South Korean Teen Dies after 12 Hour Gaming Marathon

December 30, 2010 -

A 19 year old South Korean boy died after playing a game for more than 12 hours, according to a Daily News report (citing a Korean Times report). According to the report, a young man identified only by the surname "Moon" arrived at "PC Bang," an Internet cafe in the city of Ulsan, at around 2 a.m. on Dec. 27. He spent eight hours playing an "online action game" then went home to have a meal. Moon returned to PC Bang at 10:30 a.m. and resumed playing the game. At around 12:00 he collapsed and was rushed to a nearby hospital where doctors were unable to save him.

Local officials are investigating just what happened to Moon. The Daily News report doesn't come right out and blame games but it hints at it with the subtitle "Excessive gaming does more than just kill social lives, apparently." The government has been cracking down on Internet Cafes that let school-aged children from playing past certain times, and a recent law made it illegal to build a gaming parlor within a 200-meter radius of a school.

Source: Daily News


Comments

Re: South Korean Teen Dies after 12 Hour Gaming Marathon

This 200 meters restriction is also a law in Brazil. None game parlor can be setup within that range of a school. And i would back it up a law to prohibit minors from playing during school time. 15-16 year or less.

Re: South Korean Teen Dies after 12 Hour Gaming Marathon

Where is the 12 hour statement coming from?

He arrived at the place a 2 AM, according to the article, then took a break to get something to eat at 10 AM and returned to continue playing at 10:30 AM. Then he died at noon.

This means he played for 8 hours, took a break for lunch then passed on after playing for 1 and a half hours. That is 9 and half hours of gaming total WITH a break so it shouldn't even be considered a marathon.

Just saying, if an 8 hour straight session of looking at computer screen causes death, then office workers are screwed.

"

Re: South Korean Teen Dies after 12 Hour Gaming Marathon

He lasted only 12 hours? What a whimp...

Re: South Korean Teen Dies after 12 Hour Gaming Marathon

Is this the pro starcraft player Moon?

---------
There are only 10 types of people in this world, people who know binary and people who don't.

---------
There are only 10 types of people in this world, people who know binary and people who don't.

Re: South Korean Teen Dies after 12 Hour Gaming Marathon

Isn't Moon better known for playing Warcraft III? (Even though he is pretty good in SCII recently).

But no, "Moon"/"Mun" is a rather common Korean surname. But the player Moon though, is called Jae-Ho Jang and is 25. The guy in this report is 19. I guess it would be a much bigger story if the pro-player "Moon" actually died...

Re: South Korean Teen Dies after 12 Hour Gaming Marathon

Er..... ok... how well fed was the child and how was his health.... as a normal healthy kid can go a few days on lite sleep and nurshiment rather easiy....


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: South Korean Teen Dies after 12 Hour Gaming Marathon

He was 19; an adult and old enough to vote in South Korea, so he should have been able to take care of himself. In fact, the article states the he did. Since we don't know what the cause of death was, it may have been due to a medical condition that he was unaware of. A very tragic death, but nothing to do with gaming.

Re: South Korean Teen Dies after 12 Hour Gaming Marathon

Well, whatever the cause of death was, I think it's certain the gaming session wasn't it. Even if going without food or exercise for 12 hours could kill you (it couldn't), he took a break, presumably walked a short distance and ate.

Also, the times in the article only show that he played the game for 9 and a half hours, where they got the 12 hour figure remains a mystery.

Re: South Korean Teen Dies after 12 Hour Gaming Marathon

Although this is a tragic indident, I have trouble thinking excessive gaming is the cause of death, as it seems rather low. Back when I was this guy age, about six years ago, I frequently had 12 hours gaming sessions a day alongside others, even seldomly going up to 16 hours (yes it was a big nolife time in my life) with no side effects whatsoever.

Mayhap this yougster had a medical condition.

Re: South Korean Teen Dies after 12 Hour Gaming Marathon

 We really need to know a cause of death to draw any conclusions from this. Info on the kid's family life would also be helpful.

Re: South Korean Teen Dies after 12 Hour Gaming Marathon

Well... at least they said "excessive" gaming, not just gaming in general.

Moderation- it's the only thing humanity needs more of.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician