Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

October 6, 2010 -

A Goldman Sachs analyst (whose company was saved by taxpayers, for the record - you're welcome) says that Microsoft should spin off its Xbox division and downgraded Microsoft share recommendations from buy to neutral. In a new report, Goldman Sachs said that "A break-up of the consumer businesses could potentially unlock hidden value, or more discipline on cost could turn the businesses into contributors to profitability and shareholder value."

Goldman Sachs: Microsoft should split off 'unprofitable' Xbox dept. Analyst Goldman Sachs has downgraded Microsoft share recommendations from 'buy' to 'neutral', and suggested that one way to resolve the firm's apparent difficulties is to split off its consumer entertainment division.

Goldman's Sarah Friar added that "The Xbox products could be an appealing stand-alone entity, given the historical success of the Xbox and the products' brand strength, and the business could show unlocked value with forced cost discipline compared to as a piece of Microsoft."

Other analysts strongly disagree with the assessment: "Pulling this off would be like Microsoft learning Geller-ian magic tricks, the equivalent of being able to bend spoons with its brain," said investor Paul Kedrosky.

Finally, analyst Matt Rosoff told ComputerWorld: "I think it's silly to spin off a profitable business. Xbox would lose more than it would gain by going it alone." Rosoff felt that the company would be better off carving its search business, due to the complexities of competing with Google.

Source: GI.biz

Posted in

Comments

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

Dude, James...sorry to be a downer, but you really need to proofread your posts.  You've got a typo in almost every sentence ("you're welcomed", "In a new report from Goldman Sachs said that", that entire weird second paragraph that restates what's said in the first paragraph in a run-on sentence, "Other analyst strongly disagree with the assessment").

It's a good story, but it looks like you were really in a hurry when you put it up.  Take a minute to check your work before you hit that Post button.

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

was supposed to be a reply...

 

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

LOLWUT  This "analyst" doesn't understand anything about Microsoft and Xbox.

Pwnage of Empires Xbox 360 Indie RTS

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

Yes, I'm sure one of the most successful companies in history is going to take the advice of one that had to be BAILED OUT BY TAXPAYERS!

Sorry, but that's just a LOT of fucking nerve right there. Jack Thompson-sized nerve, you know?

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

Yeah... I don't see it.

Spinning off would be a great way to make some bankers some money, but I can not picture how it would do anything positive for Microsoft.

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

100% accurate comment

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

Yes, let's listen to the people known for falsely raising the value of their own stock.  Sure, Microsoft could probably burn their reputation into the ground and make a few bucks.  But who will bail them out when they eventually realize their stock is worth nothing and collapse?  They can't go crying to the government like Goldman did.

Bill Gates has done something Goldman has failed to do.  He has become richer than god, all the while establishing a brand that actually is worth something.  Goldman should keep their suggestions on "smart" business practices to themselves and leave business to the people who are actually good at it.

Re: Goldman Sachs: Xbox Division Should be Spun Off

I'm inclined to agree with Matt Rosoff here.  Microsoft letting go of the strong brand name and Xbox losing Microsoft's support would hurt both sides of the divorce if it went through.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
black mantaVox Day has openly stated his support of GG many times. And both they and the Sad Puppies essentially want the same things (i.e. purging video games/science fiction of SJWs whom they believe are threatening the genre.)06/30/2015 - 12:08am
Goth_SkunkHowever, The notion that GamerGate and Sad Puppies are the same perpetrators is preposterous.06/29/2015 - 11:24pm
Goth_SkunkIdeologically. Additionally, libertarians can be both left and right leaning, and as Allum Bokhari has shown, people supporting GamerGate overwhelmingly tend to lean left-of-center politically.06/29/2015 - 11:18pm
black mantaAlso, the quote from Vox Day there (as well as an advertisement for his books) just tells me all I need to know. And that GG and the Sad Puppies are connected.06/29/2015 - 10:49pm
black mantaIt is still a fringe group. If it is Libertarian (and i can see its Libertarian appeal) it leans more to the right side of it.06/29/2015 - 10:48pm
Goth_Skunk"GamerGate Came To Life When It Was Declared Dead" - http://ow.ly/OXOm806/29/2015 - 9:10pm
Goth_SkunkAnd, like the microtransactions in Mass Effect 3 and Dragon Age: Inquisition, completely optional and voluntary. http://ow.ly/OXIRH06/29/2015 - 8:12pm
PHX Corphttp://www.gamespot.com/articles/halo-5-guardians-dev-clarifies-how-microtransactio/1100-6428510/ Apparently 343's Smoking Something, They tried to Clarify the microtransactions side of multiplayer unaware that Microtransactions in $60 Games=BAD06/29/2015 - 7:54pm
MattsworknameGoth, add vox, polygon, and most print media to that list for me. Also, add msnbc to that list, as long as they have people like shults, matthews, sharpton, hayes and so forth, will not watch06/29/2015 - 7:33pm
Goth_SkunkThat's fair, I treat every article from 'The Mary Sue' in the exact same manner. As well as Polygon, Kotaku, and Gamasutra, to name a few others.06/29/2015 - 7:17pm
Infophile"www.breitbart.com..." and I'm done reading. Got better things to do with my life.06/29/2015 - 5:40pm
Goth_SkunkHarping On: The Hypocrisy And Lies of Twitter's Most Notorious 'Anti-Abuse' Activist, part 1 of 3: http://ow.ly/OXsfP06/29/2015 - 5:12pm
ZippyDSMleeGot another weapon finished up ^^ http://zippydsmlee.tumblr.com/post/122614396265/zippylabs-rushhour-automatic-poison-dart-gun06/29/2015 - 4:37pm
ZippyDSMleeI wish they would revive Shining Force as a decent Warcraft clone with TB option...06/29/2015 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeFrom my genisis days the only other TBS I enjoyed was Sorcerers Kingdom and Warsong The only down side to Shining Force as a seriers they took out towns on the Sega CD ports and later games....06/29/2015 - 4:13pm
ZippyDSMleeE. Zachary Knight: Shining Force is awesome the aera damage done by mages,ect really make it shine. I miss that in ZOE:Fist of mars where there is no aera damage but you have a neat real time targeting system.06/29/2015 - 4:11pm
Goth_SkunkShaved my head for the first of many times in my life today. I refuse to bear a receding hairline: It's all-or-nothing for me with regards to my hair loss.06/29/2015 - 3:52pm
james_fudgeEZK: great game06/29/2015 - 2:51pm
E. Zachary KnightBack to my initial question, I started playing Shining Force 1. So far a pretty cool tactical RPG. I am looking forward to playing more.06/29/2015 - 1:27pm
PHX Corphttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_euReGOTGk Arkham Shite (The Jimquisition)06/29/2015 - 11:55am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician