Gamestop Targeted by Class Action Lawsuit

March 2, 2011 -

U.S. retailer GameStop has been targeted by a class action lawsuit alleging it obtained and recorded personal information about its customers without their express consent. The main plaintiff in the case is Melissa Arechiga of Alameda County California. Her attorneys allege that GameStop illegally recorded her name, credit card number, and personal identification information (PII) following a shop purchase. The thrust of the lawsuit is that GameSpot regularly uses PII from customers to derive additional personal information, including residential addresses.

"Such conduct is performed intentionally and without the knowledge or consent of the cardholder, and is of potentially great benefit to [GameStop]," reads the suit.

Arechiga is seeking damages and a court order preventing GameStop from retaining personal information. Because this is a class action, any Gamestop customer in California is listed as a plaintiff. A full copy of the suit can be found in this PDF on IGN.

Source: IGN by way of GI.biz


Comments

Re: Gamestop Targeted by Class Action Lawsuit

Apologies to Andrew Eisen for me about to steal one of his signature lines.

"That's not what I said."

First and foremost, you just re-iterated the point I made. It's impossible for Gamestop to have gotten her information without her consent. You use a credit card, you authorize the store to *Gasp* obtain your credit card information so we know who to send the damn bill to. It's actually federal law to NOT obtain the information. Because if you don't pay your credit card bill, they know where you spent the money. It's called a "paper trail", except replace the paper with zeroes and ones. I'd like to see it explained on how you can use a credit card and NOT give your consent to collect your credit card information.

Second, I didn't say Gamestop "has enough money". You're right, in that respect. No company "has" enough. What I actually said was "they make enough money", by which I mean that I know for a fact that the company as a whole makes enough money to the point where they don't have to resort to underhanded tactics like selling customer's information to a third party.

Nice try, but next time, try reading what someone says before you "quote" them.

 

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: Gamestop Targeted by Class Action Lawsuit

The only reason she would have to give her personal information is if she A) Purchased a PowerUp Rewards Card. B) Returned an item for a refund. C) Traded in a game.

A) Is done so they know where to send your magazines.

B) Is done so they know you aren't abusing their policies.

C) Is done because just about every state law requires it.

In any of those three cases, your personal information is given to them willingly, and the latter two you even have to sign your name saying you acknowledge so.

That said, Gamestop doesn't need to sell anyone's information to anybody. They make enough money as it is.

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: Gamestop Targeted by Class Action Lawsuit

Most state laws actually forbid collecting this information without consent. I don't know what you are smoking. The lawsuit is very clear that she made a regular purchase and that Gamestop retained her CC information in order to figure out her address, which is 100% illegal to do without consent.

 

Also, no company "has enough money". If you have so little factual basis to an argument that you have to say "they have enough money" then please realize you probably shouldn't be saying anything at all.

Re: Gamestop Targeted by Class Action Lawsuit

Small correction needed:

" The thrust of the lawsuit is that GameSpot regularly ..."

It's Gamestop, not Gamespot.

They are so close together spelled that I make the error a lot when going to one site or the other.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Poll: Is it censorship when a private retailer decides not to sell a particular video game?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBWlnL6Tr6k part 2 of the witcher history05/28/2015 - 10:54am
Infophile@Wonderkarp. Yeah, that's ads. Some advertisers use a trick to open up an appstore address, which forces the phone to shift over to it. I wish providers would be more diligent about it, even if all they can do is punish offenders after it happens05/28/2015 - 10:33am
MechaCrashFor all your wounded pearl clutching and HOW DARE YOUing, you're sure quick to resort to schoolyard insults like the petulant child you are.05/28/2015 - 10:25am
MechaCrashI wasn't even trying to offend you. I just didn't care if I did, because you're a thin skinned hypocrite who routinely argues in bad faith.05/28/2015 - 10:23am
MechaCrashYeah, smearing everyone with a broad brush is your schtick. And also, I hate you.05/28/2015 - 10:22am
WonderkarpFudge, for some reason sometimes when I access Gamepolitics on my phone, it shoots me over too my app store. I think its the Ads05/28/2015 - 9:58am
WonderkarpI'm not perpetually offended. I'm an regular viewer of South Park. I have a problem with people saying gamergaters are school shooters. That and lets be honest. I dont like MechaRash05/28/2015 - 9:55am
Ivresse@MechaCrash: I'd like to refer you to the words of Stephen Fry: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGA3QGHW8AARsax.jpg05/28/2015 - 9:43am
Wonderkarpalright Fudge05/28/2015 - 9:27am
MechaCrashWhat good is being one of the perpetually offended if you don't make sure everybody sees just how offended you are?05/28/2015 - 9:02am
james_fudgeYou two can reasonably slug it out in the article in question if you want :)05/28/2015 - 8:59am
MechaCrashI wasn't expecting you to drag it into the shoutbox, either. Just when I think I have you pegged, you prove me only MOSTLY right.05/28/2015 - 8:55am
MechaCrashWhat argument? You made a joke in bad taste. I made a response joke in similar bad taste. And you are going berserk with...okay, not the flavor of HOW DARE YOU I was expecting (I thought you'd No True Scotsman, instead you dodged it entirely).05/28/2015 - 8:52am
Wonderkarpfyi, thats a self made "REDACTED" to make Mr Fudges life a little easier.05/28/2015 - 8:50am
Wonderkarphow is calling somebody out for being a [REDACTED] throwing a Tantrum? Is it cause you cant dispute my argument?05/28/2015 - 8:46am
MechaCrash"Grow a thicker skin," says the person throwing a tantrum that's filling the shoutbox.05/28/2015 - 8:40am
Wonderkarpbeen a bombing had Sarkeesian spoke, because there would be an increase police presence and nobody is THAT STUPID to make a threat like that and follow through. This isnt the movies05/28/2015 - 8:35am
WonderkarpIts what you make of them. GamerGate in DC had a bomb threat. Police were there, but GG continued to enjoy themselves and have a good time. Bomb Threats in general, you give them to the police and continue your business. I guarantee there wouldnt have05/28/2015 - 8:34am
MechaCrashhttp://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/58521856-78/sarkeesian-usu-video-feminist.html.csp Remember the talk Sarkeesian had to cancel because of death threats? Yeah. That's the thing I'm talking about.05/28/2015 - 8:30am
WonderkarpI'm not defending Bomb Threats. They are idiotic and have no place in society, but as somebody who lived through several bomb threats I can tell you they are weak05/28/2015 - 8:29am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician