Psychologist Jerry Weichman Clarifies Bulletstorm Comments

February 23, 2011 -

Clinical psychologist and self-proclaimed adolescent specialist Jerry Weichman has clarified his position on comments made to Fox News that were used in a Bulletstorm hit piece written by John Brandon. Responding to a request for comment by Rock, Paper, Shotgun, Weichman said that he stands by his comments to Fox News, but adds that those comments do not clearly state his full opinion on violence, video games, and his position on mature rated games.

First, Weichman defends his comments in the Fox News article ("If a younger kid experiences Bulletstorm’s explicit language and violence, the damage could be significant. Violent video games like Bulletstorm have the potential to send the message that violence and insults with sexual innuendos are the way to handle disputes and problems"), saying that greater regulation on videogames is necessary, because of this. He cites his own experience with teenagers as a psychologist, but does not provide any research data to back up his claims:

"My experience as an adolescent psychologist lies the behavioral work I have done with thousands of teens, including many teen gaming addicts. My opinion, as stated in my quote, is that there is potential to do harm, but certainly this is not the outcome for 100 percent of the game’s users. And obviously the folks at ESRB agree, since it’s rated M for Mature and was not designed for young audiences."

Despite sticking to what he told Fox News, Weichman says that he sees no problem with mature game content being enjoyed by the audience it is intended for, adding that he enjoys playing games such as Halo and Call of Duty. He does admit that his comments on Bulletstorm were based on several videos he watched online. He has not played the demo:

"I have not played it but seen videos of its content. As an adult, I enjoy playing first-person shooter games like Halo and Call of Duty and do so in my spare time quite often. But I would certainly not want my child exposed to these games either. Mature content should be reserved for mature or adult users."

The most interesting quote from Weichman is about parental responsibility and his disappointment that the article didn't offer some resources for parents to check out:

"My work with teens leads me to put the bulk of the responsibility on the parent and I wish that the article had given parents more information or tips on ways they can monitor their child’s gaming activities to insure that they are playing games which contain content appropriate for the individual child’s maturity level. It’s not easy being a parent today when many children are more technologically-advanced than their parents but ultimately the parents cannot just rely on the “system” for their child’s safety. They have to educate themselves, stay involved in the content entering their home, and work a little harder to make sure that they are aware of what their kid is doing."

Read the whole thing here. You can check out his web site here.


Comments

Re: Psychologist Jerry Weichman Clarifies Bulletstorm ...

If a younger kid experiences Bulletstorm’s explicit language and violence, the damage could be significant.

Is there any evidence of this? How he defines "damage"? How he defines "significant"? Does he consider that other media also has the same kind of content? Who I am kidding, he doesn´t care.

Despite sticking to what he told Fox News, Weichman says that he sees no problem with mature game content being enjoyed by the audience it is intended for, adding that he enjoys playing games such as Halo and Call of Duty.

Then, what´s the problem with Bulletstorm and all Mature rated games on Earth? They are meant for adults. This is not a problem coming from game companies or the ERSB or from retailers. This is a problem related to parents unwilling to do the job by themselves and oportunistic politics and "news" media like FOX.

------------------------------------------------------------ My DeviantArt Page (aka DeviantCensorship): http://www.darkknightstrikes.deviantart.com

Re: Psychologist Jerry Weichman Clarifies Bulletstorm ...

He keeps referring to his "experiences" with teens with addictions, etc.

The problem with the "results" of his "experiences" is that they totally involve troubled teens and children, of one type or another.  Whether he's lumped them together as "addicted" or some other problem, he hasn't compared the overwhelming number of unaffected and "normal" individuals, child or adult, that DO exist.  He clearly hasn't bothered to compare/contrast the general population and determine why the troubled individuals are different from the not troubled individuals.

Yes, I know, psychological research eliminates the individual from the equation.  And that is where so much research fails at the core, despite all the "yup yup, uh huh" peer review nonsense.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: Psychologist Jerry Weichman Clarifies Bulletstorm ...

Freud doesn't get away with it today, why are we letting clinical psychologists get away with it now? 

Re: Psychologist Jerry Weichman Clarifies Bulletstorm ...

He cites his own experience with teenagers as a psychologist, but does not provide any research data to back up his claims:

He takes a page out of Frederic Wertham's book here. Wertham based Seduction of the Innocent entirely on anecdotal studies on delinquent teens he worked with who mentioned they liked comic books.

Re: Psychologist Jerry Weichman Clarifies Bulletstorm ...

Ah, the ubiquitous "What I really meant was..." restatement.
 

There sounds like a lot of hindsight in this, like maybe doing the research, siting his sources, and PLAYING THE GAME before making the statment. Or maybe not making the statement in the first place.  Especially TO FOX!

"My opinion, as stated in my quote, is that there is potential to do harm, but certainly this is not the outcome for 100 percent of the game’s users. And obviously the folks at ESRB agree, since it’s rated M for Mature and was not designed for young audiences."

And that's another problem. People assuming what the ESRB might have researched, rather than looking it up themselves.

I mean, if games aren't harmful to kids, why do we even have a rating system? Obviously, the ESRB MUST agree with anti-gamers if they don't want kids to play these games, right?

Re: Psychologist Jerry Weichman Clarifies Bulletstorm ...

"Violent video games like Bulletstorm have the potential to send the message that violence and insults with sexual innuendos are the way to handle disputes and problems."

And if your child takes that message as a fact of life then there is something significantly wrong with him/her.  And probably your parenting too (or, likely, lack thereof).

 

Andrew Eisen

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Mattsworknameequally importat reaons . I find it strange that worf says something i agree with so much, yet i know people who woudl fight bloodily about it. Kinda silly05/04/2015 - 10:56pm
MattsworknameI mysef love both of them, Im a huge fan of wars and trek, and It was a big part of my childhood for different, but e05/04/2015 - 10:55pm
MechaTama31I really liked the first reboot Trek. Of course, I have generally liked other Abrams movies. The newer Trek movie had its moments, but wasn't as good, imho.05/04/2015 - 10:43pm
Craig R.Wife is a huge Wars fan, doesn't think much of Abrams either. So, we've found some common ground...05/04/2015 - 10:39pm
Craig R.I'm more of a Trek than Wars fan, but haven't watched either reboot film, don't care for Abrams05/04/2015 - 10:38pm
MechaTama31RE: Trek vs. Wars, I've always liked both, and although I often hear it said that the fanbases are at odds, I have never seen a shred of that in real life. Online, sure, but the internet amplifies that kind of thing, we all know that.05/04/2015 - 10:23pm
MechaTama31Because GG "tainted" those other opinions, and you couldn't express them without also implying support for all the other crap the jerk faces did.05/04/2015 - 10:19pm
MechaTama31Any GG-related discussion I got involved in, if someone expressed anything even tangentially supportive of anything GG supported, that person was guilty by association of everything GG did (whether they mentioned GG or not).05/04/2015 - 10:18pm
MechaTama31"There's no need for anyone who's not a jerk face to admit to vile actions they didn't commit." That's a nice thought, AE, but that's certainly not how it goes down, even here.05/04/2015 - 10:17pm
Goth_SkunkI for one do agree with him. I always have, as a fan of both franchises. Hopefully with J.J. Abrams doing both the Star Wars AND the Star Trek films, that'll help mend this silly rift between fanbases.05/04/2015 - 9:50pm
MattsworknameWell said MR worf, well said, but I doubt the treks and the star wars fans agree05/04/2015 - 9:44pm
PHX CorpMichael Dorn tells Star Trek and Star Wars fans that both fanbases are all part of the same Scifi family https://twitter.com/akaWorf/status/59528225364038860805/04/2015 - 9:29pm
MattsworknameAmen andrew, Amen05/04/2015 - 8:51pm
Andrew Eisenand we can all hopefully march towards a brighter future without them. Or, ideally, they act like decent human being and tag along.05/04/2015 - 8:40pm
Andrew EisenWhatever term we use, we end up creating an us vs them scenario and that's not conducive to what any of us want to achieve. Simply call out the jerk faces, no matter where you find them or what hashtags they do or do not use, condemn the behavior...05/04/2015 - 8:39pm
Mattsworknamesee a wider variety of roles for females in games as a whole, and I would love to see more games that are headed by a feamle lead succedding Hell, some of my faves have always had females. I would love to see more05/04/2015 - 8:32pm
MattsworknameI thnk that using groups is the wrong term andrew like you said, but, whats the better term, sides or movments? anyway, I actually agree with some things that anita and others have said, i would love more well writter females in games, I would love to05/04/2015 - 8:30pm
MattsworknameTwitter has beccome a virtual garbage dump over the last few years, I dont blame people from filtering twitter the way it is now05/04/2015 - 8:21pm
MattsworknameYou make a good point, i keep thinking of these as groups but there more movments then groups, I guess.05/04/2015 - 8:20pm
Andrew EisenAnd I wouldn't accuse people who block others on Twitter of being unwilling to discuss their views. From what I've seen it's mostly to keep from being harassed, dog piled, avoid topics you have no interest in, or simply to keep your Twitter feed readable.05/04/2015 - 8:16pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician