Netflix Changes Coming Your Way

November 23, 2010 -

Netflix is changing and it is being blamed -- or if you prefer, attributed to -- the viewing habits of subscribers. Today Netflix informed subscribers that soon they would have to pay $1 more a month for the basic one-DVD-at-a-time plus streaming content subscription. The company also announced a $7.99 streaming-only option for consumers. The reason, they say, is that more users are streaming content via various devices -- Wii, Xbox 360, Ps3 -- than watching it via DVDs. The company predicts that by the end of 2010 streaming content consumption will finally outpace disc-based viewing.

While that may very well be true, Netflix's challenge is getting that streaming content to be more robust and current- a complaint voiced repeatedly on its blog today in the midst of this announcement. That being said, you can check out all the changes coming your way by visiting blog.netflix.com.

Posted in

Comments

Re: Netflix Changes Coming Your Way

I'm curious as to what the complaint is.  After years of running their service, during which they added the major and resource-intensive feature that is Watch Instantly (streaming), they are finally raising their monthly rate by a whole dollar, while also offering a new, less expensive plan for those who only want streaming and not DVDs.  Oh yeah, they are total monsters.  How dare they?

Re: Netflix Changes Coming Your Way

"I'm curious as to what the complaint is."

Then read the first comment in the thread.

I've got no problem paying an extra dollar a month, but I'd appreciate a more consistent library in return.  Ideally, that's what will happen; they'll reinvest that money in improving their infrastructure and their library and make it worth our while.

Re: Netflix Changes Coming Your Way

Part of the problem is the limitations in thier library are not due to infrastructure, it is due to contracts.  It is less likely that the increase is going into infrastructure, and more likely it is going into the coke and hookers that executives expect to be wooed with if you want access to the content they own. 

Re: Netflix Changes Coming Your Way

I have a different theory.

Now that they've driven Hollywood Video/Movie Gallery completely out of business and Blockbuster is on its death bed, they own the movie rental business without any competition and can do whatever they want with pricing.

Re: Netflix Changes Coming Your Way

Yep, streaming is better.  Of course, not everything is streamed on Netflix.  Including older material.  In fact, many TV episodes are missing for one reason or another, requiring you to order the DVD.  This is why I have the 2 DVD at a time with unlimited streaming.

Of course, those who have been using Watch Instantly also know that a streamed product can come and go and come back again.  Many of us keep a watch using instantwatcher.com to know when something new is coming to streaming.

Still, the DVDs have their purpose.  I have been known to order the bonus DVDs.  And commentary tracks are only available on the DVDs.  Some of the commentary is pretty good, especially for good TV shows.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: Netflix Changes Coming Your Way

I think you just outlined my complaints about their streaming service.  I currently subscribe to it, but it gets less and less use due to missing (or mislabled) episodes or content that can vanish at any time.

Their service really highlights the problem people have with these subscriptions, you have no control over which content is available and it can disappear at any moment because someone decided they wanted to have a back-room pissing contest.

The sad thing is... illegal sources are still better.   They have more content, the content is more likely to be complete and labeled correctly.. and once content is available it continues to be available.   Legallity asside, netflix streaming provides an inferrior service to hobbists working out of their basements.  It really shows the detrimental effect of low paid employies who do not care about the material and more resources being put in to allaying the fears of content owners then providing a product to paying customers.

It is one thing to say 'hey, pay for our stuff, it is good', it is another to say 'pay (more) for our stuff and we will give you something worse then what you were getting before, but hey, it is legal!'

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenNow, having said that, what sites are you reading that are claiming that if "you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem" or that gamers are "obligated to stop harassment"? Or was that hyperbole too?09/21/2014 - 1:03am
Andrew EisenFirst of all, ONE person in the Shout box suggested an obligation to call harassers out on their harassing but only after YOU brought it up. Plus, Techno said "when you see it happening." If you don't see it, you're not under any obligation.09/21/2014 - 1:02am
Sleaker@Craig R. - at this point I don't even know what the hashtags are suppsed to be in support of. what does GamerGate actually signify.09/21/2014 - 12:21am
Sleaker@AE - Hyperbole for the first 2, but it seems like some of the comments in the shout are attempting to place blame on fellow gamers because they aren't actively telling people to stop harassing even though they don't necessarily know anyone that has.09/21/2014 - 12:16am
Andrew EisenSleaker - Who the heck are you reading that is claiming "all gamers are bad," we "need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers," that if "you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem," or that gamers are "obligated to stop harassment"?09/20/2014 - 9:44pm
erthwjimhe swatted more than just krebs, I think he swatted 30 people http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/05/teen-arrested-for-30-swattings-bomb-threats/09/20/2014 - 9:31pm
Craig R.Btw, the guy who swatted security expert Brian Krebs? He got picked up recently. It can be done.09/20/2014 - 8:55pm
Craig R.Such things are not done in a vacuum... hence why the 4chan and other logs show what fools you've all been, tricked into doing the trolls' work09/20/2014 - 8:49pm
Sleaker@Technogeek - How do you call someone out that anonymously calls in a SWAT team, or sends threats to people?09/20/2014 - 7:04pm
Technogeek"It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so." I'd say you're certainly obligated to call them out when you see it happening.09/20/2014 - 5:17pm
SleakerNow if you disagree with anything in my last 2 posts then we obviously have a difference in world view, and wont come to any sort of agreement. I'm fine with that, maybe some people aren't?09/20/2014 - 5:09pm
SleakerIt also doesn't mean that just because a news outlet says that Gamers are the problem and you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem. It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so.09/20/2014 - 4:59pm
SleakerJust to re-iterate: People getting harassed is wrong. Just because someone is harassed by so called 'gamers' doesn't mean that all gamers are bad. nor does it mean that you need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers.09/20/2014 - 4:56pm
SleakerAnd furthermore just because someone doesn't 'crusade against the evil' that doesn't make them the problem. You can have discussion with those around you. There's a thing called sphere of influence.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
Sleaker@Conster - one person getting harassed is a 'problem' only so far as the harassee's are doing it. Just because a select few people choose to act like this doesn't make it widespread. Nor does it immediately make everyone responsible to put an end to it.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
james_fudgeno worries09/20/2014 - 4:15pm
TechnogeekI misread james' comment as "we can't have a debate without threatening" there at first. Actually wound up posting a shout about death threats and "kill yourself" not technically being the same thing before I realized.09/20/2014 - 3:59pm
james_fudgeDon't hit me *cowers behind Andrew*09/20/2014 - 3:20pm
ConsterYou take that back right now, james, or else. *shakes fist menacingly*09/20/2014 - 3:00pm
james_fudgeOur community is awesome. We can have a debate without threatening to kill each other.09/20/2014 - 2:50pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician