Prosecutors Bail on Xbox Modding Case

December 2, 2010 -

Federal Prosecutors in the nation’s first jury trial to test the anti-circumvention provisions of the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act abruptly asked that the case be dismissed today. Today's news comes on the heels of a tumultuous day in Federal Court yesterday. The presiding judge berated prosecutors for a litany of holes and contradictions in the government's case. The judge's strong words caused the prosecution to take a recess to decide whether to even bother to continue. They decided to forge ahead, and watched as their first witness ruined the case.

That first witness was Tony Rosario, an undercover agent with the Entertainment Software Association, who secretly recorded the defendant Matthew Crippen modding an Xbox. Rosario paid Crippen $60 bucks for the modification. Rosario had responded to an ad Crippen put on the internet, and met him at his Anaheim house. The government was trying to prove that Crippen was violating a provision in the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act by modding consoles. They also alleged that the hotel car-parking manager ran a small business from his Anaheim home.

So far so good for the prosecution, but here is where the case really unraveled, according to Wired (thanks E. Zachary Knight):

All of that had been laid out in pre-trial motions. But during his testimony, Rosario also said Crippen inserted a pirated video game into the console to verify that the hack worked. That was a new detail that helped the government meet an obligation imposed by the judge that very morning, when Gutierrez ruled that the government had to prove Crippen knew he was breaking the law by modding Xboxes.

But nowhere in Rosario’s reports or sworn declarations was it mentioned that Crippen put a pirated game into the console. Shortly before Rosario’s testimony during opening statements, defense attorney Koren Bell told jurors that there would be no evidence of that kind.

Defense attorney Callie Steele objected to the new testimony. And as court was to get underway here early Thursday, prosecutor Chiu told the judge that he first learned of Rosario’s newfound recollection days before trial. Chiu conceded he never forwarded that information to the defense.

Defense attorney Callie Steele objected to the new testimony because the information was never disclosed to the defense. The prosecution said that it had learned of these new facts on Sunday, but conceded that the information was never forwarded to the defense.

Prosecutor Allen Chiu asked that the case be dismissed because of the omission, and in the interest of "fairness and justice."

After the case was dismissed Crippen said: "It still has not hit me yet." When asked what he planned to do now that the case was behind him, Crippen added "I’m going back to school."

Crippen has a year left to earn a liberal arts degree from Cal State Fullerton. He wants to be a high school special-education and math teacher.


Comments

Re: Prosecutors Bail on Xbox Modding Case

I for one am very glad it went this way.The guy was looking at 10 years for this.I know of rapists and child molesters that do less time than that.No matter your opinion on the whole modding/piracy issue, there is no way to justify this guy spending more time in jail than a rapist.

Re: Prosecutors Bail on Xbox Modding Case

The judge tells them they are missing a component needed to argue the alleged crime and the next day a key witness "remembers" that, "oh wait, that really important key thing, it DID happen. Scouts honor". Makes me SICK. These people are corrupt, dishonest, scum bags. I hope they rot.

Re: Prosecutors Bail on Xbox Modding Case

Oh, I'm SURE the single most incriminating fact in the case just slipped his mind until right after the judge told them they had no case.

Re: Prosecutors Bail on Xbox Modding Case

The prosecutors thought that they were going to hang the guy dry, and when they saw that they were going to lose, they preferred to bail out rather than letting this sit jurisprudence.

Fairness and justice?. Hah. Like any of the MAFIAA's lawyers know what any of those two words mean.

Re: Prosecutors Bail on Xbox Modding Case

Exactly.  This way they can blame one bad witness, cut their losses, and leave it with no precedent set so that they can lie in wait for the NEXT guy to sue and make a stronger case then.

Still, it's a big win for the good guys.

Re: Prosecutors Bail on Xbox Modding Case

This video sums up the proscution pretty well

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMWN-HSR-rM

Watching JT on GP is just like watching an episode of Jerry springer only as funny as the fights

America has just became its own version of the Jerry Springer Show after a bizarre moment in Florida involving a carnival worker.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenNow, having said that, what sites are you reading that are claiming that if "you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem" or that gamers are "obligated to stop harassment"? Or was that hyperbole too?09/21/2014 - 1:03am
Andrew EisenFirst of all, ONE person in the Shout box suggested an obligation to call harassers out on their harassing but only after YOU brought it up. Plus, Techno said "when you see it happening." If you don't see it, you're not under any obligation.09/21/2014 - 1:02am
Sleaker@Craig R. - at this point I don't even know what the hashtags are suppsed to be in support of. what does GamerGate actually signify.09/21/2014 - 12:21am
Sleaker@AE - Hyperbole for the first 2, but it seems like some of the comments in the shout are attempting to place blame on fellow gamers because they aren't actively telling people to stop harassing even though they don't necessarily know anyone that has.09/21/2014 - 12:16am
Andrew EisenSleaker - Who the heck are you reading that is claiming "all gamers are bad," we "need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers," that if "you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem," or that gamers are "obligated to stop harassment"?09/20/2014 - 9:44pm
erthwjimhe swatted more than just krebs, I think he swatted 30 people http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/05/teen-arrested-for-30-swattings-bomb-threats/09/20/2014 - 9:31pm
Craig R.Btw, the guy who swatted security expert Brian Krebs? He got picked up recently. It can be done.09/20/2014 - 8:55pm
Craig R.Such things are not done in a vacuum... hence why the 4chan and other logs show what fools you've all been, tricked into doing the trolls' work09/20/2014 - 8:49pm
Sleaker@Technogeek - How do you call someone out that anonymously calls in a SWAT team, or sends threats to people?09/20/2014 - 7:04pm
Technogeek"It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so." I'd say you're certainly obligated to call them out when you see it happening.09/20/2014 - 5:17pm
SleakerNow if you disagree with anything in my last 2 posts then we obviously have a difference in world view, and wont come to any sort of agreement. I'm fine with that, maybe some people aren't?09/20/2014 - 5:09pm
SleakerIt also doesn't mean that just because a news outlet says that Gamers are the problem and you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem. It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so.09/20/2014 - 4:59pm
SleakerJust to re-iterate: People getting harassed is wrong. Just because someone is harassed by so called 'gamers' doesn't mean that all gamers are bad. nor does it mean that you need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers.09/20/2014 - 4:56pm
SleakerAnd furthermore just because someone doesn't 'crusade against the evil' that doesn't make them the problem. You can have discussion with those around you. There's a thing called sphere of influence.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
Sleaker@Conster - one person getting harassed is a 'problem' only so far as the harassee's are doing it. Just because a select few people choose to act like this doesn't make it widespread. Nor does it immediately make everyone responsible to put an end to it.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
james_fudgeno worries09/20/2014 - 4:15pm
TechnogeekI misread james' comment as "we can't have a debate without threatening" there at first. Actually wound up posting a shout about death threats and "kill yourself" not technically being the same thing before I realized.09/20/2014 - 3:59pm
james_fudgeDon't hit me *cowers behind Andrew*09/20/2014 - 3:20pm
ConsterYou take that back right now, james, or else. *shakes fist menacingly*09/20/2014 - 3:00pm
james_fudgeOur community is awesome. We can have a debate without threatening to kill each other.09/20/2014 - 2:50pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician