Daily Show Offers Take on Violent Game Debate

November 5, 2010 -

Comedy Central’s The Daily Show served up a segment last night offering correspondent John Hodgman’s take on the Supreme Court, Schwarzenegger vs. EMA and banning the sale of violent games to minors in California.

Hodgman, when asked by host Jon Stewart if the Supreme Court should ban violent videogames for children, responded, “No, that’s absurd John.”

He continued, tongue firmly in cheek, “Videogames are a form of expression. They are the novels of the next-generation."

"To ban them would be like banning Moby Dick just because Captain Ahab tears the whale’s head off, pees down its neck and then sets it on fire. Which happened… at least according to the videogame of Moby Dick that I played.”

Hodgman then goes on to offer a variety of suggestions for solving the violent videogame problem and making games more relevant to the Supreme Court Justices.

Hilarious. Thanks Joystiq!


Comments

Re: Daily Show Offers Take on Violent Game Debate

Not being able to watch that clip because I'm in the UK isn't what's annoying.

What is annoying is that the broadcaster responsible for The Daily Show in the UK, Channel 4, is probably the best of all the domestic broadcasters for making their content- including that acquired from the US- online. You'd think they'd have thrashed out some sort of agreement for selling ads on The Daily Show's website by now.

/b

Re: Daily Show Offers Take on Violent Game Debate

There are assault rifles on WalMart on sale in the U.S.? It is true?

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Daily Show Offers Take on Violent Game Debate

Closest I've seen are Nerf, Buzz Bee, various other toy guns, and Airsoft. Nothing real.

Re: Daily Show Offers Take on Violent Game Debate

http://i.walmartimages.com/i/if/hmp/fusion/SpecialOrderGunCatalog.pdf

Found that in about 3 clicks from the front page of walmart.com. Yes, they sell guns, just not in certain states and locations.

Re: Daily Show Offers Take on Violent Game Debate

That depends on what you mean by "assault rifle". Fully automatic weapons of any kind, no; there's a LOT of paperwork involved in simply owning those, let alone buying or selling. Semi-automatic rifles, probably; most likely they're meant for hunting or target shooting. Doubt they're of any decent quality, but it's not like Wal-Mart is known for quality anything.

Re: Daily Show Offers Take on Violent Game Debate

The Daily Show always make me chuckle when they satire politics  like this.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Daily Show Offers Take on Violent Game Debate

Amusing, but it's obvious they only have a cursory understanding of the issue and the SCOTUS case (or just just went for the funny over the substance).  Doesn't even mention the California law in question, or the fact that many of the Justices (especially Scalia) were very critical of it.

Oh, and since I don't know where else to put this, here's a comic from Virtual Shackles about the case:

http://www.virtualshackles.com/-160

Re: Daily Show Offers Take on Violent Game Debate

If you've ever seen Jon Stewart during appearances on other news programs or during the interview segment on the Daily Show, you'd see he usually has a very clear understanding of the issues of the day. This is for entertainment and isn't meant to be a primary news source. I'm sure if they did try to mention the law and how critical the Justices are over it, they'd just bore the audience.

Re: Daily Show Offers Take on Violent Game Debate

(or just just went for the funny over the substance)

You are aware that "The Daily Show" is on Comedy Central, right?  I'm pretty sure they were going for the funny.

Hodgman is terrific, too.

Re: Daily Show Offers Take on Violent Game Debate

About the concept that killing a vulcano is OK for California´s law, the law also looks to avoid children to play games with sexual violence.

So, it is also OK a game in which you can rape vulcans? Maybe elf girls are OK too?

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Daily Show Offers Take on Violent Game Debate

Well its just satire.  I'm sure most of Stewart's audience are gamers anyway.  Good chance for the gaming industry to learn to have a sense of humor about these issues.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightConster, I think that might be a little uncalled for.05/04/2015 - 10:20am
MattsworknameConster, I vet what your saying, but lets not bring up Baltimore, that place had a very bad week.05/03/2015 - 5:48pm
MattsworknameFair enough Infophile, regardless of my own issues with the gaming industry and press, im just sorta tired of the whole GG thing as it is. it just seems pointless now you know?05/03/2015 - 5:46pm
ConsterThe trolls hiding behind GG may be too busy pretending to be looters in Baltimore right now.05/03/2015 - 3:32pm
InfophileWhich is to say, GG isn't people writing articles about GG; it's the swarm of people lashing out. That's still going on, even if not as many articles are being written about it05/03/2015 - 7:32am
InfophileIt's not about the articles, but about the people receiving threats. Found an article from just last week which says Zoe Quinn is still receiving daily threats: http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/article/2015/04/28/gamergate/05/03/2015 - 7:31am
Mattsworknameup hating the game industry on a more general level .05/03/2015 - 7:25am
MattsworknameIts funny, you know what i just realized, I love video games, and I hate the industry that has been forged around them. I hate the big name publishers, the press, all that jazz. But I still love gaming. that kinda sucks that I love games and still wind05/03/2015 - 7:25am
MattsworknameIt's like teh whole thing just went quiet.05/03/2015 - 6:28am
MattsworknameInfophile, I haven't really seen much activity either way, other then a few minor articles here or there, its like GG just sorta went dormant. I dont deny that I have some concerns with gaming press and industry, but I followed GG the last few months05/03/2015 - 6:28am
Infophile@Mattsworkname: It's more of a case that many media outlets have lost interest in their usual actions. "GamerGate still viciously harassing Zoe Quinn" isn't exactly news. Even if they are. *puts on sea lion hunting gear* Come at me, GG! I dare ya!05/03/2015 - 4:40am
MattsworknameAs much a I have some of the same concerns GG supposibly crusades against, i was really under the impression GG had sorta gone into dormantcy , it had been kinda quiet the last feww months05/02/2015 - 7:42pm
Matthew Wilsonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bxcc3SM_KA if you guys haven't seen it, john oliver goes after patent trolls.05/02/2015 - 6:50pm
Matthew Wilsonwhile I dont like the guests, who ever did this is stupid. I can understand not liking GG, but come on.05/02/2015 - 6:17pm
Wonderkarpwell how about that shi.....poop05/02/2015 - 6:07pm
Andrew EisenKotaku caught it. Ran the story an hour ago. http://kotaku.com/gamergate-meetup-evacuated-after-apparent-threat-170176164505/02/2015 - 5:36pm
Wonderkarpevent was treading pretty hardcore on twitter last night. course thats just twitter. I'll agree with you if it does get reported05/02/2015 - 5:25pm
Andrew EisenAwkward wording on my part but "event" was referring to the bomb threat. It's silly to chastise mainstream press for not covering something that happened a mere 12 hours earlier, well after close of business on Friday, at a gathering very few knew about.05/02/2015 - 5:14pm
Wonderkarpthey arent "uppity" over the event not being covered. they are uppity over the harassment/bombthreats not being reported.05/02/2015 - 5:09pm
Andrew EisenWe've known that for quite a while now but I agree, completely cutting the feature is not a good move.05/02/2015 - 3:49pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician