Survey Says: Online Gamers Aren't Dorky Loners

February 7, 2011 -

A new survey from Bigpoint reveals that the stereotypes associated with online gamers are false. A global survey of 6,663 "online gamers" found that most considered themselves well-rounded individuals with real world friends, good looking, and in relatively good health. The Bigpoint Gamer Survey presents a different image of online gamers - attractive, healthy, cultured, and popular with the opposite sex.

Around 62 percent of players said they had more friends in real life than online. Around 55 percent of players under 20 said they have more real friends than online friends, and 73 percent over the age of 50 claimed to have more real-life friendships. A total of 28 percent of the people met most of their friends online and went on to meet them in real life. Only a tenth of all gamers said that their only real friends were online gamers.

More than half of them – 52 percent said that they meet up with their friends regularly each month. A third (34 percent) claim to see their friends on a daily basis, though most of these tended to be younger players.

Bigpoint press officer Janine Griffel said that the image of the lone gamer playing on their own may be a thing of the past:

"Our study shows that online gamers are attractive individuals with healthy and active social lives. Social and casual games are very popular among our users for the reason that they emphasize being social. The trend’s definitely moving away from single-player games to social-based experiences."

By region, 40 percent of all surveyed players came from Turkey, 21 percent from Germany, 14 percent from France, and 11 percent from the United States. Approximately 58 percent of participants were under the age of 20, 26 percent were between the ages of 21–30, and 20 percent were aged 31–40. Only 12 percent were older than 40 and 5 percent were older than 50. The majority of participants - 89 percent were male. Around 32 percent were married, 61 percent were single, and 6 percent were either divorced or separated.

The full details of this survey will be released at Casual Connect February 8–10, in Hamburg, Germany.


Comments

Re: Survey Says: Online Gamers Aren't Dorky Loners

The article states the online gamers they surveyed claim to have more friends in real life than interent friends and that they are good looking: That is no different than asking anyone else who has good self-esteem. The idea of claiming to have more online friends than friends in real life would be some what embarrasing in the society we live in. Nevertheless, online friends are still friends.

I think they are missing the bigger picture here. If loners are willing to do a survey, it would most likely involve a token of exchange, and they wouldn't mind claiming to be loners. AND just because someone who plays online doesn't necessarily exclude them from being a loner. Online gaming is purely perspective. Having skill in a game does involve a lot of pressure from the community, especially if you always join servers under the same name... And of course some people play online just to play, no chit-chat.

----------------------------------------

"Because this town is under the stranglehold of a few tight eyed Tree Huggers who would rather play Hacky Sack than lock up the homeless" -- Birch Barlow

---------------------------------------- "Because this town is under the stranglehold of a few tight eyed Tree Huggers who would rather play Hacky Sack than lock up the homeless" -- Birch Barlow

Re: Survey Says: Online Gamers Aren't Dorky Loners

Dorky loners get a bad rap. They're blamed for almost every anti-social problem, up to and including serial murder. Yet the fact is, most serial killers are frustrated extroverts. Real loners want to be left alone, so going out in search of victims hardly fits their MO.

As for gaming, anyone who seeks out friends online is by definition NOT a loner. Online gamers are social by definition, so the results of this survey are hardly surprising or a 'news' item. Now if the survey polled gamers who DON'T play online, THAT'S where the real loners are. We don't play online because, apart from a very few trusted friends, we want the rest of this planet's arseholes to leave us the hell alone.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonmy god....... people need to play life is strange. its a very very dark version of twin peaks08/01/2015 - 12:56pm
DocMelonheadLook, I know that you guys wanted to study Gamergate; hell, one of your writers were Interviewing KiA on the subject (He's been banned from GamerGhazi). Sadly, the minorities veiwed Gamergate the same way as WBC at best, and Nazis at worst.08/01/2015 - 12:31pm
DocMelonheadIP wanted you to know that GamerGate is about Harassing minorities into submission, not "Ethnics in Journalism". It been a year since the Zoe Post was published and sparked a hate mob on Zoe Quinn.08/01/2015 - 12:28pm
DocMelonheadThat what's IP's goal is here in regard to gamergate: to get you guys to disassociate yourselves from the harassers that made all those claims up to threaten the advocates of social justice for minorities.08/01/2015 - 12:24pm
DocMelonheadIP tries to demonize all of GamerGate and it's supporters, along with those who didn't outright condemn it as a cover for a hate mob full of bigots.08/01/2015 - 12:20pm
MechaCrashNo, IP is trying to dehumanize you, I'm just pointing out that you're a hypocrit who makes bad faith arguments.08/01/2015 - 11:56am
Andrew EisenAnd I'm off too. Play nice, y'all!08/01/2015 - 11:33am
Andrew EisenIn short, discussions of ethics in journalism? Totally fine. Said indie dev's sex life? Not okay.08/01/2015 - 11:31am
james_fudgeTry talking when you have hundreds of people tweeting at you at the same time :)08/01/2015 - 11:30am
Andrew EisenAnd yet, when 30-seconds of research showed that there was no relevance to said indie dev's sex life, many people kept talking about. Hell, still do to this day. I had a guy on Twitter pester me about this nonsense for an entire day last weekend.08/01/2015 - 11:30am
james_fudgeWhatever dude, you're here posting. No one's stopping you.08/01/2015 - 11:30am
Goth_SkunkBe advised: In approximately 30 minutes I'm heading out of town for an obligatory family reunion. This is being stated so that none can interpret my upcoming 24 hour hiatus as a tail-tucking turn from discussion.08/01/2015 - 11:28am
Goth_SkunkEven now, IronPatriot, MechaCrash, and Craig R. continue to attempt to shout me down and dehumanize me.08/01/2015 - 11:25am
Goth_SkunkWhat transpired afterwards was a concerted effort to shout down and dehumanize those trying to bring these matters out into the open. I remain utterly convinced of this to this day.08/01/2015 - 11:24am
Goth_SkunkAnd yet the sex life of this indie developer tied right into the matter of journalistic ethics, as investigations uncovered a great number of breaches of ethical conduct, both related & not. That scandal is the orifice from which the balloon is inflated.08/01/2015 - 11:20am
MechaCrashI am reminded of the saying about playing chess with a pigeon.08/01/2015 - 11:13am
Andrew EisenThis is supported by, well, what actually happened, but also the text of the actual leaks. That was Tito's question and what he and a few (four total, I think) were discussing.08/01/2015 - 11:11am
Andrew EisenNo, it's not. What was generally prohibited was not discussion of journalistic ethics or other GamerGate topics, but threads that were, for example, discussing the sex life of an indie developer. THOSE are what were locked and removed.08/01/2015 - 11:10am
Goth_SkunkI don't believe you. Not for a second. Every major site with the exception of the Escapist prohibited discussion of GamerGate in its early stages. That is a fact.08/01/2015 - 11:04am
Andrew EisenNo, that's a fact. Don't believe me, read 'em yourself. No one was trying to censor discussion of GamerGate.08/01/2015 - 11:02am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician