Games, DVDs, may be Subject to New CPSC Rule

October 11, 2010 -

According to a report on the Media & Entertainment Services Alliance, a new rule from Consumer Product Safety Commission may make it so that packaged media like DVDs, videogames, and other products aimed at children will have tracking labels attached to them (PDF).

Part of the Consumer Products Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA), the rule was meant to satisfy a congressional mandate for safety recalls on children’s products related to things like lead levels from toys and other products from China.

Most DVDs and videogames are not supposed to be subject to the new rule, but as EMA VP of Public Affairs Sean Bersell points out, some children’s entertainment may be classified by the CPSC as "children’s products." under this new rule anyway. The CPSC interprets a children's product as a "consumer product designed or intended primarily for children twelve years of age or younger."

In a note to EMA members, Bersell says that the rule provides "no blanket exemption for movies and video games aimed at children under age four." This is apparently a reversal of an earlier proposed interpretation. Bersell adds that the agency "had previously suggested that very young children lack the motor skills to personally use the products and the physical products themselves (as opposed to the content they contain) have no appeal to children."

This new rule takes effect upon publication in the Federal Register, located here.

Source: MESA Alliance


Comments

Re: Games, DVDs, may be Subject to New CPSC Rule

I wonder what this law will mean for makers of trading cards aimed at children considering the labels in question have to be permanent and remain with the product. It wouldn't do to label the packaging, as that is usually intended to be thrown away. It also wouldn't do to label a single card in each foil package, for cards in a given package are unlikely to remain together in the long term. Does this mean each card have to be labeled individually, effectively defacing the carefully-designed artwork on each card?

This is the kind of ill-thought law that really bugs me. Instead of requiring products to be labeled, how about requiring manufacturers to, in the event of a recall, recall all products that are indistinguishable from those being recalled? Manufacturers could then add distinguishing marks as they see fit and weigh the costs of doing so against the likelihood and costs of a potential recall.

Re: Games, DVDs, may be Subject to New CPSC Rule

This has absolutely nothing to do with the ratings of the game or maturity of the intended audience.  This was a horrible law created out of overreaction to the various toy recalls that makes it so every component of an item meant for children must be tested for dangerous substances (i.e. lead).  The testing is about $500 per test, so if you have a complex toy with dozens of parts, this can start to get expensive.

The basic effect is that small businesses are being run out of business, while Mattel (who were the reason this law was enacted) were given an opt out of the law and are the only company allowed to test all of their products in house.  Oh...and guess who just issued another $10 million toy recall...

Mattel.

I'm all for protecting the children, but this is a horrible, horrible law.

Re: Games, DVDs, may be Subject to New CPSC Rule

Big Corporations have a long history of lobbying for restrictive laws and regulations for their industry for solely the purpose of keeping newer companies from forming. It happens in the toy business, the software industry, the copyright industry, even cosmetology. Government regulation is the friend of people and companies with deep pockets.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: Games, DVDs, may be Subject to New CPSC Rule

Perhaps so, but only when the regulations are WRITTEN by those deep-pocketed companies.

Which, unfortunately, is the majority of the time.

Re: Games, DVDs, may be Subject to New CPSC Rule

Shit, really? That's fucked all to hell...

Oh shit! Hasbro! Transformers! They got a shit load of little parts. I hope this doesn't fuck them too bad... Or LEGOS! Not my precious LEGOS man, not my LEGOS...

Re: Games, DVDs, may be Subject to New CPSC Rule

Interesting.

This could actually be quite helpful, because if the age of twelve is the threshold for a game being "aimed at children", according to the government itself (which I'm not sure if this counts), that means that Leland Yee and his ilk should have some difficulty in claiming that the game industry markets its "ultra violent and graphic sex games" to minors, as the only games that would even remotely qualify for that are all labeled M for Mature. As in, not for kids twelve and below.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Who's responsible for crappy Netflix performance on Verizon?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilson@pm I doubt it. Google seems to be distancing themselves from G+07/25/2014 - 9:31pm
Papa MidnightGoogle+ Integration is coming to Twitch!07/25/2014 - 8:41pm
MaskedPixelanteThis whole Twitch thing just reeks of Google saying "You thought you could get away from us and our policies. That's adorable."07/25/2014 - 2:52pm
Sleaker@james_fudge - hopefully that's the case, but I wont hold my breath for it to happen.07/25/2014 - 1:08pm
SleakerUpdate on crytek situation is a bit ambiguous, but I'm glad they finally said something: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2014-07-25-crytek-addresses-financial-situation07/25/2014 - 1:07pm
E. Zachary KnightMan Atlas, Why do you not want me to have any money? Why? http://www.atlus.com/tears2/07/25/2014 - 12:06pm
Matthew WilsonI agree with that07/25/2014 - 10:45am
james_fudgeI think Twitch will have more of an impact on how YouTube/Google Plus work than the other way around.07/25/2014 - 10:22am
IanCWelp, twitch is going to suck now. Thanks google.07/25/2014 - 6:30am
Sleaker@MP - Looked up hitbox, thanks.07/24/2014 - 9:40pm
Matthew WilsonI agree, but to me given other known alternatives google seems to the the best option.07/24/2014 - 6:30pm
Andrew EisenTo be clear, I have no problem with Google buying it, I'm just concerned it will make a slew of objectively, quantifiably bad changes to Twitch just as it's done with YouTube over the years.07/24/2014 - 6:28pm
Matthew WilsonI doubt yahoo has the resources to pull it off, and I not just talking about money.07/24/2014 - 6:15pm
SleakerI wouldn't have minded a Yahoo purchase, probably would have been a better deal than Tumblr seeing as they paid the same for it...07/24/2014 - 6:13pm
MaskedPixelanteIt's the golden age of Hitbox, I guess.07/24/2014 - 6:08pm
Matthew Wilsonagain twitch was going to get bought. It was just who was going to buy it . Twitch was not even being able to handle the demand, so hey needed a company with allot of infrastructure to help them. I can understand why you would not want Google to buy it .07/24/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew Eisen"Google is better than MS or Amazon" Wow. Google, as I mentioned earlier, progressively makes almost everything worse and yet there are still two lesser options. Again, wow!07/24/2014 - 5:43pm
Andrew EisenI don't know. MS, in my experience, is about 50/50 on its products. It's either fine or it's unusable crap. Amazon, well... I've never had a problem buying anything from them but I don't use any of their products or services so I couldn't really say.07/24/2014 - 5:42pm
Matthew WilsonGoogle is better than MS or Amazon.07/24/2014 - 5:33pm
Sleaker@AE - I've never seen youtube as a great portal to interact with people from a comment perspective. like ever. The whole interface doesn't really promote that.07/24/2014 - 5:28pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician