George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

November 17, 2010 -

A George Mason University teacher believes that society is blind to the permeation of videogame addiction in college students; a problem so widespread that she believes it is swelling the number of dropouts.

Demonstrating less tactfulness than Rush Limbaugh (yes, that was odd to write), Erica Jacobs kicks off her column by alluding that Virginia Tech shooter Seung-Hui Cho’s addiction to Counter-Strike contributed to his actions, before recounting the tale a student of hers told about a roommate at school that became so addicted to World of Warcraft, he eventually dropped out.

After this paper was read in Jacobs’ class, "each [of the other students] had a similar story of a family member or friend who was addicted to a video game.”

Jacobs goes on to reference a 2008 speech by (then) FCC Commissioner Deborah Taylor Tate, who billed online game addiction as “one of the top reasons” students dropping out of college.

“No one is immune from addiction,” wrote Jacobs, who continued:

We cope with addictions to alcohol and drugs more readily than addictions to video games, and that blindness has put many college students in jeopardy of failing school. As we know, recognizing that a problem exists is the first step to dealing with it.

Remember, the addict could be you.


Comments

Re: George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

So, this piece lazily conflates physical addiction and psychological addiction (two substantially different, but superficially similar conditions) and then complains that there is a difference in how we deal with two things that are different?

Shoddy journalism.

 

Re: George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

Her trying to link video games to violence is onerous, but her overall point about accepting video game "addiction" as a potential issue that people may need help with is valid.

Hello, my name is Arell, and I... was addicted to World of Warcraft.  *sob

No seriously.  Back when I tried college for the second time, I was also playing the brand new game called WoW.  A year into the game, I was playing 3-4 hours a night weekdays, and more than 6 hours a day weekends.  But I was also reading and posting on forums for hours at a time, dealing with Guild business as the GL, and working to maintain a website for the guild.  I'd use Computer Labs on campus to go over instance strategies on the official forums, and doodle talent builds in class.  Did this effect my grades?  Oh hell yeah.  Was it why I eventually dropped out... again?  No.

I was actually trying to cope with my mother's cancer that year, and then her death.  I retreated to an MMO to shut out the pain, and to have control over my character's life where I felt I didn't have any in my real life.  I finally realized that this was stupid and that it was hurting me, and I actually forced myself to quit cold turkey.  Even then, I had a kind of phychological withdraw for about 2 weeks.  I thought about WoW, I dreamt about WoW, I'd catch myself starting to open WoW websites when I sat down at the computer, and then paced the hallway outside my computer room when I tried not using the computer.  I did get back to normal, and my grades and social life did improve.  Of course, I eventually dropped out of college when I realized I didn't have any real goal in mind and was just blowing a shitload of money to learn things I couldn't use to get a better job.

The biggest thing is, I never blamed the video game.  It was all my own fucking fault!  But that doesn't mean I didn't have a problem that I could have used help to end sooner.  Gamers often get defensive when the topic of "game addiction" comes up, because gamers are used to people blaming their hobby for everything.  But just because the person's compulsion is video games, does not make gaming inherently bad.  And GOOD psychologists don't demonize video games, either.  Just as they don't demonize gambling, sex, food, shopping, or Justin Beber for other forms of obsessive behavior.

I didn't bother reading her column, the whole Virginia Tech thing sort of soured her opinion for me.  But people with obsessive problems need help.  Sometimes just family and friends, sometimes professional therapy.  But just because their obsession is a video game, doesn't mean it should reflect badly on games as a whole, or that the person's problem can be dismissed as not real.  It's not wrong to recognize that a large number of people are dropping out because they can't lay off the video games.  We just need to figure out how to help them, without making the video games the villan in all this.

Re: George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

For those interested, Erica responded to my correction about Cho. I don't think she will be updating the actual article, but she admitted as much in the comments. Here is what she said:

I stand corrected. Since the column was not about Cho, I didn't do as much research on that lead-in as I should have. Even though I only mention a suspicion that there was a link between the video game and the shootings (which might be technically accurate), the implication was still incorrect, and for that I apologize. I stand by the main points of my column, though.
Thanks for pointing out my error.


E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

Do we get a link to the column in question? I would like to read the whole thing.

Nevermind, I found it myself:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/local/Erica-Jacobs-Video-game-addictio...

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

oh, it was in the Examiner... yeah... not concerned... right-wing rag. Terrible freebie paper they give out at Metro stops... except almost no one takes them. We take the Express (Washington Post's freebie).

Re: George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

Thanks for the link.

EDIT: Whoops, and sorry for sniping you on the Counter-Strike bit; your post wasn't up yet when I wrote mine.

Yours is more diplomatic and maybe I should have dialed down the snark, but seriously, FIRST MATCH in a Google search for "virginia tech" "counter-strike".

Re: George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

Theres addiction and addiction, or can't live without it vrs reversed priorities. If reverse priorities where a clinical mental issue the US goverment would be surrounded by paddy wagons...


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

"Seung-Hui Cho’s addiction to Counter-Strike contributed to his actions"

If I remember correctly didnt Cho play in his early youth and his roomate confirm that he hadnt seen him play anything?

Maybe I'm remembering that wrong but that came to mind.

Now on to this comment: "We cope with addictions to alcohol and drugs more readily than addictions to video games, and that blindness has put many college students in jeopardy of failing school."

Is this guy really claiming that mental addiction is worse than physical addiction? Comical.

 

This guy has a firm grip on his soapbox.

 

Re: George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

The whole Counter-strike thing with Cho came from a single paragraph in a Washington Post story that was later removed. The official findings of the task force assigned to figure out what actually happened only mentioned him playing basketball and Sonic the Hedgehog in his youth.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

The only people who kept on about that connection I think was one lawyer who kiept claiming Cho ditched his hard drive in a lake to hide that he played.

Even after the Washington Post pulled the article and apologized.

Re: George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

Moron. Addiction forms a dependancy, where your body will not function properly if you do not feed the chemical dependancy. If anything, playing non-stop video games is a pathological disorder stemming from social problems. You can stop playing videogames and not have withdrawl symptoms. Drugs and alcohol...not so much.

---------

James Fletcher, member of ECA Canada

Re: George Mason Teacher Lectures on Game Addiction

Behavorial Addiction is seen as a real phenomenon by many people anymore.  Classifying "addiction" as solely something chemical based hasn't been true for decades.  You can argye the symantics all you want about specific "definitions," it doesn't change the fact that many people display addictive behavior to: gambling, sex, exercise, work, internet, cutting, idolizing, shopping, food/eating, and even video games.  These people compulsively and obsessively continue activities to the detriment of their health, mental state, and social life.  Solving "compulsion" is not always as easy as choosing to stop.  Sometimes people need help.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curse knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
Matthew WilsonSF have to build upwards they have natural growth limits. they can not grow outwards. ps growing outwards is terable just look at Orlando or Austin for that.04/16/2014 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeIf they built upward then it would becoem like every other place making it worthless, if they don't build upward they will price people out making it worthless, what they need to do is a mix of things not just one exstreme or another.04/16/2014 - 4:00pm
Matthew Wilsonyou know the problem in SF was not the free market going wrong right? it was government distortion. by not allowing tall buildings to be build they limited supply. that is not free market.04/16/2014 - 3:48pm
ZippyDSMleeOh gaaa the free market is a lie as its currently leading them to no one living there becuse they can not afford it makign it worthless.04/16/2014 - 3:24pm
Matthew WilsonIf you have not read http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/introducing-steam-gauge-ars-reveals-steams-most-popular-games/ you should. It is a bit stats heavy, but worth the read.04/16/2014 - 2:04pm
Matthew Wilsonthe issue is when is doesn't work it can screw over millions in new york city's case. more often than not it is better to let the free market run its course without market distortion.04/16/2014 - 9:36am
NeenekoTrue, and overdone stagnation is a problem. It is a tricky balance. It does not help that when it does work, no one notices. Most people here have benifited from rent controls and not even realized it.04/16/2014 - 9:23am
ZippyDSMleehttp://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2014/04/15/riaa_files_civil_suit_against_megaupload04/16/2014 - 8:48am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician