Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

December 7, 2010 -

The Star Press (which describes itself as the "news source for East Central Indiana") writer Jeffrey M.. McCall pens a two-page editorial called "Violent video games not an issue worthy of First Amendment protection," in which he attempts to lay out a case for Schwarzenegger v. EMA.

First, an explanation as to what the author thinks the entertainment industry really wants.. apparently it isn't freedom of expression:

"As usual, when it comes to controversial media content, the entertainment industry is trumpeting its First Amendment rights -- in this case to market violent video games to minors. Don't be fooled, however; these media producers have no real interest in First Amendment philosophy. They only want to make as much money as possible, even at the expense of our kids' emotional development."

The next paragraph shows that the author is going by what the State of California said before the Supreme Court, and not his own first-hand experience with games. He talks about "Postal," a game that no young kid in America wants to play:

"The games in question feature graphic portrayals of violence, carried out by the video game players. Police officers are shot. Women are decapitated. Shooting victims have gasoline poured on them and are set ablaze. The shooters urinate on their victims."

The author goes on to cite data from the PTC's secret shopper program and recaps all the negative moments the game industry faced in front of the Supreme Court. In the end McCall believes that this case is really about money and not about First Amendment rights.

You can read the entire thing here.

McCall is a professor of communication at DePauw University in Greencastle, and the author of the book "Viewer Discretion Advised: Taking Control of Mass Media Influences."


Comments

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

He's just old and out of touch... poor guy.

Must be tough sitting on your porch shaking your cane at things you don't understand nor partake in and being left behind by the world.

 

-------

Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.

------- Morality has always been in decline. As you get older, you notice it. When you were younger, you enjoyed it.

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

"The games in question feature graphic portrayals of violence, carried out by the video game players. Police officers are shot. Women are decapitated. Shooting victims have gasoline poured on them and are set ablaze. The shooters urinate on their victims."

Yet strangely, no police officers are shot. No women are decapitated. No shooting victims have gasoline poured on them and are set ablaze. Shooters never urinate on their victims. Why? Because it's a GAME. No one gets hurt. There is no more violence in Grand Theft Auto than there is in a game of Dominoes.

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

This crap is just beyond retarded.  The First Amendment  is specifically FOR situations such as this.  "This is bad so it should be banned" is the very central pillar to censorship!  No one has ever wanted to ban something that they did not think was wrongbad.  So everyone who has ever wanted to censor anything believes exactly as this person does.  Which is why the First Amendment was put into place to begin with.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

the entertainment industry is trumpeting its First Amendment rights -- in this case to market violent video games to minors.

WRONG!!! The industry is trumpeting it's First Amendment rights to create games and works of art as they see fit. They are trumpting the right to use their creative voices without undue harassment.

Guys like this seem to forget, or simply don't realize, that in the brief history of video games up to this point, they have never been made exclusively for children. Look at all the sex games the Atari 2600 had. And even before that there was an arcade game that was controlled by fondling fake breasts.

As for the "marketing violent video games to minors" part. WRONG!!! Now I'll admit that I don't watch today's kids shows, or shows aimed at kids. But I'm pretty sure I'm not going to turn on an episode of Avatar: The Last Air Bender, Wolverine and the X-Men or whatever happens to be popular and see an ad for Call of Duty: Black Ops. And I'm damn sure I won't be seeing one for Postal!!

"But they show those ads during sporting events, like the World Series or the Super Bowl, and kids watch those so they are marketing towards minors". So, does that mean we're marketing male enhancement drugs and beer to minors as well? Cause I certainly see more than my fair share of those ads during those events.

Just like books, movies, music and TV, not every single game that is made is made for kids. And until an ad for Halo: Reach or Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood shows up during the latest episode of Yu Gi Oh, you need to stop with this whole "marketing violent games to minors" thing.

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

Protip: Airbender is one word.

-------------------- Making sure I retain my INSANITY

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

s far as I know Postal 2 was NEVER advertised except by word of mouth and at gaming events.

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

The shooters relevant to kids now? Black Ops and Halo: Reach. Trotting out the Postal games just doesn't cut it.

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

You can thank Leland Yee, PR wizard for that. He can pull out games from obscurity like no one by using them as cannon fodder for his retarded anti-games rethoric. It´s super effective!

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

Similar to how some people pull out Phantasmagoria as a relevant game, even though that was made in the mid-90's.

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

A professor of communication who does not see how the same arguments would seem ludicrous if he replaced "game" with "movie" and, instead, described any of a number of unrated DVDs that have been appearing on store shelves for years now?

This hypocrisy blows my mind. Thank Kratos I'm sitting down.

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

I love how people state their opinion is "common sense"...igorning that the idea is controversial in scientific circles...so as to imply that any difference of opinion must be illogical. 

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

Ah.. 'common sense'.. the code word for saying that you have absolutly nothing to back up your opinion but want people to take you seriously anyway...

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

This would NOT let adults buy the games at all. It would be a banning on them as well since no store would sell a game the government says is obscene. Just like how porn films are banned form just about all stores so they can keep a family friendly image.

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

By his logic nothing deserves free speech...  Just another anti-capitalism ranter. 

Pwnage of Empires Xbox 360 Indie RTS

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

Hold the phone there man, I'M Anti-Capitalism and I 100% disagree with this douchebag.

Better yet, how the hell is this Anti-Capitalism?

-------------------- Making sure I retain my INSANITY

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

 I don't really give a shit about what the industry wants.  I want my personal rights to choose what media I consume and create.  This is about having the government get their foot in the door and regulate content.  

I'm still amazed by this sort of logical fallacy: the idea that every time an entity has a monetary interest in something, that that thing must automatically be bad.  

These particular journalist then should have no problem with the government running the press.  After all, the news outlets have a vested economic interest in a free press to produce news content.  Because these media outlets benefit economically from free speech, then a free press is therefore bad.

Another thing I don't get from this journalist and others of their ilk is this idea that "the children" are somehow the principal money source.  $60 is a lot of money, and children sure as shit don't carry that kind of grit around to a point where they are keeping the industry solvent.  Its ADULTS who even have the kind of disposable income to do so.  If games were mostly $5-$20 affairs, then perhaps the industry is supported by kids.  

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

This is disgusting on so many levels.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

I think I've heard of this guy.  One of the "old school" of thought like Anderson.  Ironic he takes the EMA to task for not paying attention to the research but he fails to note how often Anderson has been criticized by scholars of late, nor does McCall note the increasing body of research finding no link between games and youth violence.

Just embarassing to science...

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

trouble is, even if that were the case, and i probably is.

the laws would inhibit private citizens rights to make any sort of games of their own for any reason.

and given the popularity of politcal games atm among other types, this would basically say that these forms of expression should be deemed illegal, since they aren't expression of anything.

but isn't an expression of violence still an expression we all must face from time to time? be it verbal, physical, or virtual?

it'd also make silly little titles like "Gerbil in a Blender" from joe cartoon illegal under the terms of being animal cruelty.

to boot, it'd allow for an open hail storm against most other media types, especially in the movie industry, since their content is similar, and getting moreso as 3D FX gets better.

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

by his "logic", neither do movies, music, or television

岩「if Phyllis Schlafly wants to undo Women's Rights, she should lead by example and get back in the kitchen」

岩「…I can see why Hasselbeck's worried about fake guns killing fake people. afterall, she's a fake journalist on a fake news channel」

Re: Opinion: Games Don't Deserve Protection

 FACEPALM!

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Montewell thanks for the info Eisen; try that the next time i need something off the eshop09/23/2014 - 3:54pm
james_fudgere: MP, i've sent tech support a note - thank you :)09/23/2014 - 3:14pm
IanCNah that wasnt directed at you Andrew :)09/23/2014 - 3:00pm
Papa MidnightRe: SIEGE 2014 Keynote: oh dear...09/23/2014 - 2:44pm
MaskedPixelanteDear GP, something called "doubleverify" is causing some nasty browser issues on my end. Probably one of your ads.09/23/2014 - 2:36pm
Andrew EisenOh hell no. No, it took Nintendo a dog's age just to get to the point its competitors have been at for a while! (And it's still not there yet, in a lot of respects.)09/23/2014 - 2:26pm
IanCSame as PSN handles it, fi you are trying to say only nintendo do that.09/23/2014 - 2:23pm
Andrew EisenYou have to try to purchase something first. Pick a game, hit purchase and if your wallet doesn't have enough to cover it, you'll be given an option to "add exact funds" or something like that.09/23/2014 - 2:05pm
MonteI have seen no option for that on my 3DS; anytime i want to add funds it only gives me the option to add in denominations of $10, 20, 50 or 10009/23/2014 - 2:03pm
IanCWhat Andrew Wilson said. PSN is the same when you make a purchase over a certain price (£5 in the UK)09/23/2014 - 2:02pm
Andrew EisenNeither eShop charges sales tax either. At least in California.09/23/2014 - 2:00pm
Andrew EisenBoth Wii U and 3DS eShops allow you to add funds in the exact amount of whatever's in your shopping cart. If your game is $39.99, you can add exactly $39.99.09/23/2014 - 1:57pm
Infophile@Matthew Wilson: As I understand it, any regulations to force tax online would also set up an easy database for these stores to use, minimizing overhead.09/23/2014 - 1:30pm
MonteReally, the eshop just does next to nothing to make buying digitally advantagous for the customer. Its nice to have the game on my 3DS, but i can get more for less buying a physical copy at retail. And that's not even counting buying used09/23/2014 - 1:18pm
MonteIanC, The Eshop wallet system only lets you add funds in set denominations and the tax makes sure you no longer have round numbers so you ALWAYS loose money. A $39.99 game for instance requires you to add $50 instead of just $4009/23/2014 - 1:13pm
Matthew Wilsonbut thats just it those sites, even the small ones, sell all over the country.09/23/2014 - 11:12am
Neenekoeither that or it would follow the car model of today. big ticket items are taxed according to your residence, not where you buy them.09/23/2014 - 11:07am
NeenekoI doubt it would be the retailer that handles the tax in the first place. If it goes through it would probably be folded in as a service on the processor end or via 'turbotax' style applications.09/23/2014 - 11:05am
Matthew Wilsonsimple there are over 10k tax areas in the us for sales tax. it would be impossible for small online retailers to handle that.09/23/2014 - 10:55am
IanCWhats wrong with charging tax in an online shop?09/23/2014 - 10:47am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician