CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets Caught

January 10, 2011 -

Orange County. California sheriffs say that a 36-year-old-woman pretending to be a 23-year-old woman, seduced a 13-year old boy over Xbox Live. The woman subsequently took a trip from California to Maryland, where police allege that she had sex with the teenager. The online relationship began on Xbox Live in September and quickly escalated over the Thanksgiving holiday. The woman apparently met the boy in Maryland and had sex with him while his parents were sleeping.

The boy's parents became suspicious after finding romantic text messages on his phone. The woman also allegedly sent the boy x-rated pictures and movies of herself online.

The woman, Rachel Ann Hicks, is held without bail on charges of rape and child molestation. Hicks may face additional charges related to another young man she had inappropriate contact with, though police did not disclose details on that case. Hicks, the mother of three children, resides in Lake Forest.

Sheriffs enlisted the aid of "federal authorities" in finding Hicks’s real identity; she used a "fake name and age" on Xbox Live.

Source: Lake Forest Patch by way of Kotaku

Posted in

Comments

Re: CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets ...

Submitted by FlakAttack on Mon, 01/10/2011 - 23:52.

One point I feel is very important to note here is that this woman very likely has serious mental disorders. Jail time may not be appropriate or necessary in this case.

Re: CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets ...

Submitted by F__ked up on Mon, 01/10/2011 - 19:04.

I dont see anything wrong. If a 13 yr old can be charged as an adult for a crime, why is he a child when it comes to sex?

"When a 13 yr old commits murder they are an adult, when a 16 yr old has sex, they are a child"

www.fox4kc.com/wdaf-keaire-brown-trial-story-42809,0,7157236.story

www.eji.org/eji/childrenprison/deathinprison

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20017309-504083.html

Re: CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets ...

Submitted by Neeneko on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 09:20.

Public justice optimizes for the most blood.....

Re: CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets ...

Submitted by Papa Midnight on Mon, 01/10/2011 - 22:00.

To play Devil's Advocate, that's actually a fair and legitimate thought process I never considered. Hell, I'll take it one step further: practioners of Judiasm believe a person is an adult at the age of 13 and is accountable for their own decisions at that point.

I guess every aspect of society has their different viewpoints.

----
Papa Midnight
http://www.thesupersoldiers.com

----
Papa Midnight

Re: CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets ...

Submitted by MonkeyPeaches on Mon, 01/10/2011 - 16:10.

ewww ugly.

Re: CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets ...

Submitted by ZippyDSMlee on Mon, 01/10/2011 - 10:53.

13 is on the fence 10 is unquestionable. Tho I suppose at the end of the day sideing with jailing them is the best path to take.

Note to all my fellow pedos, all your loli/shota is baned, get over it :P

I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets ...

Submitted by HarmlessBunny on Mon, 01/10/2011 - 10:33.

You know if it was a boy around 17 years old...sure why not. Don't like it, but they are old enough to start making their own decisions.

However 13 is way too young. That is pretty sick.

---------

James Fletcher, member of ECA Canada

Re: CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets ...

Submitted by Zerodash on Mon, 01/10/2011 - 10:19.

Isn't a 23 year old still too old to be seducing a 13 year old?

Also, she looks like Wednesday Addams all grown up.

Re: CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets ...

Submitted by Neeneko on Mon, 01/10/2011 - 10:38.

Eh, it is about what I remember seeing in middleschool and high school, so while it is a bit of a gap, it is not unusual and would not raise alarm bells with peers.

Re: CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets ...

Submitted by Papa Midnight on Mon, 01/10/2011 - 14:09.

The sad fact is that this is actually true, but I used to see it in reverse where teen girls would love try to go out with older guys, college guys being the general preference. Amongst peers, this was seen as general practice - though amongst adults, obviously the thought process is not the same.

----
Papa Midnight
http://www.thesupersoldiers.com

----
Papa Midnight

Re: CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets ...

Submitted by Neeneko on Mon, 01/10/2011 - 15:49.

I know in theory we are supposed to be going 'oh no! destroying of innocence!'.. but in practice I have never seen people regret these relationships later (at least no more then any other type) and the people in them seem pretty content with the setup. The only people I see complaining are people not involved or grumbling that 'all the good girls are being taken by older guys!'.

Re: CA. Woman Seduces 13-Year-Old over Xbox Live, Gets ...

Submitted by Papa Midnight on Mon, 01/10/2011 - 21:55.

That's pretty much the status quo.

----
Papa Midnight
http://www.thesupersoldiers.com

----
Papa Midnight

Shout box

james_fudge: welcome to 2014 politics. Increasingly fought online10/20/2014 - 1:54pm

E. Zachary Knight: It is honestly a shame that anyone has to publicly state they are against such vile behavior, but that is the sad life we live.10/20/2014 - 1:46pm

E. Zachary Knight: Decided to publicly reiterate my opposition to harassment campaigns. http://randomtower.com/2014/10/just-stop-with-the-harassment-and-bullying-campaigns-already/10/20/2014 - 1:45pm

Andrew Eisen: Michael Chandra - Unless I overlooked it, we haven't seen how the directive to not talk about whatever he wasn't supposed to talk about was phrased so it’s hard to say if it could have been misconstrued as a suggestion or not.10/20/2014 - 12:35pm

Andrew Eisen: Hey, the second to last link is the relevant one! He actually did say "let them suffer." Although, he didn't say it to the other person he was bickering with.10/20/2014 - 12:29pm

Neo_DrKefka: https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/SxFas https://archive.today/1upoI https://archive.today/0hu7i https://archive.today/NsPUC https://archive.today/fLTQv https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 11:21am

Andrew Eisen: Neo_DrKefka - "Attacking"? Interesting choice of words. Also interesting that you quoted something that wasn't actually said. Leaving out a relevant link, are you?10/20/2014 - 11:04am

quiknkold: ugh. I want to know why the hell Mozerella Sticks are 4 dollars at my works cafeteria...are they cooked in Truffle Oil?10/20/2014 - 10:41am

Neo_DrKefka: Anti-Gamergate supporter Robert Caruso attacks female GamerGate supporter by also attacking another cause she support which is the situation happening in Syia “LET SYRIANS SUFFER” https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 10:18am

Neo_DrKefka: That is correct in an At-Will state you or the employer can part ways at any time. However Florida also has laws on the books about "Wrongful combinations against workers" http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/448.04510/20/2014 - 10:07am

james_fudge: he'd die if he couldn't talk about Wii U :)10/20/2014 - 9:16am

Michael Chandra: By the way, I am not saying Andrew should stop talking about Wii-U. I find it quite nice. :)10/20/2014 - 8:53am

Michael Chandra: 'How dare he ignore my wishes and my advice! I am his boss! I could have ordered him but I should be able to say it's advice rather than ordering him directly!'10/20/2014 - 8:52am

Michael Chandra: If GP goes "EZK, do not talk about X publicly for a week, we're preparing a big article on it" and he still tweets about X, they'd have a legitimate reason to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 8:52am

Michael Chandra: If GP tells Andrew "we'd kinda prefer it if you stopped talking about Wii-U for 1 week" and he'd tweet about it anyway, firing him for it would be idiotic.10/20/2014 - 8:51am

Michael Chandra: Legal right, sure. But that doesn't make it any less pathetic of an excuse.10/20/2014 - 8:50am

ZippyDSMlee: You mean right to fire states.10/20/2014 - 8:50am

james_fudge: some states have "at will" employee laws10/20/2014 - 7:50am

quiknkold: It says in the article that being in florida, you can get fired regardless if its a fireable offence10/20/2014 - 7:19am

Michael Chandra: If your employee respectfully disagrees with your advice, that's not a fireable offense. If they ignore your order, THEN you have the right to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 6:49am

All shouts

<< Return To Top

Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :