Activision Takes Aim at World of StarCraft Mod

January 19, 2011 -

Correction:An earlier version of this story erroneously reported that Blizzard / Activision had served the maker of the World of StarCraft mod with a "Cease and Desist" letter. This was not the case, and we have corrected the record, headline, and story below to reflect that. Apologies to all parties involved. Corrected story below: 

Activision has made a copyright infringement claim on YouTube, successfully getting a mod makers video removed from the service. The developer of World of StarCraft, an online StarCraft 2 MMO mod that combines the lore and gameplay elements of both games. Naturally the mod maker known only as "Ryan" is hurt and shocked by this action. Speaking at length on the mod's official forum, Ryan appeals to Activision to give him a break:

"You created a tool that allowed us to do anything with your assets. You encouraged us to use your assets and were eager to see what we might come up with. You had to have seen this coming?" Ryan wrote on his forum. "I know it's hard to trust someone you've never met to piggyback on your own legacy. The brilliance of StarCraft combined with the multiplayer focus of World of Warcraft. You might be a little worried about your lore being butchered or, even more so, worried about a guy with no supervision tainting the name of your company with poor product."

"Let me assure you that I am in no way shape or form going to deliver anything less than complete perfection," he continued. "I've been following your work since Warcraft. I've worked with every editor you've put out since I was 13 years old."

"If you have a problem with what I am doing or would like to talk about it, I'm all ears. But please don't send me some messenger with a cease and desist letter."

Ryan admits that he has no legal basis and if Activision / Blizzard want his mod to disappear, inevitably it will. He says he will do whatever they want him to do, adding that getting it on Battle.net is key to the mod's success:

"If Blizzard/Activision doesn't want this to happen then it won't," he wrote. "This game HAS to be pumped through the veins of Battle.net to work. I hope and pray that we can come to an understanding here. If they want the name changed then I'll change it."

Later in the thread he proves that he has not violated Blizzard's policy on videos. This could just be Activision policy as it relates to YouTube, which can easily be appealed by Ryan. According to this thread he has contacted Blizzard and is awaiting a response.

Source: RPS by way of Eurogamer


Comments

Re: Activision Takes Aim at World of StarCraft Mod

Looks like the only thing Blizzard wants is the name changed, looks like they are going to let him keep the mod going, just have to change the name.

 

GP seems to love stories where gamers are 'victims' its like crack for them.

Re: Activision Takes Aim at World of StarCraft Mod

I wonder if perhaps this is a subtle clue that a real, official World of Starcraft is already in development?

Re: Activision Takes Aim at World of StarCraft Mod

Where can I find the aforementioned Diablo-resembling StarCraft 1 based RPGs?

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

 Yay I can post now. Unfortunately, this post is not accurate. :/ Ryan never received a cease and desist letter. The only thing that happened was Activision telling YouTube that he was violating copyrights, and having them take down the World of Starcraft video. To be honest, this was probably just an over-zealous Activision legal troll, as the video that was posted does not violate Blizzard's video policy in the least (see: http://us.blizzard.com/en-us/company/legal/videopolicy.html).

Ryan has contacted Blizzard and is waiting for an official response, but I would doubt his mod is an issue, other than maybe him having to change the name of it for obvious reasons. RPGs were created for the original Starcraft that resembled Diablo, and there was a World of Warcraft mod for Warcraft III that was made. This isn't any different than those, and Blizzard didn't take issue.

More info can be found in his official forum: http://www.worldofstarcraft.proboards.com/

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

It may not have even been one of Activision's legal trolls. Youtube's anti-infringement scripts have been known to be trigger-happy at times, as Blizzard themselves found out when Youtube autodeleted a video from Blizzard's channel for apparently violating their own copyright.

Either way, more info is definitely needed here.
---
I'm not under the affluence of incohol as some thinkle peep I am. I'm not half as thunk as you might drink. I fool so feelish I don't know who is me, and the drunker I stand here, the longer I get.


---
I'm not under the affluence of incohol as some thinkle peep I am. I'm not half as thunk as you might drink. I fool so feelish I don't know who is me, and the drunker I stand here, the longer I get.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

Some trolls do make use of it by filing false reports.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

Thanks for the correction! :)

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

True, and as said, this is on Activision, not Blizzard. Blizzard is likely cool with it.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

This is one of those times where I wish there were no such thing as an NDA.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

 WTF, seriously.  After all the talking up Blizzard did over how great the SC modding community would be thanks to their tools and even allowing creators to SELL their work through Battle.net, they pull this crap?  Either someone was lying from the outset or someone at Activision legal wasn't listening.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

This one is on Activision, not Blizzard. We can probably expect addon support for WoW to be done away with next.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

Blizzard made the promises and Activision reneged. This is the fear that we all had when they merged coming to fruition.

- When you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks into you.

- When you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks into you.

Re: World of StarCraft Mod Maker Gets Cease and Desist ...

Did you really expect Blizzard to be able to keep any of their promises or to have any prior policies survive the purchase by Activision?

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MattsworknameWilson: how? Im still waiting for my upgrade notice07/29/2015 - 3:44am
Matthew WilsonI updated to a clean instill of windows 10.07/29/2015 - 2:36am
Mattsworknameargue that it's wrong, but then please admit it's wrong on ALL Fronts07/29/2015 - 2:06am
MattsworknameTechnoGeek: It's actually NOT, but it is a method used all across the specturm. See Rush limbaugh, MSNBC, Shawn hannity, etc etc, how many compagns have been brought up to try and shut them down by going after there advertisers. It's fine if you wanna07/29/2015 - 2:05am
Mattsworknamediscussed, while not what I liked and not the methods I wanted to see used, were , in a sense, the effort of thsoe game consuming masses to hold what they felt was supposed to be there press accountable for what many of them felt was Betrayal07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAs we say, the gamers are dead article set of a firestorm among the game consuming populace, who, ideally, were the intended audiance for sites like Kotaku, Polygon, Et all. As such, the turn about on them and the attacking of them, via the metods07/29/2015 - 2:03am
MattsworknameAndrew: Thats kind fo the issue at hand, Accountable is a matter of context. For a media group, it means accountable to its reader. to a goverment, to it's voters and tax payer, to a company, to it's share holders.07/29/2015 - 2:02am
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Banning in the legal sense? Not that I'm aware but there have certainly been groups of gamers who have worked towards getting content they don't like removed.07/28/2015 - 11:45pm
DanJAlexander's editorial was and continues to be grossly misrepresented by her opponents. And if you don't like a site, you stop reading it - same as not watching a tv show. They get your first click, but not your second.07/28/2015 - 11:40pm
TechnogeekYes, because actively trying to convince advertisers to influence the editorial content of media is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, especially for a movement that's ostensibly about journalistic ethics.07/28/2015 - 11:02pm
Mattsworknameanother07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
Mattsworknameyou HAVE TO click on it. So they get the click revenue weather you like what it says or not. as such, the targeting of advertisers most likely seemed like a good course of action to those who wanted to hold those media groups accountable for one reason07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
MattsworknameBut, when you look at online media, it's completely different, with far more options, but far few ways to address issues that the consumers may have. In tv, you don't like what they show, you don't watch. But in order to see if you like something online07/28/2015 - 9:12pm
MattsworknameIn tv, and radio, ratings are how it works. your ratings determine how well you do and how much money you an charge.07/28/2015 - 9:02pm
Mattsworknameexpect to do so without someone wanting to hold you to task for it07/28/2015 - 9:00pm
MattsworknameMecha: I don't think anyone was asking for Editoral changes, what they wanted was to show those media groups that if they were gonna bash there own audiance, the audiance was not gonna take it sitting down. you can write what you want, but you can't07/28/2015 - 8:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew, Im asking as a practical question, Have gamers, as a group, ever asked for a game, or other item, to be banned. Im trying to see if theres any cases anyone else remembers cause I cant find or remember any.07/28/2015 - 8:55pm
Andrew EisenAs mentioned, Gamasutra isn't a gaming site, it's a game industry site. I don't feel it's changed its focus at all. Also, I don't get the sense that the majority of the people who took issue with that one opinion piece were regular readers anyway.07/28/2015 - 8:43pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician