Piracy Makes Ready at Dawn Sad

October 29, 2010 -

While God of War: Ghost of Sparta is nearly complete, developer Ready at Dawn is not very delighted about it. Why? Because the company says that piracy on the PSP is way out of control and really hurts sales of even big PSP titles. Speaking to VG247 (thanks PlayStation Lifestyle), Ready At Dawn creative director Ru Weerasuriya lamented about dealing with piracy as a marquee PSP developer.

Weerasuriya said that it is "getting to the point where it doesn’t make sense to make games on it [PSP]." He also said that the PC has better ways of dealing with piracy such as "connectivity and multiplayer" - we assume he is referring to services like Steam. He also mentions Battle.net as a good example of how to combat piracy using a network connection.

You can read the rest of the interview here.

Posted in

Comments

Re: Piracy Makes Ready at Dawn Sad

He also said that the PC has better ways of dealing with piracy...

We're through the looking glass here, people.

Re: Piracy Makes Ready at Dawn Sad

Hmm I'm thinking his game sucks ass and he wants to have an excuse on why its not going to sell well.

 

 

Re: Piracy Makes Ready at Dawn Sad

But I thought consoles were the only safe bet when it came to making a profit in games?!? /s

When will these pinheads realize that if it can be unlocked on their terms, it can be cracked as well? Pissing on a peice of cake to discourage people from stealing puts off your customers from buying it too. If they want to continue selling copies, they're going to have to come to terms with the fact that not every copy in circulation is going to be paid for. They should be finding ways for getting paid to make the game first, then release it. That would boil down any filesharing to free publicity and distribution. I've never seen a contractor or landscaper do the whole job without a check, yet these developers complain when people distribute their hard work without payment. Well pal, you did the work and then put it out there, knowing full well that it would be cracked and copied. It's entirely your fault for not having a plan to take advantage of it.

-Greevar

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: Piracy Makes Ready at Dawn Sad

Here's the thing.  Developers do get money up front, some money anyway, when they make a deal with a publisher for a game.  However, most of the money they expect to get will come from royalties.  If they don't sell well, they get far less money from royalties.  In that way rampant piracy will negatively impact how much money they make.  I'm not arguing that every pirated copy is a lost sale.  But some of them are and piracy on the PSP is huge.

Blaming the developer for not making enough money before finishing and selling their product is ridiculous.  Blaming the developers for wanting to get paid for their work and being unhappy when people steal it is even more ridiculous.

===============

Chris Kimberley

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Piracy Makes Ready at Dawn Sad

While I don't buy the argument that it's entirely their fault -- not all plans work out, after all, and just because piracy is inevitable doesn't mean pirates are absolved of fault -- I agree with your larger point.  DRM doesn't stop piracy, it only inconveniences legitimate customers.  That doesn't mean that going DRM-free and aggressively promoting your game will automatically make it a success, but it's a much better start than assuming you can lock down ones and zeroes against duplication.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MechaCrashGee, how did people ever get the idea Gaters are morons who argue in bad faith? It's such a mystery.07/02/2015 - 7:03am
E. Zachary KnightGoth, again, no one is saying that we shouldn't be writig uncomfortable subject matter. What people are saying is that chances are you are going to write it poorly so it would be better to not have done it at all.07/02/2015 - 7:00am
Goth_Skunkdiscussed or portrayed in an expressive medium. Such an opinion only serves to stifle discussion. And as I said before, the only thing not worth talking about is what shouldn't be talked about.07/02/2015 - 6:50am
Goth_Skunk@Info: The same reason why I would entertain the notion that the Wired article writer could be right: Curiosity. Except in this case, I'm not curious at all. I'm not interested in hearing anyone's opinion on why uncomfortable subject matter shouldn't be07/02/2015 - 6:49am
IvresseI think the problem with the Batmobile is that they made it a core aspect of the game that you have to do continuously. If it was basically a couple of side games that were needed for secret stuff or a couple of times in the main game, it would be fine.07/02/2015 - 5:38am
Infophile@Goth: If you're not willing to entertain the idea you might be wrong, fine. That's your right. But why should anyone else entertain the idea that you might be right? If they go by the same logic, they already know you're wrong, so why listen to you?07/02/2015 - 3:53am
MattsworknameEh, I love the new batmobile personally, it's a blast to mess aroudn with. Plus, the game is set in a situation that mroe or less leaves batman with no choice but to go full force. And even then, it still shows him doing all he can to limit casualties.07/01/2015 - 11:38pm
Andrew EisenAgreed. Luckily, we don't seem to be in danger of that of late. No one's suggesting, for example, that tanks shouldn't be in video games, only that the tank in Arkham Knight is poorly implemented and out of place from a characterization standpoint.07/01/2015 - 11:27pm
MattsworknameConfederate flag, Relgious organizations, etc etc. Andrew isnt[ wrong, just remember not to let that mentality lead to censorship.07/01/2015 - 11:20pm
Mattsworknamefind offensive or disturbing, and that mindset leads to censorship. It's all well and good to say "This would be better IF", just so long as we remember not to let it slide into "This is offensive, REMOVE IT". IE , the current issues surroundign the07/01/2015 - 11:19pm
MattsworknameAndrew and goth both have points, and to that point, I'll say. Saying somethign is improved by changing something isn't a problem, on that I agree with , but at the same time, on of the issues we have in our society is that we want to simply remove things07/01/2015 - 11:18pm
Andrew EisenSee? Suggestions for improvements that involve taking things away do not mean the work is garbage or performing poorly, critically or commercially.07/01/2015 - 9:29pm
Andrew EisenSkyward Sword is spiff-a-rific but it would be an improved experience if the game didn't explain what each item and rupee was every single time you picked them up!07/01/2015 - 9:27pm
Andrew EisenHere's another: De Blob is a ton of fun but it would be improved without motion controls. Incidentally, THQ heard our cries, removed motion controls for the sequel and it was a better game for it!07/01/2015 - 9:24pm
Andrew EisenI'll give you an example: Arkham Knight is a ton of fun but the tank sucks and the game would be even better without it.07/01/2015 - 9:23pm
Goth_SkunkWell clearly we're diametrically opposed about that.07/01/2015 - 9:03pm
Andrew EisenNot even remotely true.07/01/2015 - 8:59pm
Goth_SkunkIt is, if the suggestion involves taking something away from a product in order to make it better.07/01/2015 - 8:49pm
Andrew EisenOffering suggestions for improvement does not mean that the work in question is garbage or not doing fine.07/01/2015 - 8:21pm
Goth_SkunkIf their products were garbage, they wouldn't be as praiseworthy as they are.07/01/2015 - 8:08pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician