WWE Strikes Back

October 15, 2010 -

World Wrestling Entertainment is tired of getting bad press at the hands of politicians in Connecticut. The company pointed out in a press release today that both Democrats and Republicans liked the organization just fine during the 2008 presidential election campaign and during its long-running SmackDown the Vote campaigns. In 2008 when the candidates Barack Obama, John McCain and Hillary Clinton wanted to court voters via the Monday Night RAW show no one had a problem with the WWE’s image. Now that its former CEO Linda McMahon, is running for political office (the Senate seat vacated by Chris Dodd), the WWE is some kind of evil empire.

The company provided quotes from 2008:

President Obama said: "Hey, WWE fans. I hope you are all enjoying the program tonight. You know, this is a historic time for America. It’s not just that the reign of Randy Orton is coming to an end, it is at this moment in this election, we have a chance to finally end business as usual in Washington. For a long time now, we’ve had a politics where our leaders go after each other like they’re competing to become King of the Ring instead of coming together to provide universal health care, fix our economy, solve our other problems. That’s what I’m running for President to change. So to the special interests, who have been setting the agenda in Washington for too long, to all the forces of division and distraction that have stopped us from making progress; for the American people, I have one question: ‘do you smell what Barack is cooking’?"

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said: "Hi, I’m Hillary Clinton, but tonight, in honor of the WWE, you can call me Hill-Rod. This election is starting to feel a lot like King of the Ring. The only difference: the last man standing may just be a woman. The truth is this election is so important. The next President will face a stack full of difficult challenges right from the opening bell: to fix the economy, to bring our troops home from Iraq, and make college more affordable. You need a President who will go to the mat for you, and that’s exactly what I’ll do. I’ve been knocked down, but I’ve always gotten back up. And I know how to take a hit for the American people. And if things get a little tough, I may even have to deliver the People’s Elbow because this country is worth fighting for. Now I promise to stick to the political arena. So don’t worry Randy Orton. You’re safe, for now. When it comes to standing up for the American people, though, I am ready to rumble."

Senator John McCain said: "How are ya South Carolina? Finally the Mac has come back to Greenville. Looks like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama want to settle their differences in the ring. Well, that’s fine with me, but let me tell ya, if ya wanna be the man, ya have to beat the man. Come November, it’ll be game over. And whatcha gonna do when John McCain and all his ‘McCainiacs’ run wild on you? You want to pull out of Iraq? Well I say no surrender. America can win the war against terror. I’m gonna introduce Osama bin Laden to the Undertaker. Wanna raise taxes? Well I want a smaller government and bigger individuals. You see my friends, I believe that America is the greatest nation in the world, and Americans don’t watch wrestling because we’re bitter. We watch WWE because wrestling is about celebrating our freedom. It’s about fighting to be the very best. So can you smell what the Mac is cookin? Let me give you a little straight talk WWE fans. You might need a ticket to the Fatal Four next weekend, but you don’t need a ticket to the cage match in November. All you have to do is get out there and vote. YOU decide the champion. YOU make the difference. And that’s the bottom line, because John McCain said so."

No doubt, some politicians would like to forget that the WWE helped them indirectly garner votes from the 18 – 30 year old demographic. You can read the rest at Politico. You can also check out video of McCain, Pelosi, Obama and Clinton singing the praises of the WWE at WWE.com.


Comments

Re: WWE Strikes Back

I personally remember the Hill-rod statement from Hillary and immediately reintroducing my palm to my face, however, the one thing I really remember from that night is the McCainiacs statement delivered in John McCain's signature monotonous style and cringing upon hearing it. But hey, at least Barack delivered on the "Do you smell what Barack is cookin'?" joke.

Honestly, Linda McMahon is the better candidate in the Connecticut race and considering her present competition, I hope she does win because the other guy is basically running on "I'm angry, but I have no stand-points with which to base my campaign on other than attack you".

The thing about American politics, though, and the reason that these tactics tend to work - and quite successfully at that usually - is a lot of people have very-very short memory spans with regards to politics.

----
Papa Midnight
http://www.thesupersoldiers.com

----
Papa Midnight

Re: WWE Strikes Back

An age old tactic, bring up pld irrelevant facts about your opponent to make them soem kind of monster

Re: WWE Strikes Back

"You liked me enough to want me to help you get votes, but now I'm running for office and you're saying I'm evil" is irrelevant? Making your opposition look like liars and hypocrites is irrelevant?

Not saying I want Linda to win, just saying.

I'm Charlie Owens, good night, and good luck.

I'm Charlie Owens, good night, and good luck.

Re: WWE Strikes Back

I think that hellfire meant that about what the politicos were doing to the WWE, not what WWE struck back with.

As to the larger point...I'm sure I'm not the first to say this, but attacking Mrs. McMahon based on her affiliation with WWE is a little dangerous. You risk looking elitist or classist. And the WWE is right - politicos have rarely had a problem using the WWE to drum up votes in the past.

That said, I think it should be patently obvious that the three presidential contenders were reading scripts provided to them. Then-Senator Obama was dropping references to Randy Orton, King of the Ring, and the Rock. Then-Senator Clinton was dropping references to King of the Ring, the Rock, and Randy Orton as well. And Senator McCain's little speech referenced the Rock, Ric Flair, Hulk Hogan, the Undertaker, and "Stone Cold" Steve Austin. Looking back on it now, arguably McCain's bit was the best of the three...perhaps the WWE was trying to make him look better than his Democratic rivals.

And let's face it...'ring psychology' dictates that you attack your opponent at their weakest places. Watch some WWE programming and you'll see what I mean - one wrestler will constantly attack their opponent's knee, ankle, back, or neck. The wrestler will especially target something that is known to be injured or have been injured in the past. They will also target parts that are vital to their opponent's finishing moves. So it only makes sense for Mr. Blumenthal, the DNC, DSCC, etc, to target Mrs. McMahon's long-standing affiliation with - and ownership of - the WWE, particularly given the long list of injuries and tragic deaths for which most folks hold the WWE responsible.

Spekkio, Master of war

Re: WWE Strikes Back

I am damn tired of that list being thrown around like everyone on it was shot in the head by the McMahons. Some folks on there died in accidents or of natural causes, others NEVER got a WWE paycheck in their careers. Giant Gonzales died of complications due to him having diabetes, how the fuck is that WWE's fault?

I'm Charlie Owens, good night, and good luck.

I'm Charlie Owens, good night, and good luck.

Re: WWE Strikes Back

Gonzalez might not be accurate but defending WWF/E is very hard to do.

* This is the company that thought the necrophilia was a good idea. HHH must be proud of that moment. When that skid was done about a third of the stadium left in digust.

* This is the company that had steriods galore on the dressing rooms during the 90's with the Vince McMahon himself using them. Not to mention that their so called "wellness" policy is literaly a joke.

* This is the company that let Shawn Michaels wrestle with a serious head injury causing him to drop like a stone on a live event. (Look for Shawn Michaels VS Owen Heart on YouTube)

* Speaking of Owen Heart didn't he died due to a faulty line and drop over 50 feet to his death. Oh yeah I saw that first hand. Amazingle OSHA didn't do much on the matter.

* Oh let's not forget about Eddie Guerreo. When he passed away there was a so called moment of grieving and then WHAM! Let's piss all over his legacy by dragging his memrory through the mud for nearly a year.

* And what about Benoit the wife killer?? don't get me started with that crap.

I have been a wrestling fan for over 27 years and the WWE single handedly has turned wrestling into a royal joke. I understand their point of view and they are damn right but for you to try to remotely defend this shithole of a company and make them look like they have never done something wrong is simply a laughable attempt to humanize them.

Re: WWE Strikes Back

I'm not defending the whole fucking company. I'm saying, if you're going to rip into WWE for causing some people to die young, make sure you have your facts straight.

I'm Charlie Owens, good night, and good luck.

I'm Charlie Owens, good night, and good luck.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Code Avarice's Paranautical Activity make its way back onto Steam?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Neo_DrKefkaSomeone anyone tell me how two wrongs somehow make a right? This is becoming exhausting and both sides are out of there minds!10/25/2014 - 11:40am
Neo_DrKefkaSo two GamerGate supporters received a knife and syringe in the mail today. The same GamerGate supporters who said how awful it was were seen in other tweets gathering lists and sending our similar threats or harassment to shut down the other side....10/25/2014 - 11:36am
NeenekoJust look at how interviews are handled. Media tends to pit someone who is at best a journalist, but usually entertainer, against an expert, and it is presented and percieved as if they are equals.10/25/2014 - 7:38am
Neeneko@MC - Focusing on perpetrator does nothing for prevention, the media and public lack the domain knowledge and event details to draw any useful conclusions. All we get are armchair risk experts.10/25/2014 - 7:36am
Neeneko@AE - no name or picture, I like it.10/25/2014 - 7:34am
PHX Corp@MW and AE The news media needs to stop promoting the Shooters. period10/25/2014 - 7:16am
Andrew EisenWhen I write about these massacres, I don't use the shooter's name or picture. I'm not saying everyone has to play it that way but that's how I prefer to do it.10/25/2014 - 12:44am
Andrew EisenYep, it's why the news media stopped spotlighting numbnuts who run out on the field during sporting events.10/25/2014 - 12:01am
Matthew Wilsonin media research its called the copycat effect. it simply says that if the news covers one mass shooting shooter, it increases the likelihood of another person going on a mass shooting.10/25/2014 - 12:00am
Andrew EisenAgreed. It bugs me that I know the names, faces and personal histories of a bunch of mass shooters but I couldn't tell you the name of or recognize a photo of a single one of their victims.10/24/2014 - 11:51pm
AvalongodAgree with Quiknkold. @Mecha...if that worked we would have figured out how to prevent these long ago.10/24/2014 - 11:32pm
MechaCrashUnfortunately, you have to focus on the perpetrator to figure out the whys so you can try to prevent it from happening again.10/24/2014 - 10:55pm
quiknkoldpoor girl. poor victims. rather focus on them then the shooter. giving too much thought to the monster takes away from the victims.10/24/2014 - 10:15pm
Andrew EisenFor what it's worth, early reports are painting the motive as "he was pissed that a particular girl wouldn't date him."10/24/2014 - 10:12pm
quiknkoldwell then I suck as a man cause I ask for help when necessary :P10/24/2014 - 10:07pm
Technogeek(That said, mostly I was making the smartass evopsych comment because your post seemed like the kind of just-so story that has come to dominate 99% of its usage.)10/24/2014 - 10:04pm
TechnogeekHell, Liam Neeson built his modern career around it. Cultural factors likely play a far greater role than you appear willing to admit.10/24/2014 - 10:03pm
TechnogeekSeriously, though, the idea of "because women are protectors and that's why they never commit school shootings" is, at best, grossly overreductive. There's nothing inherently feminine about being willing to kill in order to protect one's offspring.10/24/2014 - 10:03pm
MechaCrashThe "toxic masculinity" thing refers to how you have to SUCK IT UP AND BE A MAN because seeking help is seen as weakness, which means you suck at manliness, so it builds and builds and builds until something finally snaps.10/24/2014 - 10:01pm
quiknkoldthere, I'm done. And thats what Christmas is all about, Charlie Brown10/24/2014 - 9:54pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician