music folder into the \baseq2 directory.07/27/2015 - 10:32am
black mantaI got Quake 2 during the Steam Quakecon sale. Funny thing is, there's no music for it! Guess Steam didn't want to pay the royalty fees or something.07/27/2015 - 10:30am
black mantaLike EZK, I also have a backlog of games. Right now I'm playing Crysis 3 for the first time, and replaying Quake 2.07/27/2015 - 10:29am
E. Zachary KnightZippy, No. It is because I have a backlog of games a mile long and have not bought to many new games, which includes Mass Effect.07/27/2015 - 9:28am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician