UKIE's Fuzzy Piracy Math

January 25, 2011 -

Publishing trade group UK Interactive Entertainment (UKIE) released estimates that for every game sold at retail four games are pirated. Director general Michael Rawlinson told GamesIndustry.biz that the group plans to commission "thorough research into the problem," though it probably should have done that before throwing the 4-to-1 figure out to the general public.

"Based on information received from a number of publishers we have estimates of games piracy running at between 4:1 against legitimate sales," said Rawlinson.

Rawlinson says that a recent report in the BBC's Newsbeat ("High Street retail lost £1.45 billion in 2010 due to piracy") is based on a "conservative guess using "the equivalent of console software sales in the UK last year."

"We took a conservative position of saying if this is only 1:1 across all titles it would have a retail equivalent value of £1.45million. We did not say this was the loss to industry," offered Rawlinson. "What is clear is people who 'share' games via P2P networks or buy illegal copies are not buying the real product, and this reduces retailer sales. It can provide the consumer with a sub-standard product and money paid to illegal traders does not flow back to the creative."

Of course, he acknowledged that finding the real cost of piracy to developers and publishers is difficult to calculate but promised to commission some serious research on the subject.

Sources GameIndustry.biz, BBC NewsBeat

Posted in

Comments

Re: UKIE's Fuzzy Piracy Math

Yeah, the 4:1 figure is clearly just a couple of numbers pulled out by a proctologist, but it seems the made up numbers are coming from their publishers, not UKIE directly.  At worst they're guilty of reporting hearsay. I do however have to give them credit for admitting that the 1.45 million figure dies NOT represent actual losses.

 

Re: UKIE's Fuzzy Piracy Math

Piracy numbers are only good for one thing, how mnay people you are underservering across the board.

THis of it as a always shifting and changing number of people in the market you are not pentratring and seling directly to them. Used sale counts as well. It simply means you need to do more to ofer your IPs through more venues at lower prices.


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: UKIE's Fuzzy Piracy Math

Is that second one supposed to be 1.45 million, or is it the same 1.45 billion referenced before?  And are these real billions or British billions (trillions)?  ;)

Re: UKIE's Fuzzy Piracy Math

Totally with Shahab on this one.  Piracy doesn't necessarily reduce the number of sales by the amount of games being downloaded directly.  You can't take into account through these figures people that downloaded the game and then bought it, along with those that refuse to buy because of price, or hold of buying till price drops.

Also, as Shahab pointed out.  Often times (and very much so in Ubisofts case)  having DRM free games and being able to install on more than one computer is giving someone better customer service than purchasing from them.

I wonder if these figures take into account Free Private MMO servers and such.  Often times people migrate because of poor customer satisfaction, but if they did include lost MMO revenue I think this number is definetely inflated.

My Steam Library is also very large, and for a lot of good reasons.  Valve knows how to handle customers, and their stance is that DRM doesn't help anybody, at all.

Re: UKIE's Fuzzy Piracy Math

I like how they say it can provide gamer's with a substandard product when in reality the pirated product is superior to the retail version, as there is no DRM, it can be installed on as many computers as one wants with no restriction, as it should be.

Anyway, the majority of games I play I purchase. Piracy can be a great way to test a game before you buy it, since you can not return a game that is buggy, unfinished, or in some other way defective. If things weren't so stacked against the consumer maybe piracy would not be as pervasive as some claim it is.

If you look at my Steam account alone it has over $2000 worth of legitimately purchased games on it. I really only buy games through services like Steam and Good Old Games anymore, as they allow you do install on multiple computers, you can download the title anywhere you have an Internet connection, and with Good Old Games there is NO DRM.

Re: UKIE's Fuzzy Piracy Math

Bullshit number is bullshit.

"Any" number of publishers? 1? 0?

Everything in their statement screams "we're making this up as we go."

Re: UKIE's Fuzzy Piracy Math

Didn't you know?  80% of statistics are made up on the spot.

it used to be 70% but there's been a rise in recent years.

Re: UKIE's Fuzzy Piracy Math

some say that 43% of all statistics are completely useless.

also, 75% of the following chart resembles pac-man.  images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/3/3a/Pac_man_pie_chart.jpg

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightTeachers unions are just as bad as police unions, except of course you are far less likely to be killed by a teacher on duty than you are a cop. But they also protect bad teachers from being fired.07/07/2015 - 6:29pm
E. Zachary KnightGoth, so you agree they are still union members. Thankfully we have a first ammendment that protects people from being forced to join groups they don't support (in most cases any way.)07/07/2015 - 6:27pm
E. Zachary KnightAh, police unions. The reason why cops can't get fired when they beat a defenseless mentally ill homeless person to death. Or when they throw a grenade into a baby's crib. Or when theykill people they were called in to help not hurt themselves.07/07/2015 - 6:26pm
Goth_SkunkeZeek: Non-union employees have no right to attend meetings or union convention/AGM, or influence policy. The only time they get to vote is whether or not to strike.07/07/2015 - 6:24pm
Infophile(cont'd) about non-union police officers being given hell until they joined the union.07/07/2015 - 4:58pm
InfophileParadoxically, the drive in the US to get rid of unions seems to have left only the most corrupt surviving. They seem to be the only ones that can find ways to browbeat employees into joining when paying dues isn't mandatory. I've heard some stories ...07/07/2015 - 4:57pm
Matthew WilsonI am old school on this. I believe its a conflict of interest to have public sector unions. that being said, I do not have a positive look on unions in general.07/07/2015 - 3:59pm
TechnogeekWhat's best for the employee tends to be good for the employer; other way around, not so much. So long as that's the case, there's going to be a far stronger incentive for management to behave in such a way that invites retalitation than for the union to.07/07/2015 - 3:10pm
TechnogeekTeachers' unions? State legislatures. UAW? Just look at GM's middle management.07/07/2015 - 3:05pm
TechnogeekIn many ways it seems that the worse a union tends to behave, the worse that the company's management has behaved in the past.07/07/2015 - 3:02pm
james_fudgeCharity starts at home ;)07/07/2015 - 2:49pm
james_fudgeSo mandatory charity? That sounds shitty to me07/07/2015 - 2:49pm
E. Zachary KnightGoth, if Union dues are automatically withdrawn, then there is no such thing as a non-union employee.07/07/2015 - 2:38pm
Goth_Skunka mutually agreed upon charity instead.07/07/2015 - 2:33pm
Goth_Skunkyou enjoy the benefits of working in a union environment. If working in a union is against your religious beliefs or just something you wholeheartedly object to, dues will still be deducted from your pay, but you can instruct that they be directed towards07/07/2015 - 2:33pm
Goth_SkunkBasically, if you are employed in a business where employees are represented by a union for the purposes of collective bargaining, whether or not you are a union member, you will have union dues deducted from your pay, since regardless of membership,07/07/2015 - 2:32pm
Goth_SkunkIt's something that has existed in Canada since 1946. You can read more on it here: http://ow.ly/PiHWR07/07/2015 - 2:27pm
Goth_SkunkSee, we have something similar in Canada, called a "Rand Employee." This is an employee who benefits from the collective bargaining efforts of a union, despite not wanting to be a part of it for whatever reason.07/07/2015 - 2:22pm
Matthew Wilson@info depends on the sector. for example, have you looked at how powerful unions are in the public sector? I will make the argument they have too much power in that sector.07/07/2015 - 12:39pm
InfophileIt's easy to worry about unions having too much power and causing harm. The odd thing is, why do people seem to worry about that more than the fact that business-owners can have too much power and do harm, particularly at a time when unions have no power?07/07/2015 - 12:31pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician