SCEA Expedited Discovery Request Denied, Hotz TRO Hearing Today

February 10, 2011 -

California District Court Judge Susan Illston (San Francisco) denied Sony's request for "expedited discovery" this week, dashing the company's hopes that it could force technology companies to release information related to the George Hotz case. The company will have to wait until a hearing on March 11, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

This means that, for the time being, Sony cannot send out any of the subpoenas to various tech companies such as Slashdot, Google, Twitter, etc. Sony had hoped to divulge the identities of hacking group Fail0verFlow's membership, which would allow it to add their names to the ongoing legal action against Hotz.

The court also granted George Hotz a hearing today to discuss the Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) - previously granted without a hearing. The issue at hand continues to be whether or not the court actually has jurisdiction because the actions of Hotz took place on the Internet and from his computer which physically resides in New Jersey.

Hotz wanted expediency for the TRO hearing because Sony was set to take posession of his property as ordered by the court. From court documents:

"If a hearing is not held by February 10, 2011, Mr. Hotz will be forced to surrender his storage devices to Plaintiff SCEA, and will continue to be restrained, without a hearing or consideration of the substance of the TRO Order. A hearing is also needed so that Mr. Hotz may limit the breadth and vagueness of the TRO."

The judge agreed:

"Having considered the Motion for An Order Shortening Time for Hearing Motion for Hearing on Temporary Restraining Order by Defendant George Hotz, the supporting declaration of counsel, and all papers and arguments, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Hearing on Mr. Hotz’s Motion for Hearing on Temporary Restraining Order shall be held on February 10, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED."

I hope that we can bring you the results of that hearing later today. Stay tuned. In the interim, you can check out the court documents below:

 

 

Source: PSX-Scene


 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenMatt - Every group has its jerk faces. Especially groups like feminists that are so large they encompass the vast majority of the population.07/28/2015 - 4:47pm
Andrew EisenAnd I don't get the sense many if any take anyone's thoughts at face value. They seem to be listening to what they have to say, evaluating what they heard, agreeing or disagreeing and acting accordingly. Or just outright ignoring them in the first place07/28/2015 - 4:44pm
Mattsworknametoxic to it's economy07/28/2015 - 4:42pm
MattsworknameWow, im out for a day and some cool discussion happens. On the subject brought up by Natir, I think modern feminism has be come toxic, at least in it's radicalized form ,much te same as I feel about how unions went from improtant things in the us to being07/28/2015 - 4:42pm
Andrew EisenI don't know about anyone else but I'm not comfortable forming an opinion let alone drawing a conclusion without having seen even one of the allegedly harassing tweets.07/28/2015 - 4:41pm
NatirI just find it baffling that the gaming industry as a general whole take what those women say at face value... On the Canadian man story, I don't think he will be charged but I think the women will be charged with something.07/28/2015 - 4:30pm
Goth_SkunkFor reference, this is the matter to which Natir is referring: http://ow.ly/QcAch And -- small world after all -- Anita Sarkeesian is indirectly tied to it.07/28/2015 - 4:22pm
NatirIt kind of reminds me of the 3 women who took that one man (in Canada) to court because he disagreed with them on Twitter.07/28/2015 - 4:12pm
NatirThat article is the reason why I really hate a lot of feminists who just want to try and "expose" the gaming industry... It really isn't as bad as those few say it is.07/28/2015 - 4:09pm
james_fudgeNothing wrong with doing that for an interview. I was concerned the *interviewer* didn't know who the person was. I was mistaken.07/28/2015 - 4:07pm
Goth_SkunkI understand the reservation and tendency to be skeptical conducting an interview with someone on the condition of anonymity. But reading through that article, I can empathize with the request.07/28/2015 - 4:06pm
james_fudgelet me sum up what GG is 1.5 seconds instead of 15 minutes: it's a culture war.07/28/2015 - 4:05pm
E. Zachary KnightSo this guy basically says that GamerGate needs to focus more on the SJW side of things rather than the Ethics side of things. Or am I reading this wrong?07/28/2015 - 3:54pm
james_fudgeFYI: someone at TR knows who this person is.07/28/2015 - 3:44pm
james_fudgeI'm all over the map today. Sorry07/28/2015 - 3:26pm
james_fudgeNM I'll just ask them directly :)07/28/2015 - 3:19pm
james_fudgeWhen i did that interview with that former GG person, I knew their identity.I am just curious if TR does or if this is an "on faith" (from other people) interview.07/28/2015 - 3:18pm
Andrew EisenDaugette said on Twitter he did and the article itself says TR editors did. That's all I know. Not familiar with any of these people. My familiarity with TR is only what Goth and other readers have linked.07/28/2015 - 3:16pm
james_fudgeOr did they take the word of GG's most vocal supporters?07/28/2015 - 3:14pm
james_fudgeDid TechRaptor verify it?07/28/2015 - 3:12pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician